The rise and fall of sentence-internal capitalization in English
A corpus-based approach
This paper addresses an empirically under-researched aspect of English historical orthography: the rise and fall of sentence-internal capitalization of common nouns. Our corpus study supports previous findings with respect to the developmental course of common noun capitalization, i.e., a steady rise until 1750 with a steep decline thereafter. The analysis of contemporary grammars shows that animacy was a key factor in determining the practice of sentence-internal capitalization. Moreover, the grammaticographic advice parallels the development found in actual usage, suggesting that grammarians did not significantly influence its rise or fall. With respect to its decline, we argue that it was mainly a matter of the printers, who introduced lowercase for practical reasons, once sentence-internal capitalization had been extensively used.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The evolution of sentence-internal capitalization
- 3.Sentence-internal capitalization: The case of English
- 3.1Corpus study
- 3.2Spelling books and grammars
- 4.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (43)
References
Alston, R. C. 1965–77. A bibliography of the English language from the invention of printing to the year 1800: A systematic record of writings on English, and on other languages in English, based on the collections of the principal libraries of the world. Arnold.
Anderwald, L. 2016. Language between description and prescription. Verbs and verb categories in nineteenth-century grammars of English. Oxford University Press. 

Arppe, A., G. Gilquin, D. Glynn, M. Hilpert & A. Zeschel. 2010. Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5(1). 1–27. 

Baron, A. & P. Rayson. 2008. VARD 2: A tool for dealing with spelling variation in historical corpora. Proceedings of the postgraduate conference in corpus linguistics. [URL]
Barteld, F., S. Hartmann & R. Szczepaniak. 2016. The usage and spread of sentence-internal capitalization in Early New High German. Folia Lingustica 50(2). 385–412.
Bergmann, R. & N. Nerius. 1998. Die Entwicklung der Großschreibung im Deutschen von 1500 bis 1710. Winter Verlag.
Bunčić, D. 2012. The standardization of Polish orthography in the 16th century. In S. Baddeley & A. Voeste (eds.), Orthographies in Early Modern Europe, 219–254. Mouton De Gruyter.
Crystal, D. 2003. The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
De Smet, H., H.-J. Diller & J. Tyrkkö. 2011. The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts (CLMET), version 3.0. [URL]
De Smet, H. 2005. A corpus of Late Modern English texts. ICAME Journal 29. 69–82.
Dekeyser, X. 1975. Number and case relations in 19th-century British English. De Nederlandsche Boekhandel.
Dücker, L. 2020. Großschreibung von Personenbezeichnungen in Hexenverhörprotokollen – eine Analyse von Gender, Lemma und Rolle im Gerichtsprozess. In A. Schütz, R. Szczepaniak & M. Hess (eds.), Forschende Frauen 2020. Beiträge Bamberger Nachwuchswissenschaftlerinnen, 31–50. Bamberg University Press.
ECEG = Eighteenth-Century English Grammars database, 2010. Compiled by María E. Rodríguez-Gil (University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain) and Nuria Yáñez-Bouza (The University of Manchester, UK). [URL]
EEBO = Text Creation Partnership (TCP). 2000–2019. Early English Books Online. [URL]
Foxon, D. 1991. Pope and the early eighteenth-century book trade. Clarendon Press.
Gilles, P. 2015. From status to corpus: Codification and implementation of spelling norms in Luxembourgish. In W. V. Davies & E. Ziegler (eds.), Language planning and microlinguistics. From policy to interaction and vice versa, 128–149. Palgrave Macmillan. 

Görlach, M. 1991. Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge University Press. 

Görlach, M. 2001. Eighteenth-century English. Winter Verlag.
Grüter, M. 2009. Optimalitätstheoretische Modellierung von Groß- und Kleinschreibung: eine Beispielanalyse englischer Texte um 1730. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 28(2). 203–230. 

Hamburger, A. 1981. Die gemäßigte Kleinschreibung im Dänischen. Die Reform von 1948 und ihre Auswirkungen. Kopenhagener Beiträge zur germanistischen Linguistik 17, 52–58.
Hopper, P. J. & E. Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press. 

