Chapter in:
English Historical Linguistics: Change in structure and meaning. Papers from the XXth ICEHL
Edited by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone and Graeme Trousdale
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 358] 2022
► pp. 310344
References

References

Aarts, Bas & April McMahon
(eds.) 2006The handbook of English linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arbib, Michael A.
2012How the brain got language: The mirror system hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane L.
1988 So as a constraint on relevance. In Ruth M. Kempson (ed.), Mental representations: The interface between language and reality, 183–195. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina B.
2008 So what’s up? Using the discourse marker so to launch conversational business. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3). 302–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 41(5). 974–998. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boulonnais, Dominique
2006 So et les phenomènes d’expansion contextuelle. In Geneviève Girard-Gillet (ed.), Aux marges du texte: Texte et co-texte. Etudes réunies par Geneviève Girard (C.I.E.R.E.C. Travaux 128), 49–69. Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Etienne.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl
1904Die Demonstrativpronomina der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Ingrid van Alphen
(eds.) 2012Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
CMEPV = The Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse
The Humanities Text Initiative, University of Michigan. https://​quod​.lib​.umich​.edu​/c​/cme/
Collins Cobuild Advanced Dictionary
2009 Boston: Heinle.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
2017Discourse-pragmatic variation in context: Eight hundred years of LIKE. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999Demonstratives: Form, functions and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4). 463–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Where does language come from? Some reflections on the role of deictic gesture and demonstratives in the evolution of language. Cognitive Linguistics 5(2–3). 239–249.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
2003Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27(1). 61–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DOE = Cameron, Angus, Ashley Crandell Amos & Antonette diPaolo Healey
2007The Dictionary of Old English: A to G online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project.Google Scholar
DOEC = Healey, Antonette diPaolo, John Price Wilkin & Xin Xiang
2009The Dictionary of Old English Corpus on the World Wide Web. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project.Google Scholar
Ericson, Eston Everett
1932The use of ‘swa’ in Old English. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Fettig, Adolf
1935Die Gradadverbien im Mittelenglischen (Anglistische Forschungen 79). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Greet, William C.
(ed.) 1927The Reule of Crysten Religioun (Early English Text Society 5). London: A. Moring.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Oda Buchholz
1998Equative and simulative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & the Leipzig Equative Constructions Team
2017Equative constructions in world-wide perspective. In Yvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 9–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
HC = Helsinki Corpus TEI XML Edition
2011 1st edn. Designed by Alpo Honkapohja, Samuli Kaislaniemi, Henri Kauhanen, Matti Kilpiö, Ville Marttila, Terttu Nevalainen, Arja Nurmi, Matti Rissanen & Jukka Tyrkkö. Implemented by Henri Kauhanen & Ville Marttila. Based on The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts (1991) Helsinki: The Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG), University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2007The genesis of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kyung-An Song
2011On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47(3). 587–630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Samuel
1799/1913A dictionary of the English Language. A digital edition of the 1799 classic. https://​johnsonsdictionaryonline​.com​/so/
Johnson, Alison
2002So…? Pragmatic implications of so-prefaced questions in formal police interviews. In Janet Cotterill (ed.), Language in the legal process, 91–110. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1988Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Cross-linguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 145–166. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1991The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012Le rôle des déictiques de la manière dans le cadre d’une typologie de la deixis. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 107(1). 11–42.Google Scholar
2015Manner deixis as a source of grammatical markers in Indo-European languages. In Carlotta Viti (ed.), Perspectives on historical syntax, 33–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The deictic identification of similarity. In Yvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 143–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Yoko Nishina
2015Deixis der Art und Weise, der Qualität und des Grades im Deutschen und Japanischen: Eine kontrastiv vergleichende Analyse. Linguistische Berichte, Sonderhefte 20. 7–32.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Carla Umbach
2018Demonstratives of manner, of quality and of degree. In Marco Coniglio, Andrew Murphy, Eva Schlachter & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Atypical demonstratives: Syntax, semantics and typology, 285–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2017Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
McSparran, Frances, Paul Schaffner, John Latta, Alan Pagliere, Christina Powell & Matt Stoeffler
2000–2018Online edition in Middle English Compendium. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library. http://​quod​.lib​.umich​.edu​/m​/middle​-english​-dictionary/
MED = Hans Kurath, Sherman Kuhn & Robert E. Lewis
1952–2001Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
MEG-C = Stenroos, Merja Riitta, Martti Mäkinen, Simon Horobin & Jeremy Smith
2011The Middle English Grammar Corpus, version 2011.1. University of Stavanger. http://​www​.uis​.no​/research​/culture​/the​_middle​_english​_grammar​_project/
Mitchell, Bruce
1985Old English syntax I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F.
1960A Middle English syntax. Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.Google Scholar
Nummenmaa, Lusa
1973The uses of so, al so and as in Early Middle English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.Google Scholar
Oizumi, Akio
(ed.) 1991–2012A complete concordance to the works of Geoffrey Chaucer, volumes 1–16. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
Peltola, Niilo
1959On the ‘identifying’ swa (swa) phrase in Old English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 60. 156–173.Google Scholar
PPCME2 = Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor
2000The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. https://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora​/PPCME2​-RELEASE​-4​/index​.html
Raymond, Geoffrey
2004Prompting action: The stand-alone “so” in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(2). 185–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schleburg, Florian
2002Altenglisch ‚swa‘. Syntax und Semantik einer polyfunktionalen Partikel. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik
2005The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Chris L. Roberts
2005So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends . American Speech 80(3). 280–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Umbach, Carla & Helmar Gust
2014Similarity demonstratives. Lingua 149. 74–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Evie Coussé
2016 Such and sådan – the same but different. Nordic Journal of English Studies 15. 15–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Kalyanamalini Sahoo
2016On comparative concepts and descriptive categories such as they are. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 47. 136–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 Such similatives: A cross-linguistic reconnaissance. Language Sciences 81. 101217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webster’s New World College Dictionary
2014 Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
YCOE = Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths
2003The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE). Department of Linguistics, University of York. http://​www​-users​.york​.ac​.uk​/~lang22​/YcoeHome1​.htm
York Poetry Corpus = Pintzuk, Susan & Leendert Plug
2002The York-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Poetry. Department of Linguistics, University of York. http://​www​-users​.york​.ac​.uk​/~lang18​/pcorpus​.html