Cover not available
Part of
Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond
Edited by Robert Crellin and Thomas Jügel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352] 2020
► pp. 377–410

Chapter 11
The Hittite periphrastic perfect

| University of Pavia
| University of Pavia
In Hittite, the meaning associated with the Proto-Indo-European perfect, i.e. to indicate a state resulting from a change-of-state event, was covered by compound verb forms consisting of the -ant- participle plus the finite forms of the verbs ḫar(k)- “have” and eš- “be”. The origin and the function of this construction have been a matter of debate. In this chapter, we review the standard description of the Hittite periphrastic perfect, and reassess its status and function based on an analysis of its occurrences in texts ranging from Old to New Hittite. We argue that periphrastic forms involving ḫar(k)-/eš- and the participle instantiate three different constructions: the stative construction and two distinct auxiliary verb constructions, i.e. the passive and the perfect. We also suggest that the stative construction was probably the most ancient, and that the perfect construction, which functions as an anterior, constitutes a later development.
Keywords: Hittite, anterior, passive, resultative, auxiliary verb construction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Aims and structure of the chapter
    • 1.2The Anatolian verbal system in an Indo-European perspective
  • 2.Periphrastic perfect constructions in a cross-linguistic perspective
    • 2.1Typology of periphrastic constructions
    • 2.2Aspect and actionality
  • 3.Current research and open issues
    • 3.1ḫark- and eš- constructions
    • 3.2Semantics of the Hittite participle
    • 3.3The periphrastic passive construction
    • 3.4Formal aspects of ḫark- and eš- constructions
    • 3.5Relationship between ḫark- and eš- constructions
  • 4.AVC or stative construction?
    • 4.1Imperative
    • 4.2Indicative
      • 4.2.1With ḫark-
      • 4.2.2With eš-
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 September 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.352.11ing
References (62)
References
Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2006. Auxiliary verb constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1962. Hittite et indo-européen: études comparatives (Bibliothèque archéologique et historique de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie d’Istanbul 5). Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1986. Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano. Florence: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Valentina Cambi. 2006. Hittite temporal adverbials and the aspectual interpretation of the ške/a- suffix. In Raffaella Bombi et al. (eds.), Studi linguistici in onore di Roberto Gusmani, 193–233. Alessandria: L’Orso.Google Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline. 1984. The Hittite ḫark- construction (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 44). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Hittite periphrastic constructions. In Carruba (ed.), 35–59.Google Scholar
. 2001. An intransitive ḫark-? In Gernot Wilhelm (ed.), Akten des IV. Internationalen Kongresses für Hethitologie. Würzburg, 4–8 Oktober 1999 (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 45), 40–50. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Botne, Robert. 2003. To die across languages: Toward a typology of achievement verbs. Linguistic Typology 7. 233–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyer, James L. 1987. A classification of imperatives: a statistical study. Grace Theological Journal 8. 35–54.Google Scholar
van Brock, Nadia. 1964. Les themes verbaux à redoublement du hittite et le verbe indo-européen. Revue hittite et asianique 22:75. 119–165.Google Scholar
Brosman, Paul W. 2010. The nt-participle and verbal adjectives in *-to- . Indogermanische Forschungen 115. 22–34.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cambi, Valentina. 2005. The Hittite adverb karū: ‘formerly, earlier; already’. In Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Robbins Dexter (eds.), Proceedings of the sixteenth annual UCLA Indo-European Conference. Los Angeles. November 5–6, 2004 (Journal of Indo-European Monograph Series 50), 219–234. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
. 2007. Tempo e Aspetto in ittito: con particolare riferimento al suffisso ske/a- (Memorie del Laboratorio di linguistica della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa 6). Alessandria: L’Orso.Google Scholar
Carruba, Onofrio (ed.). 1992. Per una grammatica ittita/Towards a Hittite grammar (Studia Mediterranea 7). Pavia: Iuculano.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela. 2006. The rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin fieri and facere as passive auxiliaries. In Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology: form and function (Typological Studies in Language 68), 311–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotticelli Kurras, Paola. 1991. Das hethitische Verbum ‘sein’: Syntaktische Untersuchungen (Texte der Hethiter 18). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
. 1992. Die hethitischen Nominalsätze. Carruba (ed.), 99–135.Google Scholar
. 2015. Periphrastic constructions, phasal verbs, and Aktionsart in Hittite. InVerbis 1. 43–62.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: aspects and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dardano, Paola. 2005. I costrutti perifrastici con il verbo ḫar(k)- dell’ittito: stato della questione e prospettive di metodo. Orientalia 74. 93–113.Google Scholar
. 2014. Das hethitische Partizip – eine Frage der Diathese? In Piotr Taracha (ed.) with the assistance of Magdalena Kapeluś, Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Hittitology, Warsaw, 5–9 September 2011, 236–262. Warsaw: Agade.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Timothy R. 2015. Verbal reduplication in Anatolian. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Doiz-Bienzobas, Aintzane. 2002. The preterite and the imperfect as grounding predications. In Frank Brisard (ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (Cognitive Linguistics Research 21), 299–347. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang. 1968. Studien zur verbalen Pluralität. Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im Lateinischen und Hethitischen (Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 259, 1). Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Engerer, Volkmar. 2014. Phases in verbal semantics. In Klaus Robering (ed.), Events, arguments and aspects: Topics in the semantics of verbs (Studies in Language Companion Series 152), 227–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frotscher, Michael. 