Cover not available
Part of
Historical Linguistics 2019: Selected papers from the 24th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Canberra, 1–5 July 2019
Edited by Bethwyn Evans, Maria Kristina Gallego and Luisa Miceli
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 367] 2024
► pp. 74–108

Chapter 4
Solving Galton’s problem

Practical solutions for analysing language diversity and evolution

| Australian National University
Comparisons between languages can illuminate processes of language change by revealing meaningful associations between language features or the influence of external factors on the patterns and rates of language change. But comparisons between languages raise statistical challenges, because close relatives will tend to be more similar to each other, compared with more distantly related languages, and languages from the same areas will be subject to many of the same influences. Therefore, observations made on different languages will usually fail to meet the requirement of statistical independence inherent in standard statistical testing. This fundamental challenge of cross-cultural analysis, known as Galton’s problem, is no cause for despair because there are a range of workable solutions using widely available data. This paper discusses a range of practical solutions, including phylogenetic analysis, sister pair comparisons, and spatially structured models, that can be applied to analyses of language variation and change.
Keywords: cross-cultural analysis, Galton, phylogenetic non-independence, language diversity
Article outline
  • 1.What is Galton’s problem?
  • 2.Who has Galton’s problem?
  • 3.Practical solutions to the problem of relatedness
    • 3.1Solution 1: Use a phylogeny
    • 3.2Solution 2: Use taxonomic information
    • 3.3Solution 3: Sister pairs
  • 4.Practical solutions to the problem of proximity
    • 4.1Solution 1: Grid-based spatial data
    • 4.2Solution 2: Distance between languages
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (104)
References
Adelaar, Willem F. 2012. Modeling convergence: Towards a reconstruction of the history of Quechuan–Aymaran interaction. Lingua 122(5). 461–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amano, Tatsuya, Brody S. Sandel, Heidi Eager, Edouard Bulteau, Jens-Christian Svenning, Bo Dalsgaard, Carsten Rahbek, Richard G. Davies & William J. Sutherland. 2014. Global distribution and drivers of language extinction risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1793). 20141574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Quentin D. & Russell D. Gray. 2005. Curious parallels and curious connections — phylogenetic thinking in biology and historical linguistics. Systematic Biology 54(4). 513–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, Chiara, Damián E. Blasi, Epifanía Arango-Isaza, Alexandros G. Sotiropoulos, Harald Hammarström, Søren Wichmann, Simon J. Greenhill et al. 2022. A global analysis of matches and mismatches between human genetic and linguistic histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(47). e2122084119. Google Scholar
Bastide, Paul, Claudia Solís-Lemus, Ricardo Kriebel, K. William Sparks & Cécile Ané. 2018. Phylogenetic comparative methods on phylogenetic networks with reticulations. Systematic Biology 67(5). 800–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blomberg, Simon P., Theodore Garland, Jr. & Anthony R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57(4). 717–745.Google Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337(6097). 957–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco R., Claire Bowern & Quentin D. Atkinson. 2018. The origin and expansion of Pama–Nyungan languages across Australia. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2(4). 741–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bromham, Lindell. 2016. Testing hypotheses in macroevolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55. 47–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Curiously the same: Swapping tools between linguistics and evolutionary biology. Biology & Philosophy 32(6). 855–886. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Six impossible things before breakfast: Assumptions, models, and belief in molecular dating. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 34(5). 474–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Meaning and purpose: Using phylogenies to investigate human history and cultural evolution. Biological Theory, pp.1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bromham, Lindell & Keaghan J. Yaxley. 2023. Neighbours and relatives: accounting for spatial distribution when testing causal hypotheses in cultural evolution. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 5: e27. Google Scholar
Bromham, Lindell, Sebastián Duchêne, Xia Hua, Andrew M. Ritchie, David A. Duchêne & Simon Y. W. Ho. 2018a. Bayesian molecular dating: Opening up the black box. Biological Reviews 93(2). 1165–1191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bromham, Lindell, Xia Hua, Marcel Cardillo, Hilde Schneemann & Simon J. Greenhill. 2018b. Parasites and politics: Why cross-cultural studies must control for relatedness, proximity and covariation. Royal Society Open Science 5(8).181100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bromham, Lindell, Xia Hua, Thomas G. Fitzpatrick & Simon J. Greenhill. 2015. Rate of language evolution is affected by population size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 112(7). 2097–2102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bromham, Lindell, Alexander Skeels, Hilde Schneemann, Russell Dinnage & Xia Hua. 2021. There is little evidence that spicy food in hot countries is an adaptation to reducing infection risk. Nature Human Behaviour 5. no.7: 878–891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryant, David, Flavia Filimon & Russell D. Gray. 2005. Untangling our past: Languages, trees, splits and networks. In Ruth Mace, Clare J. Holden & Stephen Shennan (eds.), The evolution of cultural diversity: A phylogenetic approach, 77–93. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Bulmer, Michael. 2003. Francis Galton: Pioneer of heredity and biometry. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardillo, Marcel, Lindell Bromham & Simon J. Greenhill. 2015. Links between language diversity and species richness can be confounded by spatial autocorrelation. Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282. 20142986. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, M. Keith. 2013. The effect of language on economic behavior: Evidence from savings rates, health behaviors, and retirement assets. American Economic Review 103(2). 690–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collard, Ian F. & Robert A. Foley. 2002. Latitudinal patterns and environmental determinants of recent human cultural diversity: Do humans follow biogeographical rules? Evolutionary Ecology Research 4(3). 371–383.Google Scholar
