Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Iranian Linguistics II
Edited by Simin Karimi, Narges Nematollahi, Roya Kabiri and Jian Gang Ngui
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 361] 2023
► pp. 231–262

Chapter 9
A null stem analysis of Persian copular verbs

| Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
| Tokyo University of Foreign Studies

Traditional grammars of Persian recognize two copular series for the affirmative indicative present tense, which we call the independent copulas and dependent copulas. The former has been considered as a full verb whereas the latter has been described as an enclitic. This paper explores the syntactic and phonological properties of the two copular series by looking into cases in which only one form is grammatical. We propose that the dependent copulas are not enclitics but have the same internal structure as the independent copulas, consisting of a null verbal stem and a person inflectional suffix. Through examinations of the syntactic operations of A-bar movement via association with an enclitic focus particle and ellipsis of the complement, as well as stress assignment in copular constructions, we demonstrate that nonparallel grammatical judgments arise from unsuccessful stress assignment, which results from the absence of overt material in the complement. This work contributes a new look at the copular system in Persian and beyond, which has not been extensively investigated in the literature.

Keywords: copula, zero copula, syntax-phonology interface, focus particle, Persian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contrast between the two copular forms
    • 2.1Copular constructions
    • 2.2Focus
    • 2.3Ellipsis
    • 2.4Stress Assignment
  • 3.Copular paradigm
    • 3.1Descriptions of copular verbs
    • 3.2Dependent copula = null stem + person suffix
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Syntactic structure
    • 4.2Syntax-phonology interface
  • 5.Additional supporting evidence
    • 5.1Agreement morphemes for the third person singular
    • 5.2Historical perspective
    • 5.3Cross-linguistic perspective
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 14 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.361.09oku
References
Arche, María J., Antonio Fábregas & Rafael Marín
2019 Main questions in the study of copulas. In María J. Arche, Antonio Fábregas & Rafael Marín (eds.), The grammar of copulas across languages, 1–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Béjar, Susana & Arsalan Kahnemuyipour
2017 Non-canonical agreement in copular clauses. Journal of Linguistics 53(3). 463–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowers, John
1993 The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 591–656. [URL]
Ghomeshi, Jila
1997 Topics in Persian VPs. Lingua 102(2–3). 133–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 The syntax of pragmaticalization. In Shan Luo (ed.), Proceedings of the 2013 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, [URL]
2020 The additive particle in Persian. In Richard Larson, Sedigheh Moradi & Vida Samiian (eds.), Advances in Iranian Linguistics, 57–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi
1995 Subjects, events, and licensing: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation. DOI logo
Hosseini, Ayat
2014 The phonology and phonetics of prosodic prominence in Persian: University of Tokyo dissertation. DOI logo
Jahani, Carina & Agnes Korn
2009 Balochi. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, chap. 11, 634–692. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A.
2001 IP-internal topic and focus phrases. Studia Linguistica 55(1). 39–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Josephson, Judith
2003 Nominal sentences and copula in Middle and Early New Persian. In Persian origins: Early Judaeo-Persian and the emergence of New Persian: Collected papers of the symposium, Göttingen 1999, vol. 6, 79–94. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
2003 Syntactic categories and Persian stress. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21(2). 333–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The syntax of sentential stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamali, Beste & Lena Karvovskaya
2013 ‘Also’ in Turkish and Ishkashimi. In Proceedings of Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics 8, 181–186.Google Scholar
Karimi, Simin
1990 Obliqueness, specificity, and discourse functions. Linguistic Analysis 20(3–4). 139–191.Google Scholar
2005 A minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É.
1998 Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2). 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korn, Agnes
2011 Pronouns as verbs, verbs as pronouns: Demonstratives and the copula in Iraninan. In Agnes Korn, Geoffrey Haig, Simin Karimi & Pollet Samvelian (eds.), Topics in Iranian linguistics, vol. 34 Beiträge zur Iranistik, 53–70. Wiesbaden: Reichert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambton, Ann K. S.
1971 Persian grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1963 La langue des plus anciens monuments de la prose persane. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1992 A grammar of contemporary Persian. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers. Translated by Shirley A. Lyon.Google Scholar
Mahmoodi-Bakhtiari, Behrooz
2019 Morphology. In Anousha Sedighi & Pouneh Shabani-Jadidi (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Persian linguistics, chap. 10, 273–299. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahootian, Shahrzad
1997 Persian. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahootian, Shahrzad & Lewis Gebhardt
2018 Revisiting the status of -eš in Persian. In Alireza Korangy & Corey Miller (eds.), Trends in Iranian and Persian linguistics, 263–276. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarus, Ernest N.
2009 Kurdish. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, chap. 10, 587–633. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, Line
2005 Copular clauses: Specification, predication and equation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishiyama, Kunio
1999 Adjectives and the copulas in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8(3). 183–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okubo, Wataru
2020 Contrastive Topic and directionality: A comparative analysis of CT markers in Persian. In Ömer Eren, Asimina Giannoula, Sam Gray, Chi-Dat Lam (Daniel) & Aurora Martinez Del Rio (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Öpengin, Ergin
2016 The Mukri variety of Central Kurdish: Grammar, texts, and lexicon, vol. 40 Beiträge zur Iranistik. Wiesbaden: Reichert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oroji, Mohammad Reza & Amir Rezaei
2013 Exploring ‘ke’ as a focus particle in Persian from both form and function points of view. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33(1). 76–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Ludwig
2013 Persian language i. Early New Persian. Encyclopædia Iranica. Online edition. Available at [URL] (accessed 4 October 2020).
Rasekh-Mahand, Mohammad
2014 Persian clitics: Doubling and agreement. Journal of Modern Languages 24(1). 16–33.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadat-Tehrani, Nima
2007 The intonational grammar of Persian: University of Manitoba dissertation.
2017 Expressing concession by means of Nuclear Pitch Accent. California Linguistic Notes 41(1). 1–25.Google Scholar
Samvelian, Pollet & Jesse Tseng
2010 Persian object clitics and the syntax-morphology interface. In Stefan Muller (ed.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 212–232. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods Oktor
2009 Middle West Iranian. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, chap. 4, 196–278. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stassen, Leon
2003 Intransitive predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013 Zero copula for predicate nominals. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Stilo, Donald
2004 Coordination in three Western Iranian languages: Vafsi, Persian and Gilaki. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 269–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thackston, Wheeler M.
1993 An introduction to Persian. Bethesda, MD: Ibex Publishers.Google Scholar
Windfuhr, Gernot
1979 Persian grammar: History and state of its study. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Windfuhr, Gernot & John R. Perry
2009 Persian and Tajik. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, chap. 8, 416–544. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshie, Satoko
2011 Perusyago bumpo handobukku [Persian grammar handbook]. Tokyo: Hakusuisya.Google Scholar
Yousef, Saeed
2018 Persian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum
1983 Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language 59(3). 502–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar