Cover not available
Part of
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 289–304

Chapter 16
In further pursuit of the adjective

Evidence from the Siouan language Osage

| University of Oklahoma
The Osage language is shown to have a lexical category Adjective based primarily on morphological and secondarily on syntactic evidence. The hypothesis with the most currency is that Siouan predicates are either active or stative verbs, and that given the lack of distinguishing morphology, adjectives cannot be classified as separate from stative verbs. I show that Osage treats adjectives differently from stative verbs in compound formation, in noun phrase modification, as clausal predicates, and in the exponence of Scale. The number of predicates that could be thus classified as adjectives seems to be larger than those in some other Siouan languages such as Hocąk and Lakota.
Keywords: Osage, Siouan, adjectives, lexical properties
Article outline
  • 1.Outline of the problem
  • 2.Three pertinent hallmarks of Siouan and other American languages
  • 3.Related work on Siouan adjectives
  • 4.Varieties of compounded nouns in Osage
  • 5.Phrasal modification
  • 6.Clausal predicates: Adjectives or stative verbs?
    • 6.1Stative-like predicates without subject agreement
    • 6.2Stative-like predicates with use of copula
    • 6.3Subjects of adjectival predicates without subject markers
  • 7.The property Scale
  • 8.Adjective derivation from verbs
  • 9.Summary of distinctions between Osage verbs and adjectives
  • 10.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.16haa
References (14)
References
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2003. Lexical categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In Petra Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds), Approaches to the typology of word classes, 65–102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haag, Marcia. 1996. Lexical categories in Choctaw and Universal Grammar. Stony Brook, NY: Stony Brook University dissertation.Google Scholar
. 1998. Word-level evidence for lexical categories in Salishan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64. 379–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2006. Are there adjectives in Hocąk (Winnebago)? In Ximena Lois & Valentina Vapnarsky (eds), Lexical categories and root classes in Amerindian languages, 289–316. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Quintero, Carolyn. 2004. Osage grammar. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Osage dictionary. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Bryan. 2015. The syntax of adjectives in Hocąk. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Madison dissertation.Google Scholar
Rudin, Catherine. 2020. On lexical and syntactic categories in Omaha-Ponca (Siouan). Paper presented at The Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas (SSILA), New Orleans, LA, January 2–5.