Collins, Jeremy. 2016. Commentary: The role of language contact in creating correlations between humidity and tone. Journal of Language Evolution 1(1). 46–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Real and spurious correlations involving tonal languages. In N. J. Enfield (ed.), Dependencies in language, 129–140. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Daneyko, Thora & Christian Bentz. 2019. Click languages tend to have large consonant inventories: Implications for language evolution and change. In Yonatan Sahle, Hugo Reyes-Centeno & Christian Bentz (eds.), Modern Human Origins and Dispersal, 315–329. Tübigen: Kerns Verlag.Google Scholar
Dediu, Dan. 2018. Making genealogical language classifications available for phylogenetic analysis: Newick trees, unified identifiers, and branch length. Language Dynamics and Change 8(1). 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dediu, Dan & D. Robert Ladd. 2007. Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin. National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 104(26). 10944–10949. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denis, Daniel J. 2001. The origins of correlation and regression: Francis Galton or Auguste Bravais and the error theorists. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin 13(2). 36–44.Google Scholar
Dow, Malcolm M. & E. Anthon Eff. 2008. Global, regional, and local network autocorrelation in the standard cross-cultural sample. Cross-Cultural Research 42(2). 148–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Simon J. Greenhill, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray. 2011. Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473(7345). 79–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Robert R., T. Jonathan Davies, Nyeema C. Harris & Michael C. Gavin. 2010. Global drivers of human pathogen richness and prevalence. Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277(1694). 2587–2595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig. 2019. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 22nd edn. ([URL]). Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Eff, Anthon. 2004. Does Mr. Galton still have a problem? Autocorrelation in the standard cross-cultural sample. World Cultures 15(2). 153–170.Google Scholar
Everett, Caleb, Damián E. Blasí & Seán G. Roberts. 2016. Language evolution and climate: The case of desiccation and tone. Journal of Language Evolution 1(1). 33–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, Joseph. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist 125(1). 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fincher, Corey L. & Randy Thornhill. 2008. A parasite-driven wedge: Infectious diseases may explain language and other biodiversity. Oikos 117(9). 1289–1297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flannery, Timothy. 1995. Mammals of New Guinea. Sydney: Reed Books.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 2000. The languages of New Guinea. Annual Review of Anthropology 29(1). 357–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folyovich, András, Tamás Jarecsny, Dorottya Janoska, Eszter Dudas, Katalina Anna Beres-Molnar, Nóra Botos, Dávid Biczo & Gergely Toldi. 2019. Csokoládéfogyasztás és a magyar Nobel-díjasok [Chocolate consumption and Hungarian Nobel laureates]. Orv Hetil 160(1). 26–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freckleton, Robert P. & Walter Jetz. 2008. Space versus phylogeny: Disentangling phylogenetic and spatial signals in comparative data. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276(1654). 21–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galton, Francis. 1889a. Comment on ‘On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions; Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent’ by E. B. Tylor. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 18. 245–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1889b. I. Co-relations and their measurement, chiefly from anthropometric data. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 45(273–279). 135–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1906. Cutting a round cake on scientific principles. Nature 75. 173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Russell D., Alexei J. Drummond & Simon J. Greenhill. 2009. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323(5913). 479–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J. 2018. Treemaker: A Python tool for constructing a Newick formatted tree from a set of classifications. The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) 3(31). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Quentin D. Atkinson, Andrew Meade & Russell D. Gray. 2010. The shape and tempo of language evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277(1693). 2443–2450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Robert Blust & Russell D. Gray. 2008. The Austronesian basic vocabulary database: From bioinformatics to lexomics. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 4. 271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J. & Russell D. Gray. 2009. Austronesian language phylogenies: Myths and misconceptions about Bayesian computational methods. In Alexander Adelaar and Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Robert Blust. