Chapter published in:
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 1739
References

References

Ackerman, Farrell & Irina Nikolaeva
2013Descriptive typology and linguistic theory. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell & Gert Webelhuth
1998A theory of predicates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf
2009Parts and wholes. Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In James P. Blevins and Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in Grammar. Form and Acquisition, 54–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alhoniemi, Alho
1985Marin kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura.Google Scholar
Anderson, Steven R.
2016Synchronic vs. diachronic explanation and the nature of the language faculty. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 11–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arkhangelskiy, Timofey & Maria Usacheva
2015Syntactic and morphosyntactic properties of postpositional phrases in Beserman Udmurt as part-of-speech criteria. SKY Journal of Linguistics 28. 103–137.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
2016A fox knows many things but a hedgehog one big thing. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory T. Stump (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 186–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Darwinism tested by the science of language. In Claire C. Bowern, Larry Horn & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On looking into words (and beyond): Structures, Relations, Analyses, 443–455. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles J.
1996Essays on time-based linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balari, Sergio, Lorenzo Giullermo & Sonia Sultan
2020Language acquisition and EcoDevo processes: The case of the lexicon‑syntax interface. Biological Theory 15(3). 148–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, Robin C.
1994A lexical model of morphological change. Cambridge: Harvard University dissertation.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah
1997The hedgehog and the fox: An essay of Tolstay’s view of history. In Henry Hardy (ed.), The proper study of mankind: An anthology of essays, 436–498. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Bickel, Bathasar & Fernando Zúñiga
2017The ‘word’ in polysynthetic languages: Phonological and syntactic challenges. In Michael Fortescu, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 158–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, James. P.
2016Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James, Farrell Ackerman, Robert Malouf & Michael Ramscar
2016Morphology as an adaptive discriminative system. In Daniel Sidiqqi & Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 271–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James, Petar Milin & Michael Ramscar
2017The Zipfian paradigm cell filling problem. In Ferenc Kiefer, James P. Blevins & Huba Bartos (eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization, 141–158. Leiden: Brill Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
1994A phonological and morphological reanalysis of the Māori passive. Te Reo 37. 29–53.Google Scholar
2004Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bochner, Harry
1993Simplicity in generative grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier
2015Periphrasis as collocation. Morphology 25(1). 63–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Jana Strnadová
2019Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29(2). 167–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camazine, Scott, Jean-Louis Deneubourg, Nigel R. Franks, James Sneyd, Eric Bonabeau & Guy Theraula
2001Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton Studies in Complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csúcs, Sándor
1990Chrestomathia votiacica. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles
1871The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Depew, David J. & Bruce Weber
1994Darwinism evolving. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
1987Drift and selective mechanisms in morphological changes: The Eastern Nilotic case. In Anna G. Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), 7th international conference on historical linguistics, 193–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo-Saharan languages. Anthropological Linguistics, 214–261.Google Scholar
2011Historical linguistics and the comparative study of African languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. & Aleksandra Y. Aikhenvald
(eds.) 2003Word: A cross-linguistic typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, Micha, Andrea D. Sims, Alexander Erdmann, Antonio Hernandez, Evan Jaffe, Lifeng Jin, Martha Booker Johnson, et al.
2019Modeling morphological learning, typology, and change: What can the neural sequence-to-sequence framework contribute?. Journal of Language Modelling 7(1). 53–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fertig, David & Paul J. Hopper
(eds.) 2015Hermann Paul’s Principles of Language History Revisited: Translations and Reflections, Volume 51. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Scott F. & Sahotra Sarkar
2000Embracing complexity: Organicism for the 21st century. Developmental dynamics: An official publication of the American Association of Anatomists 219(1). 1–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Gilbert
1997Synthesizing nature-nurture: Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul
2011Our plastic nature. In Snaiy Gissis, Snait B. Gissis & Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From subtle fluids to molecular, 319–330. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth
1968Review of Hohepa 1967. Journal of the Polynesian Society 77. 83–99.Google Scholar
1973Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: An Australian example. In Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Current trends in linguistics 11. 401–458. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Harlow, Ray
2007Māori: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C.
2008On the explanation of typologically unusual structures. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 54–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Multiple exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2011aThe gradual coalescence into “words” in grammaticalization. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 342–355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011bThe indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1). 31–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
1998On the richness of paradigms, and the insufficiency of underlying representations in accounting for them. Handout of presentation given at Stanford University.
Henle, Mary
1971The selected papers of Wolgang Köhler. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1975Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51(3). 639–671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox
2010The mirage of a space between nature and nurture. North Carolina: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kel’makov, Valentin & Sara Hännikäinen
1999Udmurtin kielioppia ja harjoituksia. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Charles Kisseberth
1979Generative phonology: Description and theory. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kruszewski, Mikoɬaj
1995Writings in general linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger
1997Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewy, Ernst
1911Zur finno-ugrischen Wort und Satzverbindung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar
Locke, John L.
2009Evolutionary developmental linguistics: Naturalization of the faculty of language. Language Sciences 31(1). 33–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luutonen, Juola
1997The variation of morpheme order in Mari declension. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Marzi, Claudia, Marcello Ferro & Vito Pirrelli
2019A processing-oriented investigation of inflectional complexity. Frontiers in Communication 4(48). 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
1991Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Freek Van de Velde
(eds.) 2016Exaptation and language change, Volume 336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overton, Willis F. & Peter C. M. Molenaar
2015Concepts, theory and method in developmental science. In Willis F. Overton & Peter Molenaar (eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science; Volume 1: Theory and method, 9–62. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1970 [1890]Principles of the history of language. College Park: McGrath Publishing Company. Translated from the 2nd edition by Herbert Augustus Strong.Google Scholar
Ramscar, Michael, Melody Dye, James. P. Blevins & Harald Baayen
2018Morphological development. In Amalia Bar-On & Dorit Ravid (eds.), Handbook of communications disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistic perspectives, 181–202. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riese, Timothy, Jeremy Bradley, Emma Yakimova & Galina Krylova
2012A comprehensive introduction to the Mari language. University of Vienna, Department of Finno-Ugric Studies: Electronic Version available at https://​www​.univie​.ac​.at​/maridict​/site​-2014​/book​.php​?int​=0
Robins, Robert H.
1959In defense of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society. 58(1). 116–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Gerald
1990On the analysis and implications of Māori verb alternations. Lingua 80(2–3). 149–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and company.Google Scholar
Schwegler, Armin
1990Analyticity and syntheticity: A diachronic perspective with special reference to Romance languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Andrea D.
2015Inflectional defectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sproat, R. W., & Wilkes, M. V.
(1992) Morphology and computation. MIT press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sultan, Sonia
2015Organism and environment: Ecological development, niche construction and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tallman, Adam J.
2019Beyond grammatical and phonological words. Language and Linguistics Compass 14. 1–14.Google Scholar
Thelen, Esther & Elizabeth Bates
2003Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different? Developmental Science 6(4). 378–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U.
1987System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Wili Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl & Wolfgang U. Wurzel (eds.), Leitmotifs in natural morphology, 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar