Cover not available
Part of
The Boundary between Grammar and Lexicon: Evidence from Japanese verb morphology
Brent de Chene
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 368] 2025
► pp. 238–258

References

This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax. A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akiyama, Shoji. 1961. Kumamoto. In Misao Tojo, Yoshimoto Endo, Teruo Hirayama, Tadatoshi Okubo, and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyushu and Ryukyu dialects] (Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 4), 208–238. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Albright, Adam. 2002. The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 2008. Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 144–181. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Paradigms. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 1972–2001. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albright, Adam, Argelia Andrade, and Bruce Hayes. 2000. Segmental environments of Spanish diphthongization. MS, UCLA. Published in Albright, Adam, and Taehong Cho (eds.). 2001. UCLA working papers in linguistics 7 (Papers in phonology 5), 117–151. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2005. On the syntax and morphology of Greek participles. Talk presented at the Workshop on the Morphosyntax of Modern Greek, LSA Institute, Cambridge, MA.
Alkire, Ti, and Carol Rosen. 2010. Romance languages. A historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2016. Inner and outer morphology in Greek adjectival participles. In Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 431–460. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena, and Yota Samioti. 2011. Idiomatic meaning and the structure of participles. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) 19: 101–110.Google Scholar
. 2013. Allosemy, idioms, and their domains: Evidence from adjectival participles. In Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali, and Robert Truswell (eds.), Syntax and its limits, 218–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Domains within words and their meanings: A case study. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer, and Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 81–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1969. A study in diachronic morphophonemics: The Ukrainian prefixes. Language 45. 807–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1982. Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13. 571–612.Google Scholar
1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andriotis, Nikolaos. 1961. To idíoma tou Livisíou tis Lykías [The dialect of Livisi in Lycia]. Athens: Center of Asia Minor Studies.Google Scholar
Aoki, Hirofumi. 2010. Gokeisei kara mita Nihongobunpōshi [Japanese grammatical history viewed from word-formation]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Arakaki, Tomoko. 2003. A grammatical study of Luchuan — Focusing upon the verb forms in Shuri dialect. In Atsuko Izuyama (ed.), Studies on Luchuan Grammar, 163–216. Osaka: Osaka Gakuin Daigaku Joho Gakubu.Google Scholar
Arimoto, Mitsuhiko. 2001a. Ryūkyū Yonaguni Sonai hōgen no dōshi katsuyōkei no goi on’inron [Lexical phonology of the verbal inflected forms of the Ryukyu dialect of Sonai, Yonaguni] (1) Yasuda Joshi Daigaku Kiyō [Bulletin of Yasuda Women’s University] 29. 1–11.Google Scholar
. 2001b. Ryūkyū Yonaguni Sonai hōgen no dōshi katsuyōkei no goi on’inron [Lexical phonology of the verbal inflected forms of the Ryukyu dialect of Sonai, Yonaguni] (2). Kokugo Kokubun Ronshū (Yasuda Joshi Daigaku) [Papers on Japanese Language and Literature (Yasuda Women’s University)] 31. 11–19.Google Scholar
. 2002a. Ryūkyū Yonaguni Sonai hōgen no dōshi katsuyōkei no goi on’inron [Lexical phonology of the verbal inflected forms of the Ryukyu dialect of Sonai, Yonaguni] (3). Yasuda Joshi Daigaku Kiyō [Bulletin of Yasuda Women’s University] 30. 1–10.Google Scholar
. 2002b. Ryūkyū Yonaguni Sonai hōgen no dōshi katsuyōkei no goi on’inron [Lexical phonology of the verbal inflected forms of the Ryukyu dialect of Sonai, Yonaguni] (4). Kokugo Kokubun Ronshū (Yasuda Joshi Daigaku) [Papers on Japanese Language and Literature (Yasuda Women’s University)] 32. 11–15.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, David. 1973. A generative study of the inflectional morphophonemics of the Shuri dialect of Ryukyuan. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Aso, Reiko. 2015. Hateruma Yaeyama grammar. In Patrick Heinrich, Shinsho Miyara, and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 423–447. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Audring, Jenny, and Francesca Masini (eds.). 2019. The Oxford handbook of morphological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Azevedo, Milton M. 2005. Portuguese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1996. The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese: [URL]
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Michael. 2009. Phonological trends in the lexicon: The role of constraints. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Beekes, Robert S. P. 1995. Comparative Indo-European linguistics. An introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2007. Diachronic phonology. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 497–517. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Cyclicity. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2019–2048. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus 25. 3–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In Patrick Honeybone and Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 374–399. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, and Ana R. Luís. 2016. A view of the morphome debate. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero and Ana R. Luís (eds.), The morphome debate, 309–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, and Graeme Trousdale. 2012. Cycles and continua: On unidirectionality and gradualness in language change. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 691–720. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2016. Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2008. Consonant epenthesis: Natural and unnatural histories. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 79–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Bernard. 1946. Studies in colloquial Japanese I. Inflection. Journal of the American Oriental Society 66. 97–109. Reprinted in Bloch, Bernard. 1970. Bernard Bloch on Japanese, edited with an introduction by Roy Andrew Miller, 1–24. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
