Cover not available
Part of
Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond
Edited by Robert Crellin and Thomas Jügel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352] 2020
► pp. 615–634

Chapter 18
The perfect in context in texts in English, Sistani Balochi and New Testament Greek

 | SIL International
English and Sistani Balochi are tense-prominent languages, and use the perfect mainly to elaborate on an existing topic by referring to a past state of affairs that is of relevance to that topic. English perfects also introduce new topics that the speaker wishes to address, while Balochi uses perfects with a mirative to introduce entities to a narrative and as a forward-pointing device in orienters that introduce reported speeches. New Testament Greek is aspect-prominent, which partly explains why English translates some Greek aorists (perfectives) with perfects. The Greek perfect often introduces restatements of past events or speeches. In passages with aorist-perfect alternation, it is also used in a marked way with added implicatures. Towards the end of a passage, assertions in the perfect often clinch the argument and/or are climactic. Near the beginning of a narrative passage, in contrast, the perfect, as in Balochi, is a forward-pointing device, highlighting what follows.
Keywords: Tense- versus Aspect-prominent, Default versus marked usages
Article outline
  • 1.The perfect in context: English
  • 2.The perfect in context: Sistani Balochi
  • 3.The perfect in context: New Testament Greek
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 September 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.352.18lev
References (32)
References
Alford, Henry. 1883. The Greek Testament Vol. I, containing the Four Gospels, new edn. London: Rivingtons.Google Scholar
Barjasteh Delforooz, Behrooz. 2010. Discourse Features in Balochi of Sistan (Oral Narratives) (Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 15). Revised online edn. at: [URL]. (April 3, 2017.)
Barjasteh Delforooz, Behrooz & Stephen H. Levinsohn. 2014. The third person singular pronominal clitic in Balochi of Sistan: A progress report. Studia Iranica 43. 203–220.Google Scholar
Bhat, Darbhe N. Shankara. 1999. The prominence of tense, aspect and mood (Studies in Language Companion Series 49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binnick, Robert L. (ed.). 2012. The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Constantine R. 2008. Basics of verbal aspect in Biblical Greek. Grand Rapids MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Crellin, Robert. 2016. The semantics of the perfect in the Greek of the New Testament. In Runge & Fresch (eds.), 430–457.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nicholas J. 2016. Aspect-prominence, morpho-syntax, and a cognitive-linguistic framework for the Greek verb. In Runge & Fresch (eds.), 122–160.Google Scholar
Fanning, Buist M. 1990. Verbal aspect in New Testament Greek. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August. 1991. Translation and relevance: Cognition and context. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2012. Evidentiality and Mirativity. In Binnick (ed.), 1020–1046.Google Scholar
Levinsohn, Stephen H. 2000. Discourse features of New Testament Greek: A coursebook on the information structure of New Testament Greek, 2nd edn. Dallas TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
2015. Self-instruction materials on narrative discourse analysis. [URL]. (April 3, 2017.)
2016. Gnomic aorists: No problem! The Greek indicative verb system as four ordered pairs. In Israel M. Gallarte & Jesús Peláez (eds.), Mari via tua: Philological studies in honour of Antonio Piñero (Estudios de filología neotestamentaria 11), 183–196. Córdoba: Ediciones el Almendro.Google Scholar
Levinsohn, Stephen H. & Maryam Nourzaei. 2015. The perfect as a rhetorical device in reported conversations in Sistani Balochi oral folktales. 6th International Conference on Iranian Linguistics, Tbilisi, June 2015. [URL]. (April 3, 2017.)
Lindstedt, Juoko. 2000. The perfect—aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20–6), 365–383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morris, Leon. 1969. The Revelation of St. John (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries 20). London: Tyndale Press.Google Scholar
New International Version (NIV). 1993. London: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd.Google Scholar
New Living Translation, 2nd edn. 2004. Wheaton, IL.: Tyndale Charitable Trust.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Astuko & Jean-Pierre Koenig. 2006. The perfect in context: A corpus study. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12. 265–278.Google Scholar
Nourzaei, Maryam. 2017. Participant reference in three Balochi dialects: Male and female narrations of folktales and biographical tales (Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 31). Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala. [URL]
Orriens, Sander. 2009. Involving the past in the present: The Classical Greek perfect as a situating cohesion device. In Stéphanie J. Bakker & Gerry C. Wakker (eds.), Discourse cohesion in Ancient Greek (Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 16), 221–239. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Oswalt, John H. 1998. The book of Isaiah, chapters 40–66. The New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. 1992. Idioms of the Greek New Testament (Biblical languages. Greek series 2). Sheffield: JSOT Press.Google Scholar
2009. Prominence: A theoretical overview. In Stanley E. Porter & Matthew Brook O’Donnell (eds.), The Linguist as Pedagogue: Trends in the Teaching and Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament (New Testament monographs 11), 45–74. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Ritz, Marie-Eve. 2012. Perfect tense and aspect. In Binnick (ed.), 881–907.Google Scholar
Robertson, Archibald T. 1919. A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, 3rd edn. New York: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Runge, Steven E. 2016. Discourse function of the Greek perfect. In Runge & Fresch (eds.), 458–485.Google Scholar
Runge, Steven E. & Christopher J. Fresch (eds.). 2016. The Greek verb revisited: A fresh approach for biblical exegesis. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.Google Scholar
De Swart, Henriëtte. 2007. A crosslinguistic discourse analysis of the perfect. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 2273–2307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Nigel. 1963. Syntax. A Grammar of New Testament Greek J. H. Moulton, vol. III. Edinburgh: Clark.Google Scholar