Cover not available
Part of
Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics: Papers selected from the 48th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 48), Toronto, 25-28 April 2018
Edited by Gabriela Alboiu and Ruth King
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 360] 2022
► pp. 127–142

Chapter 7
On (un)grammatical sequences of ses in Spanish

| University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
| University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
We discuss the ungrammaticality of Spanish impersonal se (Impse) in combination with another se in control structures. Our main goal is to critically evaluate Martins & Nunes’s (2017) account of parallel phenomena in European Portuguese, who, adopting a movement theory of control, claim that Impse merges in the external argument of the non-finite embedded verb and moves to the matrix clause. When Impse and the other se are transferred within the same phase, the result is ungrammaticality due to an identity violation. We illustrate that their approach cannot be extended to Spanish. Instead, we put forth MacDonald & Vázquez-Lozares’s (2021) proposal as an alternative, which as we show allows for an extension to ungrammatical contexts in which the identity of se cannot be appealed to.
Keywords: impersonal se, paradigmatic se, clitic climbing, clitic combinations, identity violation, control structures, Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Martins & Nunes (2017)
    • 2.1Matrix-embedded asymmetries
      • 2.1.1Impse + Spurse matrix-embedded asymmetry
      • 2.1.2Impse + lo matrix-embedded asymmetry
  • 3.Clitic climbing
  • 4.An alternative proposal and an extension
  • 5.A brief recap
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.360.07mac
References (27)
References
Bonet, Eulalia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Bruhn de Garavito, Joyce, David Heap & Jacques Lamarche. 2002. French and Spanish se: underspecified, not reflexive. Actes du Congrès de l’Association canadienne de linguistique 2002. 42–54Google Scholar
Calandria, Cecilia, Esteban Palací & Andrés Saab. 1999. El problema de la organización argumental y la concordancia. Paper presented at Congreso Internacional la Gramática: Modelos, Enseñanza, Historia, organizado por el Instituto de Lingüística, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina, August 4–7.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. On si constructions and the theory of arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4). 521–581.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María C. 2013. Spanish clitic clusters: Three of a perfect pair. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2(2). 191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1998. Impersonal se Constructions in Romance and the Passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29(3). 399–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harizanov, Boris. 2014. Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface: A-movement and morphological merger in Bulgarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32(4). 1033–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luján, Marta. 1980. Clitic promotion and mood in Spanish verbal complements. Linguistics 18. 381–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan E. 2017. An implicit projected argument in Spanish impersonal and passive-se constructions. Syntax 20(4).353–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan E. & Matthew Maddox. 2018. Passive se in Romanian and Spanish: A subject cycle. Journal of Linguistics 54(2). 389–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan E. & Jeriel Melgares. 2021. On (un)grammatical clitic sequences in impersonal se constructions. In Grant Armstrong & Jonathan E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexity of SE, 87–110. Dodrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDondald, Jonathan & Almike Vázquez-Lozares. 2021. Spanish impersonal se in control infinitivals and the ungrammaticality of se se sequences. In Tim Gupton & Elizabeth Gielau (eds.), East and west of the Pentacrest: Linguistic studies in honor of Paula Kempchinsky. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martins, Ana María. 2000. A minimalist approach to clitic climbing. In João Costa (ed.), Portuguese syntax: New comparative studies, 169–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martins, Ana María & Jairo Nunes. 2017. Identity avoidance with reflexive clitics in European Portuguese and the theory of control. Linguistic Inquiry 48(4). 627–649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1). 69–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. Construcciones con se: Medias, Pasivas e Impersonales. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, 1631–1722. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
. 2008. Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance: Syntactic features and semantic interpretation. Transactions of the Philological Society 106(2). 290–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya & Adrian Battye. 1990. Arb SE/SI in transitive contexts: A comparative study. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 15. 161–195.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for Person-Case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 273–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco. 2012. Clitics in Spanish. In José Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rourke (eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics, 423–451. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. On the nature of the impersonal SE: Why Italian is not like Catalan and Spanish. In Grant Armstrong & Jonathan E. MacDonald (eds.), Unraveling the complexity of SE, 137–160. Dodrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Esthela Treviño. 2016. Agreement and dom with impersonal se: A comparative study of Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. In Mary Kato & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), The morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana & María Luisa Zubizarreta. 2017. The Person Case Constraint: The syntactic encoding of perspective. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(1). 1291–1337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Rinehart and Winston Inc.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego. 2011. Mapping Romance clitic sequences. Quaderni di lavoro ASIt 12. 1–29.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1991. Excorporation and minimality. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 209–218.Google Scholar
Walkow, Martin. 2012. Goals, big and small. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.