Part of
Advances in Iranian Linguistics II
Edited by Simin Karimi, Narges Nematollahi, Roya Kabiri and Jian Gang Ngui
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 361] 2023
► pp. 282306
References (21)
References
Béjar, Susana & Milan Rezac. 2009. Cyclic Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1). 35–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen, & Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Darzi, Ali. 1996. Word order, NP movements, and opacity conditions in Persian. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois dissertation.
Faghiri, Pegah, & Pollet Samvelian. 2016. How much structure is needed: The case of the Persian VP. In Arnold, Doug, Miriam Butt, Berthold Crysmann, Tracy Holloway King & Stefan Müller (eds.), Joint Conference on head-driven phrase structure grammar and lexical functional grammar. Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences, 236–254. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila. 2001. Control and thematic agreement. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46(1–2). 9–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, Jeffrey Lidz & Julien Musolino. 2007. Verb-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry 38(1). 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 2005. Airport’86 revisited: Toward a unified indefinite any. In Gregory Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The Partee Effect, 179–205. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2017. Negation is low in Persian: evidence from nominalization. Paper presented to the Canadian Linguistic Association (CLA). [URL] (3 October, 2022)
. 2019. The CP-vP parallelism: Evidence from (some) Iranian languages. Paper presented to the Second North American Conference on Iranian Linguistics (NACIL 2).Google Scholar
Karimi, Simin. 2005. A minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Generative approaches to syntax. In Sedighi, Anousha & Pouneh Shabani-Jadidi (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Persian Linguistics, 161–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Shin-Sook. 2002. Intervention effects are focus effects. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10. 615–628.Google Scholar
Kuno, Masakazu. 2008. Negation, focus, and negative concord in Japanese. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 28. 195–211.Google Scholar
Kwak, Saera. 2010. Negation in Persian. Iranian Studies 43(5). 621–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichte, Timm & Laura Kallmeyer. 2006. Licensing German negative polarity items in LTAG. The International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms 8. 81–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özgen, Murat & Özgür Aydın. 2016. What type of defective feature do exceptionally case-marked clauses of Turkish bear? Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 6. 302–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter, & Shin-Sook Kim. 2006. Korean NPIs scope over negation. Language Research 42. 275–297.Google Scholar
Shafiei, Nazila. Manuscript. Persian quantifiers and their scope. Ms. Stony Brook University. [URL] (22 October, 2020)
Shafiei, Nazila & Dennis Ryan Storoshenko. 2017. Scope as a diagnostic for the position of negation in Persian. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 23.1: Annual Penn Linguistics Conference 40. 241–250.Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko. 2011. Japanese indeterminate negative polarity items and their scope. Journal of Semantics 28. 413–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taleghani, Azita Hojatollah. 2006. The interaction of modality, aspect and negation in Persian. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona dissertation.