2013. Das hethitische -ant-Partizip und seine indogermanischen Grundlagen. Semantik, Morphologie, Syntax. Verona: Università degli Studi di Verona dissertation.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew J. 1996. Wackernagel’s Law and Unaccusativity in Hittite. In Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena (CSLI Lecture Notes 61), 85–133. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1982. Tense-Aspect-Modality: The Creole prototype and beyond. In Paul J. Hopper (ed.), Tense-Aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics. Containing the contributions to a Symposium on Tense and Aspect, held at UCLA, May 1979 (Typological Studies in Language 1), 115–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harry, J. E. 1905. The perfect subjunctive, optative and imperative in Greek. Classical Review 19. 347–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14. 25–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Periphrasis. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 17.1), 654–664. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
HED = Puhvel, Jaan. 1984. Hittite etymological dictonary, vol. 1–2 (Trends in linguistics. Documentation 1). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. Jr. & H. Craig Melchert. 2008. A grammar of the Hittite language. Part I: reference grammar (Languages of the Ancient Near East 1). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Houwink ten Cate, Philo H. J. 1973. Impersonal and reflexive constructions of the predicative participle in Hittite. In Martin Adrianus Beek, Arie A. Kapman, Cornelis Nijland & Jaques Ryckmans (eds.), Symbolae biblicae et mesopotamicae Francisco Mario Theodoro de Liagre Böhl dedicatae (Studia Francisci Scholten memoriae dicata 4), 199–210. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Huggard, Mattyas G. 2015. Wh-words in Hittite: A study in syntax-semantics and syntax-phonology interfaces. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
HW2 = Friedrich, Johannes, Annelies Kammenhuber & Inge Hoffmann. 2007. Hethitisches Wörterbuch, vol. 3.1 ḫa-ḫaz (Indogermanische Bibliothek: Reihe 2: Wörterbücher) Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Inglese, Guglielmo. 2020. The Hittite middle voice: synchrony, diachrony, typology. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inglese, Guglielmo & Simone Mattiola. Forthcoming. The Hittite suffix -ške/a- between verbal aspect and pluractionality: a typological approach. To appear in STUF - Linguistic Typology and Universals.
Jasanoff, Jay H. 2003. Hittite and the Indo-European verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. What happened to the Perfect in Hittite? A contribution to the theory of the *h2e-conjugation. In Elisabeth Rieken (ed.), 100 Jahre Entzifferung des Hethitischen: morphosyntaktische Kategorie in Sprachgeschichte und Forschung. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 23 September 2015 in Marburg, 137–156. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2008. Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 5). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LIV2 = Rix, Helmut. 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1998. Sintassi comparata dell’accordo participiale romanzo (Linguistica 17). Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 1990. Old Hittite sentence structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1997. Hittite (Languages of the World. Materials 114). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 1998. I verbi ausiliari in ittita. In Giuliano Bernini, Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Ars Linguistica: studi offerti da colleghi ed allievi a Paolo Ramat in occasione del suo 60. compleanno, 299–322. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
. 2010. Transitivity, intransitivity and diathesis in Hittite. ИНДОЕВРОПЕЙСКОЕ ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ФИЛОЛОГИЯ [Indo-European linguistics and classical philology] 16. 133–154.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia, Anna Pompei & Stavros Skopeteas. 2005. Ancient Greek (Languages of the World. Materials 213). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Claudia Parodi. 2008. Key terms in syntax and syntactic theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Melchert, Craig. H. 1997. Traces of a PIE Aspectual Contrast in Anatolian? Incontri Linguistici 20. 83–92.Google Scholar
Melchert, Craig H. 2003. Language. In Craig H. Melchert (ed.), The Luwians (Handbook of Oriental Studies 1: The Near and Middle East 68), 170–210. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. The medio-passive in transition from Old to New Hittite. To appear in a forthcoming Festschrift.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir. P. 2001. Resultative constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals, vol. II (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20/2), 928–940. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Neu, Erich. 1968. Das hethitische Mediopassiv und seine indogermanischen Grundlagen (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 6). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Reichmuth, Silvio. 2011. Mita von Pahhuwa (CTH 146). In Robert Fischer, Detlev Groddek, & Henning Marquardt (eds.), Hethitologie in Dresden: Textbearbeitungen, Arbeiten zur Forschungs- und Schriftgeschichte (Dresdner Beiträge zur Hethitologie 35), 109–143. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard & Albert Debrunner. 1950. Griechische Grammatik auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns griechischer Grammatik. Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft 2.1.2). Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Sidelstev, Andrej V. 2015. The riddle of Hittite indefinite pronouns. Altorientalische Forschungen 42. 199–275.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66. 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä. 2019. Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Kim, Ronald I.
2024. The Ossetic transitive preterite. Journal of Historical Linguistics DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo
2022. How do middle voice markers and valency reducing constructions interact? Typological tendencies and diachronic considerations. Folia Linguistica 56:2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Luraghi, Silvia, Guglielmo Inglese & Daniel Kölligan
2021. The passive voice in ancient Indo-European languages: inflection, derivation, periphrastic verb forms. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2 ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo & Simone Mattiola
2020. Pluractionality in Hittite. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:2 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.