Husson, A. 1977. La ponctuation: Recherches historiques et actuelles. Centre national de recherche scientifique.
Lundeby, E. & I. Torvik. 1956. Språket vårt gjennom tidene. Kort Norsk språkhistorie. Gyldendal.
Maas, U. 1995. Einige Grundannahmen zur Analyse der Groß- und Kleinschreibung im Deutschen, insbesondere zu ihrer Grammatikalisierung in der Frühen Neuzeit. In G. Lerchner, M. Schröder & U. Fix. (eds.), Chronologische, areale und situative Varietäten des Deutschen in der Sprachhistoriographie: Festschrift für Rudolf Große, 85–100. Peter Lang.
Maas, U. 2007. Die Grammatikalisierung der satzinternen Großschreibung. Zur schriftkulturellen Dimension der Orthographieentwicklung. In A. Redder (ed.), Diskurse und Texte, 385–399. Stauffenburg.
Meisenburg, T. 1990. Die großen Buchstaben und was sie bewirken können: Zur Geschichte der Majuskel im Französischen und im Deutschen. In W. Raible (ed.), Erscheinungsformen kultureller Prozesse, 281–315. Narr.
Nowak, J. 2019. Zur Diachronie der satzinternen Großschreibung im Kontrast: Englisch–Niederländisch–Deutsch. In R. Szczepaniak, S. Hartmann & L. Dücker (eds.), Historische Korpuslinguistik, 96–118. De Gruyter.
Nowak, J. 2020. A diachronic comparative study of sentence-internal capitalisation in Dutch and German. In G. De Vogelaer, D. Koster & T. Leuschner (eds.), German and Dutch in contrast: Synchronic, diachronic and psycholinguistic perspectives, 179–212. De Gruyter. 

Nowak, J. 2021. Zur Diachronie der satzinternen Großschreibung im Niederländischen. Eine korpusbasierte Studie zum textsortenspezifischen Majuskelgebrauch. In Taal & Tongval 73(2). 209–243. 

Osselton, N. E. 1984. Informal spelling in Early Modern English, 1500–1800. In N. F. Blake & C. Jones (eds.), English historical linguistics: Studies in development, 123–137. CECTAL, University of Sheffield.
Osselton, N. E. 1985. Spelling-book rules and the capitalization of nouns in the 17th and 18th centuries. In M.-J. Arn & H. Wirtjes (eds.), Historical and editorial studies in medieval and Early Modern English, 49–61. Wolters-Noordhoff.
Partridge, A. C. 1964. Orthography in Shakespeare and Elizabethan drama. A study of colloquial Contractions, elision, prosody and punctuation. Edward Arnold.
Schnaar, F. 1907. Die englische Orthographie seit Shakespeare: Mit Berücksichtigung der Grossschreibung und Interpunktion. R. Friedrichs Buchdruckerei.
Sebba, M. 2007. Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge University Press. 

Sebba, M. 2012. Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity and power. In A. M. Jaffe, J. Androutsopoulos, M. Sebba & S. Johnson (eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity and power (Language and Social Processes 3), 1–19. De Gruyter Mouton. 

Szczepaniak, R. 2011. Gemeinsame Entwicklungspfade in Spracherwerb und Sprachwandel? Kognitive Grundlagen der onto- und historiogenetischen Entwicklung der satzinternen Großschreibung. In K.-M. Köpcke & A. Ziegler (eds.), Grammatik – lehren, lernen, verstehen. Zugänge zur Grammatik des Gegenwartsdeutschen, 341–359. De Gruyter. 

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 1998. Standardization of English spelling: The eighteenth-century printers’ contribution. In J. Fisiak & M. Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics, 457–470. De Gruyter. 

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 2008. Grammar, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England. De Gruyter. 

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 2009. Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh University Press. 

Voeste, A. 2013. Den Leser im Blick. Die Professionalisierung des Setzerhandwerks im 16. Jahrhundert und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Orthographie der Druckausgaben der »Melusine«. In U. Rautenberg et al. (eds.), Zeichensprachen des literarischen Buchs in der frühen Neuzeit: Die ‚Melusine‘ des Thüring von Ringoltingen, 141–162. De Gruyter.
Wyndham, G. 1898. The poems of Shakespeare. Edited with an introduction and notes by George Wyndham. Methuen.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Matsumoto, Mallory E.
2024.
Graphemic Variation in Morphosyntactic Context: The Syllable u in Classic Maya Hieroglyphic Writing.
Topics in Cognitive Science 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.