Part of
English Historical Linguistics: Change in structure and meaning
Edited by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone and Graeme Trousdale
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 358] 2022
► pp. 115136
References (61)
Sources
D’Ardenne, Simonne T. R. O. (ed.) 1961. Þe liflade and te passiun of Seinte Juliene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1977. The Katherine Group edited from ms. Bodley 34. Bibliothèque de la Faculté de philosophie et lettres de l’Université de Liège fasc. 215. Paris: Société d’Edition Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Hall, Joseph (ed.) 1972. Selections from Early Middle English 1130–1250, 2nd edn. (1st edn. 1920). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Holthausen, Ferdinand. 1888. Vices and virtues. Part 1. EETS O.S. 89. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Huber, Emily R. & Elizabeth Robertson (eds.). 2016. The Katherine Group: MS Bodley 34. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Medieval Institute Publications (Robbins Library Digital Projects). [URL]
Komen, Erwin. 2011. CorpusStudio, Nijmegen: Radboud University. [URL]
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. The Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, 2nd edn. [URL]
Mc Sparran, Frances, Paul Schaffner, John Latta, Alan Pagliere, Chris Powell & Matt Stoeffler (eds.). 2001. Middle English dictionary, University of Michigan Digital Library Production Service, [URL]
Morris, Richard (ed.). 1969. Old English homilies and homiletic treatises. Part I. EETS O.S. 29, 34. New York: Greenwood Press. Originally published by Trübner (London, 1868).Google Scholar
(ed.). 1873. Old English homilies of the twelfth century. Second series. EETS O.S. 53. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths. 2003. The York–Toronto–Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English prose. York, UK: Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York. Available through the Oxford Text Archive.Google Scholar
References
Allen, Cynthia. 2016. The definite determiner in Early Middle English: What happened with þe?. In Sten Vikner, Henrik Jørgensen & Elly van Gelderen (eds.), Let us have articles betwixt us – Papers in historical and comparative linguistics in honour of Johanna L. Wood, 43–82. Aarhus: Department of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin. 2001. Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. Bergen: University of Bergen PhD dissertation. [URL] (26 February, 2021).
Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax, Band 4. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2005. Changing EPP parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 9(1). 5–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty J. 2006. Inferential relations and noncanonical word order. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory L. Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cloutier, Robert A. 2009. West Germanic OV and VO: The status of exceptions. Utrecht: LOTGoogle Scholar
De Bastiani, Chiara. 2017. Prosody and information structure in Old English: Testing the framework. Linguistica Atlantica 36(2). 57–97Google Scholar
. 2019. An interface based account for the grammaticalization of the VO word order in the history of English. Venice: Ca’ Foscari University of Venice PhD dissertation.
. 2020. Verb and object order in the history of English: A language-internal account. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
De Bastiani, Chiara & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2020. On the syntax of object pronouns in Old English and Early Middle English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion & Ans van Kemenade. 2014. Verb particles and OV/VO in the history of English. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 140–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. & Jan Terje Faarlund. 2014. English: The language of the Vikings. (Olomouc Modern Language Monographs 3). Olomouc: Palacký University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Tony & Wim van der Wurff. 1995. The survival of object-verb order in Middle English: Some data, Neophilologus 79(2). 309–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuß, Eric & Carola Trips. 2002. On the validity of the Double Base Hypothesis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4. 171–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 2015. Nominal syntax at the interfaces: A comparative study of languages with articles. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric. 2008. Review of Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lingua 118. 1998–2007.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2014. On the interaction between syntax, prosody and information structure: An interface approach to word order developments in Germanic. In Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages, 341–376. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. An interface account of word-order variation in Old High German. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time, 299–318. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. From OV to VO in English: How to Kroch the nut. In Bettelou Los & Pieter de Haan (eds.), Word order change in acquisition and language contact: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade, 9–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland, Svetlana Petrova & Michael Solf. 2005. Diskurspragmatische Faktoren für die Topikalität und Verbstellung in der althochdeutschen Tatianübersetzung. In Ishihara, Shinichiro, Michaela Schmitz & Anne Schwarz (eds.), Approaches and findings in oral, written and gestural language (Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 3), 143–182. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova. 2010. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120. 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Prosodic and information structural factors. In Agnes Jäger, Gisella Ferraresi & Helmut Weiß (eds.), Clause structure and word order in the history of German, 277–288. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2000. Word order change in Icelandic: From OV to VO. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Discourse relations and word order change. In Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds.), Information structure and language change, 91–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Bettelou Los. 2006. Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 224–278. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Marit Westergaard. 2012. Syntax and information structure: Verb second variation in Middle English. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 87–118. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure, Volume 6, 13–55. Potsdam: Potsdam Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. Verb-object order in Middle English. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 132–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linde, Sonja. 2009. Aspects of word order and information structure in Old Saxon. In Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds.), Information structure and language change, 367–389. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Ans van Kemenade. 2018. Syntax and the morphology of deixis: The loss of demonstratives and paratactic clause linking. In Marco Coniglio, Andrew Murphy, Eva Schlachter & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Atypical demonstratives, 127–157. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milićev, Tanya. 2016. Syntax and information structure of the Old English VP. Novi Sad: University of Novi Sad PhD dissertation.
Moerenhout, Mike & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. Remnants of the old order: OV in the Paston Letters. English Studies 81(6). 513–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Object–verb order in early sixteenth-century English prose: An exploratory study. English Language and Linguistics 9(1). 83–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana. 2009. Information structure and word order variation in the Old High German Tatian. In Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds.), Information structure and language change, 251–279. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana & Augustin Speyer. 2011. Focus movement and focus interpretation in Old English. In Edgar Onea & Malte Zimmermann (eds.), Focus marking strategies and focus interpretation, Lingua Special Issue 121 (11). 1751–1765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Ann Taylor. 2006. The loss of OV Order in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The Handbook of the history of English, 249–278. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1997. Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 397–426. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sisam, Celia. 1951. The scribal tradition of the Lambeth Homilies. The Review of English Studies 2(6). 105–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struik, Tara & Ans van Kemenade. 2018. On the givenness of OV word order: A (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 24. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trips, Carola. 2002. From OV to VO in Early Middle English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk. 2011. The interaction of syntactic change and information status effects in the change from OV to VO in English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10. 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012a. Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2. 29–52.Google Scholar
. 2012b. The effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 47–65. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological, and information-structural interactions, 318–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C. 2009. Antisymmetry and the conservation of C-Command: Scrambling and phrase structure in synchronic and diachronic perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation. (Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 77). [URL]