. 1946. Algonquian. In Harry Hoijer (ed.), Linguistic structures of native America (Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6), 85–129. New York.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier, and Gregory Stump. 2016. Paradigm function morphology. In Andrew Hippisley and Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 449–481. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1992. Compounding in Dutch. Rivista di Linguistica 4. 37–59.Google Scholar
. 1993. Against split morphology. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993, 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen, and Stephen Wechsler. 2016. Lexical-functional syntax, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan, and Andrew Hippisley. 2012. Network morphology: A defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1933. Comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 2001. Zero derivations. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 658–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Surface-to-surface morphology: When your representations turn into constraints. In Paul Boucher (ed.), Many morphologies, 142–177. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10. 425–455. Reprinted in Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language, 167–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. 1961. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Casali, Roderic F. 1997. Vowel elision in hiatus contexts: Which vowel goes? Language 73. 493–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Resolving hiatus. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Chen, Victoria, and Bradley McDonnell. 2019. Western Austronesian voice. Annual Review of Linguistics 5. 173–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chew, John J. 1973. A transformational analysis of modern colloquial Japanese. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana. 2002. The phonology of Romanian. A constraint-based approach. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The logical structure of linguistic theory. MS, Harvard University. Partially revised version published as Chomsky, Noam. 1975. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1964a. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in Fodor, Jerry A., and Jerrold J. Katz (eds.). 1964. The structure of language, 50–118. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
. 1964b. The logical basis of linguistic theory. In Horace Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguists, 914–978. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1994. Bare phrase structure (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL. Reprinted in Campos, Héctor, and Paula Kempchinsky (eds.). 1995. Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory, 51–109. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Reprinted in Webelhuth, Gert (ed.). 1995. Government and binding theory and the minimalist program, 383–439. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chung, Sung-Yeo, and Masayoshi Shibatani. 2018. Causative constructions in Japanese and Korean. In Prashant Pardeshi and Taro Kageyama (eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics, 137–172. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N., and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1983. CV phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart, and Hyunsook Kang. 2006. English loanwords and the word-final [t] problem in Korean. Eohak Yeonku (Seoul Taehakkyo) [Language Research (Seoul National University)] 42. 253–274.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard M. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose. 2017. External possession and possessor raising. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd ed., 1509–1540. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Chene, Brent. 1983. Morphological n-epenthesis in Sanskrit. In Shiro Hattori and Kazuko Inoue (eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth international congress of linguists, 689–692. Tokyo: Comité International Permanent des Linguistes.Google Scholar
. 1985. r-Epenthesis and the Japanese verb. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 10. 172–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Keitai on’inron ni okeru shinriteki jitsuzaisei: Nihongo no dōshi no baai [Psychological reality in morphophonology: The case of the Japanese verb]. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), Kotoba kara mita kokoro [Mind viewed from language], 145–180. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
. 2014. Probability matching versus probability maximization in morphophonology: The case of Korean noun inflection. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin 17. 1–13.Google Scholar
. 2016. Description and explanation in morphophonology: The case of Japanese verb inflection. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25. 37–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Root-based syntax and Japanese derivational morphology. In Claire Bowen, Laurence Horn, and Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On looking into words (and beyond), 117–135. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
. 2019. r-Epenthesis and Ryukyuan. Gengo Kenkyu 155. 101–130.Google Scholar
. 2020a. On the (ir)regularity of Dunan verbal morphophonology. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 36. 253–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022a. Sanskrit nominal stem gradation without morphomes. Word Structure 15. 28–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022b. Syntactic and lexical -ase- are distinct suffixes. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 38. 193–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. to appear. Stem inalterability in Japonic. Journal of Japanese Linguistics.
de Lacy, Paul. 2006. Markedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria, and Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 2002. Word: A typological framework. In R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word. A cross-linguistic typology, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1989. Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42. 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David. 2021. The motivation for roots in distributed morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics 7. 69–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David, and Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39. 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke. 2008. On reconstruction of Proto-Japanese and pre-Old Japanese verb inflection. In Bjarke Frellesvig and John Whitman (eds.), Proto-Japanese, 175–192. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. A history of the Japanese language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke, and John Whitman. 2008. Introduction. In Bjarke Frellesvig and John Whitman (eds.), Proto-Japanese, 1–9. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Nozomi. 2019. Kodomo no jikokenkōkanrinōryoku no kōjō o mezashite [Towards an increase in childrens’ health self-management abilities]. Kyōiku Kenkyū Ronbun [Papers in Educational Research] (Funabashi-shi Sogo Kyoiku Sentaa [Funabashi City Integrated Educational Center]) 54. 14–20.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Kazuhiko. 2004. Conspiracy of form and function for optimization of language change. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13. 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukushima, Kunimichi. 1969. “myū” to “myō” no kōtai [Variation between “myū” and “myō”]. In Masayoshi Oki, Yasuo Kitahara, Hideo Komatsu, Norio Nakada, Kazuo Mabuchi, and Muneaki Morino (eds.), Saeki Umetomo hakase koki kinen kokugogaku ronshū [Papers in Japanese linguistics offered to Dr. Umetomo Saeki on his 70th birthday], 533–551. Tokyo: Hyogensha.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew. 2008. Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 125–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 2013. Algonquian linguistic change and reconstruction. In Philip Baldi (ed.), Patterns of change — change of patterns. Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology, 55–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goto, Kazuhiko. 1961. Kagoshima/Miyazaki nanbu [Kagoshima and southern Miyazaki]. In Misao Tojo, Yoshimoto Endo, Teruo Hirayama, Tadatoshi Okubo, and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyushu/Ryukyu dialects] (Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 4), 268–293. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1990. Do the classical morphological types have clear-cut limits? In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer and John R. Rennison (eds.), Contemporary morphology, 297–308. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1973. Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: An Australian example. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Diachronic, areal, and typological linguistics (Current Trends in Linguistics 11), 401–458. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. A. 2011. Coronals. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 267–287. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1962. Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18. 54–72. Reprinted in Fodor, Jerry A., and Jerrold J. Katz (eds.). 1964. The structure of language, 334–352. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
. 1973. Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 3–16.Google Scholar
. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang, and Martha McGinnis (eds.), PF: Papers at the interface (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30), 425–449. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In Andrew Carnie and Heidi Harley (eds.), Papers on phonology and morphology (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21), 275–288. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
. 2008. On the causative construction. In Shigeru Miyagawa and Mamoru Saito (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, 20–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP*. In Anastasia Giannakidou and Monika Rathert (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 321–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. Lexical decomposition in modern syntactic theory. In Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen, and Edouard Machery (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, 328–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2015. The syntax-morphology interface. In Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax — theory and analysis, vol. 2, 1128–1154. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi, and Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology. Glot International 4.4. 3–9.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi and Rolf Noyer. 2000. Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations. In Bert Peeters (ed.), The lexicon-encyclopedia interface, 349–374. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, James W. 1974. Evidence from Portuguese for the “Elsewhere Condition” in phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 61–80.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Nobuko. 1999. Seisei nihongogaku nyūmon [Introduction to the generative grammar of Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
