Cover not available
Part of
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 255–278

Chapter 14
Conditional exponence

ORCID logo | Emeritus, University of Kentucky
In inferential-realizational theories of morphology, the content realized by the application of a rule of exponence is customarily assumed to be invariant across the range of contexts in which that rule applies. Yet, there are morphomic exponents whose content is sensitive to context; Breton verb inflection presents striking examples of exponents of this sort. I argue that the patterns of context dependency presented by such exponents are an effect of the phenomenon of rule combination, by which simple rules of morphology may combine to form more complex rules. Some rule combinations involve ordinary rule composition; the properties of a combination of this sort are deducible from those of its component rules. Other rule combinations are supplementational; a combination of this sort possesses one or more properties that are not deducible from those of its component rules. As I show, the Breton examples of conditional exponence involve supplementational rule combination. I elucidate this claim formally and discuss its wider implications for morphological theory.
Keywords: conditional exponence, morphome, rule combination, rule composition, rule of exponence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Exponence can be conditional
  • 2.Conditional exponence in Breton verb inflection
  • 3.What is rule combination?
    • Asymmetrical rule oppositions
    • Dependent rules
    • Processing frequent affix sequences
  • 4.Conditional exponence as a kind of rule combination
  • 5.A formal analysis of conditional exponence Breton verb inflection
  • 6.Conclusions
  • 7.Appendix: Further implications of rule combination in Breton
    • Irregular verbs
    • Conjugating prepositions
    • Dialectal variation
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 25 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.14stu
References (26)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bilgin, Orhan. 2016. Frequency effects in the processing of morphologically complex Turkish words. Istanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2005. The grammar of words. Oxford: Oxford University of Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Driem, George van. 1987. A grammar of Limbu. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Favereau, Francis. 1997. Grammaire du breton contemporain. Morlaix: Skol Vreizh.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2017. Multiple exponence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The growth of affixes in morphological reanalysis. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1994, 1–29. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempf, Luise & Stefan Hartmann. 2018. Schema unification and morphological productivity: A diachronic perspective. In Geert E. Booij (ed.), The construction of words: Advances in Construction Morphology, 441–474. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kervella, F. 1976. Yezhadur bras ar brezhoneg. Brest: Al Liamm.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, L. 1908. Grammaire bretonne du dialecte de Tréguier. Saint-Brieuc: René Prud’homme.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 1972. Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, T. J. 2015. Productivity and reuse in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2001. Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Inflectional paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017a. Polyfunctionality and the variety of inflectional exponence relations. In Ferenc Kiefer, James P. Blevins & Huba Bartos (eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization: Data and analyses, 11–30. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Rule conflation in an inferential-realizational theory of morphotactics. Acta Linguistica Academica 64(1). 79–124. [[URL]] DOI logo
. 2017c. Rules and blocks. In Claire Bowern, Laurence Horn & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On looking into words (and beyond), 421–440. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
. 2019a. An apparently noncanonical pattern of morphotactic competition. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation, 259–278. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019b. Some sources of apparent gaps in derivational paradigms. Morphology 29. 271–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Complex exponents. In Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Complex words: Advances in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. To appear. Rule conflation, potentiation, affix telescoping. In Andrea Sims et al. (eds), Morphological typology and linguistic cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teddiman, Laura Gene Helena. 2012. An experimental investigation of complexity-based ordering. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta dissertation.Google Scholar
Trépos, Pierre. N.d. Grammaire bretonne. Rennes: Ouest France.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. How to describe inflection. In Mary Niepokuj, Mary Van Clay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 372–386. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar