Cover not available
Part of
Recent Advances in Multiword Units in Machine Translation and Translation Technology
Edited by Johanna Monti, Gloria Corpas Pastor, Ruslan Mitkov and Carlos Manuel Hidalgo-Ternero
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 366] 2024
► pp. 156–172

Chapter 9
The middle construction and some machine translation issues

Exploring the process of compositional cospecification in quality-oriented middles

| Universidad de Córdoba
This paper aims at exploring the colloconstructional analysis of multiword units (MWU) in machine translation regarding the middle construction in terms of compositional cospecification (Yoshimura, 1998; Yoshimura & Taylor, 2004). For that purpose, I examine the Adverb + Verb collocation focusing on the predicates cut and drive, collocated with quality-oriented adjuncts (Heyvaert, 2003) and incorporating Inanimate Subject entities (Patients, Enablers and Instruments). The number of instances examined is 500+. The data analysed reveals that apart from the generalised Qt-Qc pattern in shift of semantic importance, other patterns (namely, Qc-Qc) can be found by virtue of the prototype effects of the construction (cf. Taylor, 1995), thus, providing a potential source of disambiguation in the computational treatment of MWU in machine translation.
Keywords: colloconstructional analysis of MWU, machine translation, middle construction, compositional cospecification, quality-oriented middles, Adverb + Verb collocation, inanimate entities, prototype effects
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Tools for analysis: Qualia structure and the process of compositional cospecification
  • 4.Prototype effects in the middle construction: Examining certain issues within the process of machine translation of MWU
  • 5.Data collection and results
    • 5.1The case of drive middle instances
    • 5.2The case of cut middle instances
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.366.09gut
References (29)
References
Brdar, M. & Brdar Szabò, R. (1993). Functional Grammar and prototype theory: A case study from English, German, Croatian and Hungarian. Working Papers in Functional Grammar, 51, 1–32.Google Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government binding approach. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, K., & Heyvaert. L. (2007). On the middle voice: An interpersonal analysis of the English middle. Linguistics, 45(1), 37–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagan, S. (1992). The syntax and semantics of middle constructions: A study with special reference to German. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C. (1985). Adverbs in agentless actives and passives. Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity at the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 21–31).Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
González Romero, L. (2002). Estudio de Gramática Constrastiva: Las construcciones medias en inglés y español contemporáneas. Universidad de Huelva Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Guerrero Medina, P. (2017). The English conative as a family of constructions: Towards a usage-based approach. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, A. Luzondo Oyón, & P. Pérez Sobrino (Eds.), Constructing families of constructions: Analytical perspectives and theoretical challenges (pp. 277–299). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyvaert, L. (2003). A cognitive-functional approach to nominalization in English. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T., & Roberts, I. (1993). Middle constructions in Dutch and English. In E. Reuland & W. Abraham (Eds.), Knowledge and language (vol. 2): Lexical and conceptual structure (pp. 183–120). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. A. (2010). Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keyser, S. J., & Roeper, T. (1984). On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(3), 381–416.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Longman Online Dictionary of Contemporary English, LDOCE (n. d.) Pearson [URL].
Marín Arrese, J. (2011). Spontaneous and facilitative events revisited. In P. Guerrero Medina (Ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English. Functional and cognitive perspectives (pp. 137–160). Equinox.Google Scholar
Palma Gutiérrez, M. (2019). Semantic prosody in middle construction predicates: Exploring adverb + verb collocation in middles. In G. Corpas Pastor & R. Mitkov (Eds.), Computational and corpus-based phraseology (pp. 345–359). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Prototype effects in the process of compositional cospecification in the middle construction. Revista de Estudios Interlingüísticos, 9, 157–172.Google Scholar
(2022). A family-resemblance analysis of the middle construction: A functional-cognitive approach [Doctoral dissertation, University of Córdoba]. UCO Press.
Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 4, 157–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17(4), 409–441.Google Scholar
(1995). The generative lexicon. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosta, A. (1995). How does this sentence interpret? The semantics of English mediopassives. In B. Aarts & C. F. Meyer (Eds.), The verb in contemporary English: Theory and description (pp. 123–144). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, M. (2001). The middle and related constructions in English: A cognitive network analysis. English Linguistics, 18(1), 86–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 1), Concept structuring systems. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. (1995). Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory (2nd Ed.). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., Le, Q. V., & Norouzi, M. (2016). Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. Computer Science: Computation and Language, 2, 1–23.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, K. (1998). Encyclopaedic structure of nominals and middle expressions in English. Kobe paper in Linguistics, 1, 112–140.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, K., & Taylor J. (2004). What makes a good middle? The role of qualia in the interpretation and acceptability of middle expressions in English. English Language and Linguistics, 8(2), 293–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar