Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 31, Bucharest
Edited by Alexandru Nicolae and Adina Dragomirescu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 355] 2021
► pp. 278296
References

References

Bonami, Olivier & Danièle Godard
2001Inversion du sujet: Constituance et ordre des mots. In Jean-Marie Marandin (ed.), Cahier Jean-Claude Milner, 117–174. Lagrasse: Verdier.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1986Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott
2019Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. In Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds.), Generative syntax: Questions, crossroads, and challenges (special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics ), 229–261. Barcelona: Universitàt de Barcelona, Servei de Publicacions. Crossref (8 July 2020).Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990Types of Ā-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2014Extraction from DP in Italian revisited. In Enoch Oladé Aboh, Maria Teresa Guasti & Ian Roberts (eds.), Locality, 86–103. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Yordanka Kavalova
2007Parentheticals: An introduction. In Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Godard, Danièle
1992Extraction out of NP in French. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10. 233–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosu, Alexander
1974On the nature of the left branch condition. Linguistic Inquiry 5(2). 308–319.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2001Phases, case and accessibility: The case of extraction from DP in Spanish. In James McCloskey (ed.), Syntax and semantics at Santa Cruz 3, 104–118. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1988Parenthetical adverbials: The Radical orphanage approach. In Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osama Koma & Takao Yagi (eds.), Aspects of modern linguistics: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2011Grammatische Illusionen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 30. 223–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heck, Fabian
2008On pied-piping: Wh-movement and beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009On certain properties of pied-piping. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1). 75–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan
1996Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1983Chains, categories external to S, and French complex inversion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1. 107–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. & Jean-Yves Pollock
1978Stylistic inversion, successive cyclicity, and move NP in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9(4). 595–621.Google Scholar
Kellert, Olga
2017Interrogatives. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, 569–603. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kolliakou, Dimitra
1999 De-phrase extractability and individual/property denotation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17. 713–781. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lalande, Jean Yves
1997Verbstellung im Deutschen und Französischen: Unter Anwendung eines CAD-basierten Expertensystems. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mensching, Guido
2019Extraction from DP in French: A minimalist approach. In Ludovico Franco, Mihaela Moreno & Matthew Reeve (eds.), Agreement, case and locality in the nominal and verbal domains, 249–277. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido & Anja Weingart
2016The null subject parameter and the lexicon in minimalist syntax. In Luis Javier Eguren Gutiérrez, Olga Fernández-Soriano & Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds.), Rethinking parameters, 291–328. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon
2011Constraints on displacement: A phase-based approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Jean-Yves Pollock
2005Quʼest-ce-que (qu)-est-ce-que?: A case study in comparative Romance interrogative syntax. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 542–606. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg
1984On the identification of empty categories. The Linguistic Review 4. 153–202.Google Scholar
1994Aspects de la syntaxe A-barre. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Paris VIII.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3). 365–424.Google Scholar
2006Subject clitics and complex inversion. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume 4, 601–659. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
2004Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, Gilbert C.
2006The Syntax of possessors in the nominal phrase: Drawing the lines and deriving the forms. In Ji-yung Kim, Yuri A. Lander & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, 243–261. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2001Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Ian Roberts
1989Complex inversion in French. Probus 1(1). 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010Varieties of French and the null subject parameter. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 303–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan
1994On two types of underspecification: Towards a feature theory shared by syntax and phonology. Probus 6(2–3). 207–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Safir, Ken
1986Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4). 663–689.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique
1981Bounding nodes in French. The Linguistic Review 1(2). 219–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spyropoulos, Vasillios & Nikolaos Stamatogiannis
2011Subextraction from subjects in Greek: Things that you can thing and you can say. Paper presented at the workshop Islands in Contemporary Linguistic Theory, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 16–18 November 2011. http://​ehutb​.ehu​.es​/uploads​/material​/Video​/1752​/Handout​-Spyropoulos​__​_Stamatogiannis​.pdf (26 June 2018).
Stepanov, Arthur
2007The end of CED? Minimalism and extraction domains. Syntax 10(1). 80–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2004On the edge. In David Adger, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, 261–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2006Strong and weak islands. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume 4, 479–532. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna & Marcel den Dikken
2003Islands. In Lisa Lai Shen Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The second Glot international state-of-the-article book: The latest in linguistics, 213–240. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tellier, Christine
1990Subjacency and subject condition violations in French. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 306–311.Google Scholar
1991Licensing theory and French parasitic gaps. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1988On government. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar