Chapter 3
Why-stripping in Persian
I provide an account of why-stripping in Persian, in which there is a wh-phrase remnant cherā why and a non-wh-phrase remnant. This structure looks similar to sluicing with why, in which there is only a wh-phrase remnant cherā why. I argue that even though both structures involve clausal ellipsis, they have different characteristics and the mechanism of deriving them is different. I propose that unlike why in sluicing, which arrives at its surface position via focus fronting (Toosarvandani 2008), why in why-stripping functions as “how come” and is base-generated in the Spec of Int(errogative)P (Rizzi 2001) in the left periphery. In addition, I propose that the non-wh-phrase remnant, which carries a contrastive focus interpretation, moves to the Spec of FocP, before the rest of the clause is elided.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Characteristics of why-stripping
- 3.Evidence for ellipsis
- 3.1Case-matching effect
- 3.2Preposition-stranding
- 3.3Binding connectivity effect
- 3.4Voice mismatch
- 3.5Summary
- 4.Evidence for the base-generation of why in why-stripping
- 5.Analysis
- 6.Cross-linguistic implications and predictions
- 7.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
Abbreviations
-
References