Part of
English Historical Linguistics: Change in structure and meaning
Edited by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone and Graeme Trousdale
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 358] 2022
► pp. 225242
Anderson, John
1991Should. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax, 11–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bramley, H. R.
1874S. Gregorii Magni regulæ patoralis liber. S. Gregory on the pastoral charge: The Benedictine text, with an English Translation. Oxford: James Parker and Co.Google Scholar
BT: Bosworth, Joseph & T. Northcote Toller
1898An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1992Syntax. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Volume 2. 1066–1476, 207–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson & Henry Kucera
1979Brown Corpus manual: Manual of information to accompany a standard corpus of Present-Day edited American English for use with digital computers. [URL]
Goossens, Louis
1987The auxiliarization of the English modals: A functional grammar view. In Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries, 111–143. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorrell, Joseph Hendren
1895Indirect discourse in Anglo-Saxon. Baltimore: The Modern Language Association of America. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HC: The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts
1991Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
1998It is important that this study (should) be based on the analysis of parallel corpora: On the use of the mandative subjunctive in four major varieties of English. In Hans Lindquist, Staffan Klintborg, Magnus Levin & Maria Estling (eds.), The major varieties of English. Papers from Maven 97, Växjö 20–22 November 1997 (Acta Wexionensia Humaniora 1), 159–175. Växjö University.Google Scholar
Iyeiri, Yoko
2017Recent changes in the use of the verb ‘forbid’. Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters, Kyoto University 56. 195–218.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig, Geoffrey Leech & Helen Goodluck
1978Manual of information to accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for use with digital computers. Oslo: Department of English, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Belén Mendez Naya
1996On the use of the subjunctive and modals in Old and Middle English dependent commands and requests. Evidence from the Helsinki Corpus. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 97. 411–421.Google Scholar
2006Complement selection in Early English dependent desires: A look at commands and requests. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 14. 33–53.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2005The rise of the to-infinitive. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MED: Middle English Dictionary
Moessner, Lilo
1992Relative constructions and functional amalgamation in Early Modern English. In Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), History of Englishes. New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics, 336–351. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED. Oxford English Dictionary
Ogawa, Hiroshi
1989Old English modal verbs: A syntactical study. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1999Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume 3. 1066–1476, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1872King Alfred’s West-Saxon version of Gregory’s pastoral care (EETS 45/50). London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1972A history of English syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1992Syntax. In Richard M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Volume 1. The Beginnings to 1066, 168–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, F. Th
1963–1973An historical syntax of the English language. Three Volumes. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony
1993English auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar