Chapter published in:
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 239254


Allan, Robin, Philip Holmes & Tom Lundskær-Nielsen
2000Danish: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arkadjev, Peter M.
2009Poor (two-term) case systems: Limits of neutralization. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 686–699. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew
2019Feature duality. In Matthew Baerman, Oliver Bond & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Morphological perspectives. Papers in honour of Greville G. Corbett, 124–137. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier, Robert D. Borsley & Maggie Tallerman
2016On pseudo-non-finite clauses in Welsh. In Doug Arnold, Miriam Butt, Berthold Crysmann, Tracy Holloway King & Stefan Müller (eds.), Proceedings of the Joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, 104–124. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé
2008Paradigm shape is morphomic in Nepali. Paper presented at the 13th Internation Morphology Meeting, Vienna.
2010Opaque paradigms, transparent forms in Nepali conjugation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Theoretical Morphology 5, Lutherstadt, Wittenberg.
Bonami, Olivier & Gregory Stump
2016Paradigm Function Morphology. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 449–481. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
1996Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyé, Gilles & Gauvain Schalchli
2019Realistic data and paradigms: The paradigm cell finding problem. Morphology 19. 199–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crysmann, Berthold & Olivier Bonami
2016Variable morphotactics in Information-based Morphology. Journal of Linguistics 52. 311–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Round, Erich
2015Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes and metamorphomes. In Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Understanding and measuring morphological complexity, 29–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, Louisa & Andrew Spencer
2001Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000, 71–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
2008Does Hungarian have a case system? In Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations, 322–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Realization-based morphosyntax: The German genitive. In Patrick O. Steinkrüger & Manfred Krifka (eds.), On inflection, 173–218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013Lexical relatedness: A paradigm-based model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Stems, the morphome, and meaning-bearing inflection. In Ana R. Luís & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds.), The morphome debate: Diagnosing and analysing morphomic patterns, 207–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Inflection and derivation. In Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie & Gergana Popova (eds.), Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, 243–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory
2001Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Morphological and syntactic paradigms: Arguments for a theory of paradigm linkage. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 147–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006A theory of heteroclite inflectional paradigms. Language 82. 279–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Inflectional paradigms. Content and form at the syntax-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar