Chapter published in:
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 215236
References

References

Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013Varieties of morphological defaults and exceptions. Special issue of ReVEL 7. 84–97, http://​www​.revel​.inf​.br​/files​/8596b454a730ddbf4903e41aee04a0b8​.pdf (10 August 2019).
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett
2005The syntax-morphology interface. A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bond, Oliver
2019Canonical typology. In Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 409–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Dunstan
2016Defaults and overrides in morphological description. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 272–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Dunstan & Andrew Hippisley
2012Network Morphology: A defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardarelli, Luigino
2010Le parole ritrovate. [s.l.] [s.n.].Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1991Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2009Canonical inflectional classes. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes: Morphology in Bordeaux, 1–11. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. http://​www​.lingref​.com​/cpp​/decemb​/6​/paper2231​.html (17 April, 2021).
2012Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. & Norman M. Fraser
1993Network Morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics 29(1). 113–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Default genders. In Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen, Tertu Nevalainen & Mirja Saari (eds.), Genders in grammar and cognition, 55–97. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Achille, Paolo, & Anna M. Thornton
2003La flessione del nome dall’italiano antico all’italiano contemporaneo. In Nicoletta Maraschio & Teresa Poggi Salani (eds.), Italia linguistica anno Mille, Italia linguistica anno Duemila, 211–230. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
DAI = Loporcaro, Michele, Tania Paciaroni, Diego Pescarini, Alice Idone, Serena Romagnoli, Chiara Zanini & Taras Zakharko
2020The Zurich Database of Agreement in Italo-Romance. University of Zurich, http://​www​.dai​.uzh​.ch
D’Alessandro, Roberta
2017When you have too many features: Auxiliaries, agreement and clitics in Italian varieties. Glossa. A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Agreement across the board: Topic agreement in Ripano. In Peter W. Smith, Katharina Hartmann & Johannes Mursell (eds.), Agree to agree: Agreement in the minimalist programme, 235–270. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett
2002The semantics of gender in Mayali: Partially parallel systems and formal implementation. Language 78. 111–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedden, Sebastian & Greville G. Corbett
2017Gender and classifiers in concurrent systems: Refining the typology of nominal classification. Glossa. A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Andrew Hippisley
2017aDefaults in linguistics. In Nikolas Gisborne & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Defaults in morphological theory, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2017bDefaults in morphological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harder, Andreas
1988Laut- und Formenlehre der Mundart von Ripatransone. Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel dissertation.Google Scholar
Lambertelli, Giulio
2003Elementi di fonetica, ortografia e grammatica della parlata ripana con doppia versione di “J’sè d lu Rr’tì”. Acquaviva Picena (AP): Edizioni Lambertelli.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012From Latin to Romance. Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele
2018Gender from Latin to Romance: history, geography, typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
To appear. Nouns as agreement targets in Romance: Inflection and derivation. In Martina Werner & Wolfgang U. Dressler eds. Between Derivation and Inflection Vienna ÖAW-Verlag
Loporcaro, Michele & Tania Paciaroni
2011Four-gender systems in Indo-European. Folia Linguistica 45(2). 389–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lüdtke, Helmut
1976La declinazione dei verbi in un dialetto di transizione marchigiano-abruzzese. Abruzzo 16(3). 79–84.Google Scholar
Mancini, Anna Maria
1993Le caratteristiche morfosintattiche del dialetto di Ripatransone (AP), alla luce di nuove ricerche. In Sanzio Balducci (ed.), I dialetti delle Marche meridionali, 111–136. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Paciaroni, Tania
2020Ripano. University of Zurich, http://​www​.dai​.uzh​.ch​/ripatransone​.html (12 February 2020.)
Paciaroni, Tania & Michele Loporcaro
2018Overt gender marking depending on syntactic context in Ripano. In Sebastian Fedden, Jenny Audring & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Non-canonical gender systems, 147–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parrino, Flavio
1967Su alcune particolarità della coniugazione nel dialetto di Ripatransone. L’Italia dialettale 30. 156–166.Google Scholar
Rossi, Alfredo
1999’Ne ’mbize dë perola. Poesie e sonetti in lingua dialettale di Ripatransone 2a raccolta. Ripatransone: Maroni.Google Scholar
2007Une tire ’n-atre… comma lë cëriescia! Poesie, sonetti ed altro in lingua dialettale di Ripatransone. 4a raccolta. Ripatransone: Maroni.Google Scholar
2008Dizionario del dialetto Ripano. Ripatransone: [s.n.] (Centobuchi di Monteprandone: Linea grafica).Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna M.
2019How (non-)canonical is Italian morphology? In Matthew Baerman, Oliver Bond & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Morphological perspectives. Papers in honour of Greville G. Corbett, 65–99. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar