Cover not available
Part of
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 199–214

Chapter 11
Competition in comparatives

A look at Romance scenarios

ORCID logo | Università dell’Aquila
This chapter provides an initial exploration of the phenomenon of competition in comparatives in Romance languages. Latin had both synthetic and periphrastic comparatives, whose distribution was phonologically conditioned. Romance languages have generalized the periphrastic construction to all adjectives, but have also often inherited continuants of all or some of the four synthetic suppletive comparatives melior “better”, peior “worse”, māior “bigger”, minor “smaller”. Therefore, in the evolution from Latin to Romance languages, the stage is set for competition between synthetic and analytic constructions, such as Italian migliore vs. più buono “better”. This chapter discusses the solutions found in different Romance languages, as explained in descriptive grammars and other works. These solutions span from extinction of the synthetic suppletive forms altogether, to blocking of the analytic construction when the synthetic one is available, to overabundance between synthetic and analytic forms, to the creation of niches in which the two constructions distribute differentially. A corpus-based pilot study of Italian suggests a fruitful way to uncover such niches.
Keywords: comparative, suppletive comparative, synthetic comparative, analytic comparative, competition, niche, Romance languages, migliore, più buono
Article outline
  • 1.Comparatives from Latin to Romance
  • 2.Synthetic and analytic expression of ‘better’, ‘worse’, ‘bigger’ and ‘smaller’ in Romance: Theoretical possibilities and descriptions in grammars
    • 2.1Scenario 1: The analytic construction blocks the synthetic construction
    • 2.2Scenario 2: The synthetic construction blocks the analytic construction
    • 2.3Scenario 3: Both constructions exist, and are used interchangeably
    • 2.4Scenario 4: Both constructions exist, and are used in different contexts
      • 2.4.1Concrete vs. abstract meaning
      • 2.4.2Elevated vs. informal register
      • 2.4.3Specific senses of the base adjective
        • 2.4.3.1‘Younger’ and ‘older’
        • 2.4.3.2‘Smaller in size’ and ‘bigger in size’
        • 2.4.3.3‘Good-natured, kind’
      • 2.4.4Set phrases
    • 2.5Interim conclusions
  • 3.Più buono vs. migliore in Italian: Niches
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.11tho
References (35)
References
Alcina Franch, Juan & José Manuel Blecua. 1975. Gramática española. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 2016. Romansh (Rumantsch). In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 169–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 2016. Competition and the lexicon. In Annibale Elia, Claudio Iacobini & Miriam Voghera (eds.), Livelli di analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia: Atti del XLVII Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI), 39–51. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
. 2019. Competitors and alternants in linguistic morphology. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation, 39–66. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2012. Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (1st edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brăescu, Raluca. 2013. Adjectives and adjectival phrases. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), The grammar of Romanian, 410–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butt, John & Carmen Benjamin. 1988. A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 2011. Comparative and superlative. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives in historical Latin syntax, Volume 4: Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology, 495–605. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio, Federico Mancini, Massimo Vedovelli & Miriam Voghera. 1993. Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milan: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
Elton, Charles S. 1927. Animal ecology. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice. 1986. Le bon usage. Grammaire française. Douzième édition refondue par André Goosse. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice & André Goosse. 1980. Nouvelle grammaire française. Paris & Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Herman, Jozsef. 2000. Vulgar Latin. Translated by Roger Wright. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hertz, Martin (ed.). 1855. Prisciani institutionum grammaticarum libri I-XII. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Judge, Anne & F. G. Healey. 1995. A reference grammar of modern French. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC.Google Scholar
Kattán-Ibarra, Juan & Christopher J. Pountain. 1997. Modern Spanish grammar. A practical guide. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam & Martin Maiden (eds.). 2016. The Oxford guide to the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele & Tania Paciaroni. 2016. The dialects of central Italy. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 228–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2011. Morphophonological innovation. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages: Structures, vol. I, 216–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016a. Romanian, Istro-Romanian, Megleno-Romanian and Aromanian. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 91–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. Dalmatian. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 126–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Cecilia Robustelli. 2000. A reference grammar of modern Italian. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Maltby, Robert. 2016. Analytic and synthetic forms of the comparative and superlative from early to late Latin. In James Noel Adams & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Early and late Latin. Continuity or change?, 340–366. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mensching, Guido & Eva-Maria Remberger. 2016. Sardinian. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 270–291. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno. 1952. Grammatica italiana. Florence: le Monnier.Google Scholar
OED. December 2020. Niche, n. and adj. OED Online. Oxford University Press, [URL]. (29 December, 2020).
Oliviéri, Michèle & Patrick Sauzet. 2016. Southern-Gallo-Romance (Occitan). In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 319–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann. 1900. Vom Suppletivwesen der indogermanischen Sprachen: Erweiterte akademische Rede; akademische Rede zur Feier des Geburtsfestes des höchstseligen Grossherzogs Karl Friedrich am 22. November 1899. Heidelberg: Wolff.Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 2002. History of the Spanish language (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2011. Morphosyntactic persistence. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages: Structures, Volume 1, 318–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo & Laura Vanelli. 2004. Nuova grammatica italiana. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Santilli, Enzo. 2014. Italian comparatives: A case of overabundance? L’Aquila, Italy: University of L’Aquila bachelor’s thesis. Available at [URL] (21 October 2019).
Serianni, Luca. (with Alberto Castelvecchi). 1988. Grammatica italiana. Italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Suoni forme costrutti. Turin: Utet.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna M. 2019. Overabundance: A canonical typology. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation, 223–258. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Max W., Alan Yates & Nicolau Dols. 1999. Catalan: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

KANWIT, MATTHEW & JUAN BERRÍOS
2023. Corpora, Cognition, and Usage‐Based Approaches. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.