Chapter published in:
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 255278
References

References

Anderson, Stephen R.
1992A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bilgin, Orhan
2016Frequency effects in the processing of morphologically complex Turkish words. Istanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
2005The grammar of words. Oxford: Oxford University of Press.Google Scholar
2010Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Driem, George van
1987A grammar of Limbu. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Favereau, Francis
1997Grammaire du breton contemporain. Morlaix: Skol Vreizh.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C.
2017Multiple exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1995The growth of affixes in morphological reanalysis. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1994, 1–29. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kempf, Luise & Stefan Hartmann
2018Schema unification and morphological productivity: A diachronic perspective. In Geert E. Booij (ed.), The construction of words: Advances in Construction Morphology, 441–474. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kervella, F.
1976Yezhadur bras ar brezhoneg. Brest: Al Liamm.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, L.
1908Grammaire bretonne du dialecte de Tréguier. Saint-Brieuc: René Prud’homme.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H.
1972Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, T. J.
2015Productivity and reuse in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory
2001Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Inflectional paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017aPolyfunctionality and the variety of inflectional exponence relations. In Ferenc Kiefer, James P. Blevins & Huba Bartos (eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization: Data and analyses, 11–30. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017bRule conflation in an inferential-realizational theory of morphotactics. Acta Linguistica Academica 64(1). 79–124. [http://​akademiai​.com​/loi​/2062] Crossref
2017cRules and blocks. In Claire Bowern, Laurence Horn & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On looking into words (and beyond), 421–440. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
2019aAn apparently noncanonical pattern of morphotactic competition. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation, 259–278. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019bSome sources of apparent gaps in derivational paradigms. Morphology 29. 271–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Complex exponents. In Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Complex words: Advances in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
To appear. Rule conflation, potentiation, affix telescoping. In Andrea Sims et al. eds Morphological typology and linguistic cognition Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Teddiman, Laura Gene Helena
2012An experimental investigation of complexity-based ordering. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta dissertation.Google Scholar
Trépos, Pierre
N.d. Grammaire bretonne. Rennes: Ouest France.
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1985How to describe inflection. In Mary Niepokuj, Mary Van Clay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 372–386. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar