Chapter published in:
English Historical Linguistics: Change in structure and meaning. Papers from the XXth ICEHL
Edited by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone and Graeme Trousdale
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 358] 2022
► pp. 115136
References

Sources

D’Ardenne, Simonne T. R. O.
(ed.) 1961Þe liflade and te passiun of Seinte Juliene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1977The Katherine Group edited from ms. Bodley 34. Bibliothèque de la Faculté de philosophie et lettres de l’Université de Liège fasc. 215. Paris: Société d’Edition Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Hall, Joseph
(ed.) 1972Selections from Early Middle English 1130–1250, 2nd edn. (1st edn. 1920) Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Holthausen, Ferdinand
1888Vices and virtues. Part 1. EETS O.S. 89. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Huber, Emily R. & Elizabeth Robertson
(eds.) 2016The Katherine Group: MS Bodley 34. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Medieval Institute Publications (Robbins Library Digital Projects). http://​d​.lib​.rochester​.edu​/teams​/publication​/huber​-and​-robertson​-the​-katherine​-group
Komen, Erwin
2011CorpusStudio, Nijmegen: Radboud University. http://​erwinkomen​.ruhosting​.nl​/software​/CorpusStudio/
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor
2000The Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, 2nd edn. http://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora/
Mc Sparran, Frances, Paul Schaffner, John Latta, Alan Pagliere, Chris Powell & Matt Stoeffler
(eds.) 2001Middle English dictionary, University of Michigan Digital Library Production Service, https://​quod​.lib​.umich​.edu​/m​/med/
Morris, Richard
(ed.) 1969Old English homilies and homiletic treatises. Part I. EETS O.S. 29, 34. New York: Greenwood Press. Originally published by Trübner (London 1868).Google Scholar
(ed.) 1873Old English homilies of the twelfth century. Second series. EETS O.S. 53. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths
2003The York–Toronto–Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English prose. York, UK: Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York. Available through the Oxford Text Archive.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia
2016The definite determiner in Early Middle English: What happened with þe?. In Sten Vikner, Henrik Jørgensen & Elly van Gelderen (eds.), Let us have articles betwixt us – Papers in historical and comparative linguistics in honour of Johanna L. Wood, 43–82. Aarhus: Department of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin
2001Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. Bergen: University of Bergen PhD dissertation. https://​bora​.uib​.no​/handle​/1956​/3850 (26 February, 2021).
Behaghel, Otto
1932Deutsche Syntax, Band 4. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts
2005Changing EPP parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 9(1). 5–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty J.
2006Inferential relations and noncanonical word order. In Betty J. Birner & Gregory L. Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cloutier, Robert A.
2009West Germanic OV and VO: The status of exceptions. Utrecht: LOTGoogle Scholar
De Bastiani, Chiara
2017Prosody and information structure in Old English: Testing the framework. Linguistica Atlantica 36(2). 57–97Google Scholar
2019An interface based account for the grammaticalization of the VO word order in the history of English. Venice: Ca’ Foscari University of Venice PhD dissertation.
2020Verb and object order in the history of English: A language-internal account. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
De Bastiani, Chiara & Roland Hinterhölzl
2020On the syntax of object pronouns in Old English and Early Middle English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion & Ans van Kemenade
2014Verb particles and OV/VO in the history of English. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 140–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. & Jan Terje Faarlund
2014English: The language of the Vikings. (Olomouc Modern Language Monographs 3). Olomouc: Palacký University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff
2000The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Tony & Wim van der Wurff
1995The survival of object-verb order in Middle English: Some data, Neophilologus 79(2). 309–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuß, Eric & Carola Trips
2002On the validity of the Double Base Hypothesis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4. 171–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana
2015Nominal syntax at the interfaces: A comparative study of languages with articles. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric
2008Review of Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lingua 118. 1998–2007.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2014On the interaction between syntax, prosody and information structure: An interface approach to word order developments in Germanic. In Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages, 341–376. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015An interface account of word-order variation in Old High German. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time, 299–318. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017From OV to VO in English: How to Kroch the nut. In Bettelou Los & Pieter de Haan (eds.), Word order change in acquisition and language contact: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade, 9–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland, Svetlana Petrova & Michael Solf
2005Diskurspragmatische Faktoren für die Topikalität und Verbstellung in der althochdeutschen Tatianübersetzung. In Ishihara, Shinichiro, Michaela Schmitz & Anne Schwarz (eds.), Approaches and findings in oral, written and gestural language (Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 3), 143–182. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova
2010From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120. 315–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Prosodic and information structural factors. In Agnes Jäger, Gisella Ferraresi & Helmut Weiß (eds.), Clause structure and word order in the history of German, 277–288. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg
2000Word order change in Icelandic: From OV to VO. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans
1987Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Discourse relations and word order change. In Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds.), Information structure and language change, 91–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Bettelou Los
2006Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 224–278. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Marit Westergaard
2012Syntax and information structure: Verb second variation in Middle English. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 87–118. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2007Basic notions of information structure. In Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure, Volume 6, 13–55. Potsdam: Potsdam Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor
2000Verb-object order in Middle English. In Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 132–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linde, Sonja
2009Aspects of word order and information structure in Old Saxon. In Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds.), Information structure and language change, 367–389. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Ans van Kemenade
2018Syntax and the morphology of deixis: The loss of demonstratives and paratactic clause linking. In Marco Coniglio, Andrew Murphy, Eva Schlachter & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Atypical demonstratives, 127–157. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milićev, Tanya
2016Syntax and information structure of the Old English VP. Novi Sad: University of Novi Sad PhD dissertation.
Moerenhout, Mike & Wim van der Wurff
2000Remnants of the old order: OV in the Paston Letters. English Studies 81(6). 513–530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Object–verb order in early sixteenth-century English prose: An exploratory study. English Language and Linguistics 9(1). 83–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana
2009Information structure and word order variation in the Old High German Tatian. In Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds.), Information structure and language change, 251–279. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana & Augustin Speyer
2011Focus movement and focus interpretation in Old English. In Edgar Onea & Malte Zimmermann (eds.), Focus marking strategies and focus interpretation, Lingua Special Issue 121 (11). 1751–1765. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1999Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Ann Taylor
2006The loss of OV Order in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The Handbook of the history of English, 249–278. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1997Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 397–426. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sisam, Celia
1951The scribal tradition of the Lambeth Homilies. The Review of English Studies 2(6). 105–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Struik, Tara & Ans van Kemenade
2018On the givenness of OV word order: A (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 24. 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trips, Carola
2002From OV to VO in Early Middle English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
2011The interaction of syntactic change and information status effects in the change from OV to VO in English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10. 71–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012aVerb order, object position and information status in Old English. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2. 29–52.Google Scholar
2012bThe effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 47–65. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological, and information-structural interactions, 318–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C.
2009Antisymmetry and the conservation of C-Command: Scrambling and phrase structure in synchronic and diachronic perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation. (Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 77). https://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/edissertations​/77