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. 375–397.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Xia Hua, Caela F. Welsh, Hilde Schneemann & Lindell Bromham. 2018. Population size and the rate of language evolution: A test across Indo-European, Austronesian, and Bantu languages. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grollemund, Rebecca, Simon Branford, Koen Bostoen, Andrew Meade, Chris Venditti & Mark Pagel. 2015. Bantu expansion shows that habitat alters the route and pace of human dispersals. National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 112(43). 13296–13301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guernier, Vanina, Michael E. Hochberg & Jean-François Guégan. 2004. Ecology drives the worldwide distribution of human diseases. PLoS Biology 2(6). e141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath. 2019. Glottolog 4.0. ([URL]). Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.Google Scholar
Harmon, Luke J. 2019. Phylogenetic comparative methods. Moscow, ID: Independent publication.Google Scholar
Harvey, Paul H. & Mark D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Paul H. & Andy Purvis. 1991. Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351(6328). 619–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haynie, Hannah J. & Claire Bowern. 2016. Phylogenetic approach to the evolution of color term systems. National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 113(48). 13666–13671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhna, Sebastian, Michael J. Landis, Tracy A. Heath, Bastien Boussau, Nicolas Lartillot, Brian R. Moore, John P. Huelsenbeck & Fredrik Ronquist. 2016. RevBayes: Bayesian phylogenetic inference using graphical models and an interactive model-specification language. Systematic Biology 65(4). 726–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hua, Xia, Simon J. Greenhill, Marcel Cardillo, Hilde Schneemann & Lindell Bromham. 2019. The ecological drivers of variation in global language diversity. Nature Communications 10(1). 2047. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huey, Raymond B., Theodore Garland, Jr. & Michael Turelli. 2019. Revisiting a key innovation in evolutionary biology: Felsenstein’s “Phylogenies and the comparative method”. The American Naturalist 193(6). 755–772. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian, Peter Graff, William Croft & Daniel Pontillo. 2011. Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology 15(2). 281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jetz, Walter, Gavin H. Thomas, Jeffery B. Joy, Klaas Hartmann & Arne O. Mooers. 2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491(7424). 444–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Fiona M. 2011. A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of Austronesian sibling terminologies. Human Biology 83(2). 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitchen, Andrew, Christopher Ehret, Shiferaw Assefa & Connie J. Mulligan. 2009. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Semitic languages identifies an Early Bronze Age origin of Semitic in the Near East. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276(1668). 2703–2710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koplenig, Alexander. 2019. Language structure is influenced by the number of speakers but seemingly not by the proportion of non-native speakers. Royal Society Open Science 6(2). 181274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kummu, Matti & Olli Varis. 2011. The world by latitudes: A global analysis of human population, development level and environment across the north–south axis over the past half century. Applied Geography 31(2). 495–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanfear, Robert, John J. Welch & Lindell Bromham. 2010. Watching the clock: Studying variation in rates of molecular evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25(9). 495–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Sean & Toshikazu Hasegawa. 2011. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis supports an agricultural origin of Japonic languages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1725). 3662–3669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & Russell D. Gray. 2012. Tools from evolutionary biology shed new light on the diversification of languages. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(3). 167–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Rick Dale. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1):e8559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mace, Ruth & Mark Pagel. 1994. The comparative method in anthropology. Current Anthropology 35(5). 549–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. A latitudinal gradient in the density of human languages in North America. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 261(1360). 117–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013a. Absence of Common Consonants ([URL]). In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online (WALS). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Tone ([URL]). In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Martins, Emilia P. 1996. Conducting phylogenetic comparative studies when the phylogeny is not known. Evolution 50(1). 12–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maurage, Pierre, Alexandre Heeren & Mauro Pesenti. 2013. Does chocolate consumption really boost Nobel Award chances? The peril of over-interpreting correlations in health studies. The Journal of Nutrition 143(6). 931–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messerli, Franz H. 2012. Chocolate consumption, cognitive function, and Nobel laureates. New England Journal of Medicine 367(16). 1562–1564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murdock, George P. & Douglas R. White. 1969. A standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology 8(4). 329–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naroll, Raoul. 1965. Galton’s problem: The logic of cross-cultural analysis. Social Research 32(4). 428–451.Google Scholar
Nelson-Sathi, Shijulal, Johann-Mattis List, Hans Geisler, Heiner Fangerau, Russell D. Gray, Willam Martin & Tal Dagan. 2011. Networks uncover hidden lexical borrowing in Indo-European language evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278(1713). 1794–1803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nettle, Daniel. 1998. Explaining global patterns of language diversity. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 17(4). 354–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunn, Charles L., Sonia M. Altizer, Wes Sechrest & Andrew A. Cunningham. 2005. Latitudinal gradients of parasite species richness in primates. Diversity and Distributions 11(3). 249–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orme, David, Rob Freckleton, Gavin Thomas, Thomas Petzoldt, Susanne Fritz & Nick Isaac. 2013. The caper package: Comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. R Package Version 5(2). 1–36.Google Scholar
Paradis, Emmanuel. 2014. An introduction to the phylogenetic comparative method. In László Zsolt Garamszegi (ed.), Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology, 3–18. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Karl. 1920. Notes on the history of correlation. Biometrika 13(1). 25–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poulin, Robert. 2014. Parasite biodiversity revisited: Frontiers and constraints. International Journal for Parasitology 44(9). 581–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purvis, Andy & Lindell Bromham. 1997. Estimating the transition/transversion ratio from independent pairwise comparisons with an assumed phylogeny. Journal of Molecular Evolution 44(1). 112–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rankin, Robert L. 2003. The comparative method. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 183–212. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raviv, Limor, Antje Meyer & Shiri Lev-Ari. 2019. Larger communities create more systematic languages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286(1907). 20191262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Seán & James Winters. 2013. Linguistic diversity and traffic accidents: Lessons from statistical studies of cultural traits. PLOS ONE 8(8). e70902. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Seán G., James Winters & Keith Chen. 2015. Future tense and economic decisions: Controlling for cultural evolution. PLOS ONE 10(7). e0132145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shipley, Bill. 2002. Cause and correlation in biology: A user’s guide to path analysis, structural equations and causal inference, 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sokolov, Alexander N., Marina A. Pavlova, Sibylle Klosterhalfen & Paul Enck. 2013. Chocolate and the brain: Neurobiological impact of cocoa flavanols on cognition and behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 37(10, Part 2). 2445–2453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanton, Jeffrey M. 2001. Galton, Pearson, and the peas: A brief history of linear regression for statistics instructors. Journal of Statistics Education 9(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Symonds, Matthew R. E. & Simon P. Blomberg. 2014. A primer on phylogenetic least squares regression. In László Zsolt Garamszegi (ed.), Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology, 105–130. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajima, Fumio. 1993. Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis. Genetics 135(2). 599–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tishkoff, Sarah A., Mary Katherine Gonder, Brenna M. Henn, Holly Mortensen, Alec Knight, Christoper Gignoux, Neil Fernandopulle, Godfrey Lema, Thomas B. Nyambo, Uma Ramakrishnan, Floyd A. Reed & Joanna L. Mountain. 2007. History of click-speaking populations of Africa inferred from mtDNA and Y chromosome genetic variation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24(10). 2180–2195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turvey, Samuel T. & Nathalie Pettorelli. 2014. Spatial congruence in language and species richness but not threat in the world’s top linguistic hotspot. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1796). 20141644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tylor, Edward B. 1889. On a method of investigating the development of institutions; Applied to laws of marriage and descent. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 18. 245–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webb, Campbell O. & Michael J. Donoghue. 2005. Phylomatic: Tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Molecular Ecology Notes 5(1). 181–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weir, Jason T. & David Wheatcroft. 2010. A latitudinal gradient in rates of evolution of avian syllable diversity and song length. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1712). 1713–1720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Welch, John J. & David Waxman. 2008. Calculating independent contrasts for the comparative study of substitution rates. Journal of Theoretical Biology 251(4). 667–678. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willems, Matthieu, Etienne Lord, Louise Laforest, Gilbert Labelle, François-Joseph Lapointe, Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Vladimir Makarenkov. 2016. Using hybridization networks to retrace the evolution of Indo-European languages. BMC Evolutionary Biology 16(1). 180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanne, Amy E., David C. Tank, William K. Cornwell, Jonathan M. Eastman, Stephen A. Smith, Richard G. Fitzjohn, Daniel J. McGlinn, Brian C. O’Meara, Angela T. Moles, Peter B. Reich, Dana L. Royer, Douglas E. Soltis, Peter F. Stevens, Mark Westoby, Ian J. Wright, Lonnie Aarssen, Robert I. Bertin, Andre Calaminus, Rafaël Govaerts, Frank Hemmings, Michelle R. Leishman, Jacek Oleksyn, Pamela S. Soltis, Nathan G. Swenson, Laura Warman & Jeremy M. Beaulieu. 2014. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506. 89–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar