References (24)
References
Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn, Elizabeth Cowper, Daniel Currie Hall & Andrew Peters. 2019. Person and deixis in Heiltsuk pronouns. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 64(4). 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowden, John. 2001. Taba: Description of a South Halmahera language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, John & Carmen Benjamin. 2000. A new reference grammar of modern Spanish (3rd edn.). Chicago, IL: NTC Publishing.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency. A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton-De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. In Colin J. Ewen & John M. Anderson (eds.), Phonology Yearbook 2. 25–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall. 2019. Scope variation in contrastive hierarchies of morphosyntactic features. In David W. Lightfoot & Jonathan Havenhill (eds.), Variable properties in language: Their nature and acquisition, 27–41. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 409–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan. 2009. The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 2006. Parallels in clausal and nominal periphery. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 151–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: PF: Papers at the Interface, 425–449. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harbour, Daniel. 2011. Descriptive and explanatory markedness. Morphology 21. 223–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number. Language 90. 185–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Impossible persons. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2008. When is a syncretism more than a syncretism? Impoverishment, metasyncretism, and underspecification. In David Adger, Susana Béjar & Daniel Harbour (eds.), Phi Theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, 251–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology. Glot International 4. 3–9.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature geometric analysis. Language 78. 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipski, John M. 2007. El español de America [American Spanish]. Madrid: Catedra.Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 445–479.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max, Nicolau Dols, & Alan Yates. 1999. Catalan: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar