Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 31, Bucharest
Edited by Alexandru Nicolae and Adina Dragomirescu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 355] 2021
► pp. 240261
References

References

Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
2003Voice morphology in the causative–inchoative alternation. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 115–136. Oxford: Oxord University Press.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
2006The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 187–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Gianina Iordăchioaia
2014The psych causative alternation. Lingua 148. 53–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arad, Maya
1998VP-Structure and the syntax-lexicon interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva
2006Implicit arguments. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume 2, 558–588. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, Andrea
2008Italian null objects and resultative/depictive predication. In Emily Elfner & Martin Wakov (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 37, 141–152. Amherst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2004A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 22–59. Oxford: Oxord University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doron, Edit
2003Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11. 1–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1979Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley
2005Flavors of v. In Roumyana Slabakova & Paula Kempchinsky (eds.), Aspectual inquiries, 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Causation, obligation and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 207–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, Heidi Harley & Simin Karimi
2005Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates. Lingua 115. 1365–1401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken & Samuel J. Keyser
1988Explaining and constraining the English middle. In Carol Tenny (ed.), Studies in Generative Approaches to Aspect, 41–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993On the argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Ken Hale & Samuel Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth; Samuel Jay Keyser
1998The Basic Elements of Argument Structure. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32, 73–118.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Samuel J. Keyser
2002Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2012Lexical decomposition in modern syntactic theory. In Wolfram Hinzen, Edouard Machery & Markus Werning (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, 328–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40. 225–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1991Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41. 9–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993Verb classes in English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport-Hovav
1995Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Classifying single argument verbs. In Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion, 269–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77. 766–797. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Lexicalized scales and verbs of scalar change. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the CLS, Chicago, IL, April 8–10.
2012Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds.), The theta system, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
. Manuscript. English object alternations: A unified account. Stanford University 2006.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia
2007On Davidsonian and Kimian states. In Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Syntax and semantics, 107–130. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Mangialavori Rasia, Maria Eugenia
2019Stativity in the causative alternation? New questions and a new variant. Open Linguistics 5. 233–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mangialavori & Marin
2021Psych verb transitivity: the English/Romance crosscut. Talk at Sensus 2. Constructing meaning in Romance. October 1 2021, UMass, Amherst.Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael & Louise McNally
2011Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 467–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane
1989Null objects and non-thematic subjects in middles and tough constructions. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 95–118.Google Scholar
1992Null objects and non-thematic Subjects. Journal of Linguistics 28. 115–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2004Event paths, conflation, argument structure and VP shells. Linguistics 42. 523–571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piñón, Cristopher
2001A finer look at the causative-inchoative alternation. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XI, 346–364. Ithaka: CLC Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2002The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 229–290.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
2003Comparative syntax and language acquisition. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1987The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Susan
1996Events and verb classification. Linguistics 34. 191–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothmayr, Antonia
2009The structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2012Another look at accomplishments and incrementality. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change and state, 60–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russi, Cinzia
2008Italian clitics. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Eunjeong Oh
2007On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar