Part of
Advances in Iranian Linguistics IIEdited by Simin Karimi, Narges Nematollahi, Roya Kabiri and Jian Gang Ngui
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 361] 2023
► pp. 180–209
Edited by Simin Karimi, Narges Nematollahi, Roya Kabiri and Jian Gang Ngui
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 361] 2023
► pp. 180–209
Chapter 7Mood selection in complement clauses in Persian
Similar to Romance and Balkan languages, Persian makes a formal distinction between indicative and subjunctive moods in its complement clauses. This paper proposes several generalizations about the distribution of the two moods, and evaluates the current theories of mood selection against Persian data. The proposal is that indicative appears when the complement is propositional, i.e., of type <st>, and when one of the two other conditions holds: (1) the matrix predicate entails the content of the complement clause is in attitude holder’s context set, in which case the indicative mood makes no special semantic contribution, OR (2) the content of the complement clause or its negation is in speaker’s context set, in which case indicative signals the epistemic commitment of the speaker. Subjunctive, on the other hand, is selected when the conditions for the indicative are not met. As such, I argue that mood selection in complement clauses in Persian makes references to (1) the semantic type of the complement, (2) the semantics of the matrix predicate in terms of (non)veridicality, and (3) the speaker’s stand about the complement.
Keywords: mood selection, complement clauses, subjunctive, Persian
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous studies on Persian mood selection
- 3.Propositional vs. non-propositional predicates
- 3.1Belief reports vs. directive, causative and implicative predicates
- 3.2Desire predicates
- 4.Generalization
- 4.1Mood selection in Group 1
- 4.1.1Factive, assertive and perceptive predicates
- 4.1.2Doxastic predicates
- 4.1.3Desire predicates
- 4.2Mood selection in Group 2
- 4.3A general description of mood selection in complement clauses in Persian
- 4.1Mood selection in Group 1
- 5.Mood selection in Persian in view of the general study of mood selection
- 6.Modifications of Schlenker’s theory for the Persian data
- 6.1Indicative mood
- 6.2Subjunctive mood
- 7.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements -
Notes -
Abbreviations -
References
References
Anand, Pranav & Valentine Hacquard
2013 Epistemics and attitudes. Semantics & Pragmatics 6. 1–59. 
Baglini, Rebekah & Itamar Francez
2016 The implications of managing. Journal of Semantics 33(3). 541–560.
Bolinger, Dwight
1968 Post-posed main phrases: An English rule for the Romance subjunctive. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 14. 3–30.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri
1975 Thinking and doing. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Clements, Clancy Joseph
1992 Semantics of control, tense sequence, and disjoint reference. In Paul Hirschbühler & Ernst Frideryk Konrad Koerner (eds.), Romance languages and modern linguistic theory: Selected papers from the XX linguistic symposium on Romance languages, University of Ottawa, April 10–14, 1990, 45–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Condoravdi, Cleo & Sven Lauer
2016 Anankastic conditionals are just conditionals. Semantics & Pragmatics 9. 1–61.
Darzi, Ali & Saera Kwak
2015 Syntax and semantics of subjunctive clauses in Persian. Lingua 153. 1–13.
Davidson, Donald
1967 The Logical form of action sentences. In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The logic of decision and action, 81–95. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Dowty, David Roach
1979 Word meaning and Montague grammar: the semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Farkas, Donka
2003 Assertion, belief, and mood choice. Ms., University of Santa Cruz.
von Fintel, Kai
1999 NPI-licensing, Strawson-entailment, and context-dependency. Journal of Semantics 16. 97–148.
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2011 Nonveridicality and mood choice: subjunctive, polarity, and time. In Renate Musan and Monika Rathert (eds.), Tense across Languages. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi
1997 Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hare, Richard Mervyn
1968 Wanting: Some pitfalls. In Robert Binkley, Richard Bronaugh & Ausonio Marras (eds.), Agent, action and reason, 44–58. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Heim, Irene
1992 Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9. 183–221.
Hoff, Mark
2018 Settledness and tense/mood variation in Romance: Refining taxonomies of projective contents. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America (LSA) 29, Salt Lake City, January 4–8.
Ilkhanipour, Negin
2018 On subjunctive clauses and irrealis mood in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 63(1). 100–111.
Klein, Wolfgang
1994 Time in Language. London: Routledge.
Kratzer, Angelika
1998 More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Devon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VIII, 92–110. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Levinson, Dmitry
2003 Probabilistic model-theoretic semantics for want. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 13, 222–239.
Parsons, Terence
1990 Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Partee, Barbara Hall
1973 Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy 70. 601–609.
Pesetsky, David
1992 Zero Syntax II. Ms., Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Portner, Paul
2018 Mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schlenker, Philippe
2005 The lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive: Speculations on reference to worlds and semantic defaults in the analysis of mood. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken, & Haike Jacobs (eds.) Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003, 269–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Siegel, Laura
2009 Mood selection in Romance and Balkan. Lingua 119. 1859–1882.
Villalta, Elisabeth
2008 Mood and gradability: An investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish. Linguistics and Philosophy 31. 467–522.