. 2007. The possessor raising construction and the interpretation of the subject. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, 66–92. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1996. Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 43–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45. 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hattori, Shiro. 1955. Ryūkyūgo V: Bunpō. [Ryukyuan V: Grammar]. In Sanki Ichikawa and Shiro Hattori (eds.), Sekai gengo gaisetsu [An introduction to the languages of the world], vol. 2, 328–353. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, and James White. 2015. Saltation and the P-map. Phonology 32. 267–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, Patrick, Shinsho Miyara, and Michinori Shimoji. 2015. Introduction: Ryukyuan languages and Ryukyuan linguistics. In Patrick Heinrich, Shinsho Miyara, and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 1–10. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hensey, Fritz G. 1972. Portuguese vowel alternation. In Jean Casagrande and Bohdan Saciuk (eds.), Generative studies in Romance languages, 285–292. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hikosaka, Yoshinobu. 1999. Kyūshū ni okeru ichi/nidan katsuyō no godanka — “Kōgohō” kara GAJ e [The assimilation of unigrade and bigrade inflection to consonant-stem inflection in Kyushu — from the Spoken usage survey report to the GAJ]. In Takeyoshi Sato (ed.), Goi/gohō no shinkenkyū [New research on lexicon and grammar], 277–292. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew, and Gregory Stump (eds.). 2016. The Cambridge handbook of morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirayama, Teruo. 1988. Minami Ryūkyū no hōgen kiso goi [Basic vocabulary of southern Ryukyu dialects]. Tokyo: Ofusha.Google Scholar
Hirayama, Teruo, and Masachie Nakamoto. 1964. Ryūkyū Yonaguni hōgen no kenkyū [Research on the Ryukyu dialect of Yonaguni]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Hirayama, Teruo, and Ichiro Oshima. 1969. Gotō rettō no hōgen [The dialects of the Goto archipelago]. Tokyo: Tokyo Toritsu Daigaku Toshi Kenkyu Iinkai [Tokyo Metropolitan University Urban Research Committee].Google Scholar
Hirayama, Teruo, Ichiro Oshima, and Masachie Nakamoto. 1966. Ryūkyū hōgen no sōgōteki kenkyū [Comprehensive research on Ryukyu dialects]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
. 1967. Ryūkyū Sakishima hōgen no sōgōteki kenkyū [Comprehensive research on Ryukyu Sakishima dialects]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Hirayama, Teruo, Ichiro Oshima, Makio Ono, Makoto Kuno, Mariko Kuno, and Takao Sugimura (eds.). 1992–1994. Gendai Nihongo hōgen daijiten [Great dictionary of modern Japanese dialects], 9 vols. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Hokama, Shuzen. 1960. Chūsei bunken ni arawareta Ryūkyū hōgen no dōshi [Ryukyu dialect verbs appearing in medieval documents]. Kokugogaku 41. 106–114. Reprinted in Inoue, Fumio, Koichi Shinozaki, Takashi Kobayashi, and Takuichiro Onishi (eds.). 2001. Ryūkyū hōgen kō [Studies on Ryukyu dialects] 2 (Nihon Rettō Hōgen Sōsho [Japanese Dialect Series] 29), 43–51. Tokyo: Yumani Shobo.Google Scholar
Hokama, Shuzen, and Masami Tamaki. 1980. Nantō kayō taisei I: Okinawahen jō [Compilation of songs of the southern islands I: Okinawa book 1]. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.Google Scholar
Hokama, Shuzen et al. (eds.). 2011. Okinawa kogo daijiten [Great historical dictionary of Okinawan], on-demand edition. Tokyo: Kadokawa Gakugei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Holton, David, Geoffrey Horrocks, Marjolijne Janssen, Tina Lendari, Io Manolessou, and Notis Toufexis. 2019. The Cambridge grammar of medieval and early modern Greek, 4 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. 1979. Substantive principles in natural generative phonology. In Daniel A. Dinnsen (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory, 106–125. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56. 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 1997. Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred W., Kostas Kazazis, and Andreas Koutsoudas. 1964. Reference grammar of literary dhimotiki. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 2003. Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002, 245–281. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Igartua, Iván. 2015. From cumulative to separative exponence in inflection: Reversing the morphological cycle. Language 91. 676–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iha, Fuyu. 1933. Ryūkyū no hōgen [Ryukyu dialects]. In Hōgengaku [Dialectology] (Kokugo kagaku kōza [Course in Japanese linguistics] VII). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin. Reprinted in Hattori, Shiro, Seizen Nakasone, and Shuzen Hokama (eds.). 1975. Iha Fuyū Zenshū [Collected writings of Iha Fuyu], vol. 8, 508–549. Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
Iitoyo, Kiichi, Sukezumi Hino, and Ryoichi Sato (eds.). 1982–1986. Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology], 10 vols. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankokai.Google Scholar
Institute of Modern Greek Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. 1998. Lexikó tis koinís Neoellenikís [Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek]. [URL]
Ito, Chiyuki. 2010. Analogy and lexical restructuring in the development of nominal stem inflection from Middle to Contemporary Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19. 357–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, Junko, and Armin Mester. 2004. Morphological contrast and merger: ranuki in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 20. 1–18. Also in the Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itoi, Kan’ichi. 1961. Ōita/Miyazaki hokubu [Oita and northern Miyazaki]. In Misao Tojo, Yoshimoto Endo, Teruo Hirayama, Tadatoshi Okubo, and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyushu/Ryukyu dialects] (Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 4), 239–267. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
. 1983. Ōita-ken no hōgen [The dialects of Oita Prefecture]. In Kiichi Iitoyo, Sukezumi Hino, and Ryoichi Sato (eds.), Kyūshū chihō no hōgen [The dialects of the Kyushu region] (Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology] 9), 237–266. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankokai.Google Scholar
Iwai, Ryusei. 1959. Ishikawa-ken Kanazawa-shi Hikozō ichibanchō. [(The dialect of) Hikozo ichibancho in Kanazawa, Ishikawa Prefecture]. In Nihon hōgen no kijutsuteki kenkyū [Descriptive studies on Japanese dialects], 87–110. Tokyo: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo.Google Scholar
. 1961. Toyama/Ishikawa. In Misao Tojo, Yoshimoto Endo, Teruo Hirayama, Tadatoshi Okubo, and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Seibu hōgen [Western dialects] (Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 3), 84–110. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izuyama, Atsuko. 2012. Yonaguni. In Nicolas Tranter (ed.), The languages of Japan and Korea, 412–457. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51. 639–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, Wesley M. 1982. Transitivity in the Japanese verbal system (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
1992. The transitive structure of events in Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2017. Transitivity. In Masayoshi Shibatani, Shigeru Miyagawa, and Hisashi Noda (eds.), Handbook of Japanese syntax, 55–95. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jinnouchi, Masataka. 1989. Hokubu kyūshū no shin-hōgen [New dialects of northern Kyushu]. In Mitsuo Okumura (ed.), Kyūshū hōgen no shiteki kenkyū [Historical research on Kyushu dialects], 331–347. Tokyo: Ofusha.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho. 2010. Stem-final obstruent variation in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19. 137–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kageyama, Taro. 1999. Word formation. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 297–325. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro, and Wesley M. Jacobsen (eds.). 2016. Transitivity and valency alternations: Studies on Japanese and beyond. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M., and Patricia A. Shaw. 1985. On the theory of lexical phonology. Phonology 2. 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamimura, Takaji. 1983. Kyūshū hōgen no gaisetsu [An outline of Kyushu dialects]. In Kiichi Iitoyo, Sukezumi Hino, and Ryoichi Sato (eds.), Kyūshū chihō no hōgen [The dialects of the Kyushu region] (Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology] 9), 1–28. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankokai.Google Scholar
Karatsareas, Petros. 2011. A study of Cappadocian Greek nominal morphology from a diachronic and dialectological perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Karimata, Shigehisa. 1997a. Miyako hōgen [Miyako dialects]. In Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono, and Eiichi Chino (eds.), Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the dictionary of linguistics)], 388–403. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
. 1997b. Yaeyama hōgen [Yaeyama dialects]. In Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono, and Eiichi Chino (eds.), Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 403–413. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
. 1999. Miyako shohōgen no dōshi “shūshikei” no seiritsu ni tsuite [On the formation of the verbal conclusive form in the dialects of Miyako]. Nihon Tōyō Bunka Ronshū (Ryūkyū Daigaku Hōbungakubu Kiyō) [Japanese Papers on Eastern Culture (Bulletin of the Faculty of Law and Letters, University of the Ryukyus)] 5. 27–51.Google Scholar
. 2005. Okinawa-ken Miyakojima Hirara hōgen no foneemu [The phonemes of the dialect of Hirara, Miyakojima, Okinawa Prefecture]. Nihon Tōyō Bunka Ronshū (Ryūkyū Daigaku Hōbungakubu Kiyō) [Japanese Papers on Eastern Culture (Bulletin of the Faculty of Law and Letters, University of the Ryukyus)] 11. 67–113.Google Scholar
. 2015. Ryukyuan languages: A grammar overview. In Patrick Heinrich, Shinsho Miyara, and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 113–140. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keino, Masaji. 1972. Dōshi no kenkyū [Studies on verbs]. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael, and Charles Kisseberth. 1977. Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. Generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Heung-gyu, and Beom-mo Kang. 2000. Frequency analysis of Korean morpheme and word usage 1. Seoul: Institute of Korean Culture, Korea University.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1971. Historical linguistics. Lecture, University of Maryland. Published in Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in phonology, 57–80. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1972. Review of Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion, by Calvert Watkins. Foundations of Language 9. 277–286.Google Scholar
. 1973. Productivity in phonology. In Michael J. Kenstowicz and Charles W. Kisseberth (eds.), Issues in phonological theory, 169–176. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in phonology, 165–173. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
. 1996. Allomorphy or morphophonology? In Rajendra Singh (ed.), Trubetzkoy’s orphan, 13–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The phonological basis of sound change. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 313–342. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Stratal OT: A synopsis and FAQs. In Yuchau E. Hsiao and Lian-Hee Wee (eds.), Capturing phonological shades within and across languages, 2–44. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2020. Morphological units: Stems. In Rochelle Lieber (ed.), The Oxford encyclopedia of morphology, 33–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ko, Kwang-Mo. 1989. Cheeon kkeuth ui pyeonhwa t > s e taehan saeroun haeseok [A new interpretation of the noun-final change t > s]. Eoneohak [Linguistics] 11. 3–22.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Takashi. 2004. Hōgengakuteki Nihongoshi no hōhō [A dialectological approach to the history of the Japanese language]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Kokugo Chosa Iinkai [Japanese Language Survey Committee]. 1906. Kōgohō chōsa hōkokusho [Report on the survey of spoken usage], 2 vols. Tokyo: Monbusho.Google Scholar
Kokugo Gakkai [Society for Japanese Linguistics]. 1980. Kokugogaku daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese linguistics]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute]. 1953. Chiiki shakai no gengo seikatsu. Tsuruoka ni okeru jittai chōsa. [The linguistic life of regional society. A survey of Tsuruoka]. Tokyo: Shuei Shuppan.Google Scholar
. 1963. Okinawa-go jiten [Dictionary of the Okinawan language]. Tokyo: Okurasho Insatsukyoku.Google Scholar
. 1966–1974. Nihon gengo chizu [Linguistic atlas of Japan], 6 vols. Tokyo: Okurasho Insatsukyoku.Google Scholar
. 1989–2006. Hōgen bunpō zenkoku chizu [Grammar atlas of Japanese dialects], 6 vols. Tokyo: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo. [URL]
Komatsushiro, Yuichi. 1961. Iwate. In Misao Tojo, Yoshimoto Endo, Teruo Hirayama, Tadatoshi Okubo, and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Tōbu hōgen [Eastern dialects] (Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 2), 177–203. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Konishi, Izumi. 2011. Izumo hōgen ni okeru “ichidan katsuyō no ra-gyō godanka” ni kansuru oboegaki [A note concerning “assimilation of vowel-stem to r-stem inflection” in the Izumo dialect]. Ronsō Kokugo Kyoikugaku Fukkan [Papers on Japanese Language Education New Series] 2. 49–60.Google Scholar
Konoshima, Masatoshi. 1961. Aomori. In Misao Tojo, Yoshimoto Endo, Teruo Hirayama, Tadatoshi Okubo, and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Tōbu hōgen [Eastern dialects] (Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 2), 127–148. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Kubo, Miori. 1992. Japanese passives. Hokkaidō Daigaku Gengobunkabu Kiyō [Bulletin of the Institute of Languages and Cultures, Hokkaido University] 23. 231–302.Google Scholar
Kurisu, Kazutaka. 2001. The phonology of morpheme realization. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1960. Gengo no kijutsu [The description of language]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
1993. Lexical and productive causatives in Japanese: An examination of the theory of paradigmatic structure. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 15. 1–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1945–49. La nature des procès dits « analogiques ». Acta Linguistica V. 15–37. Reprinted in Hamp, Eric P., Fred W. Householder, and Robert Austerlitz (eds.). 1966. Readings in linguistics II, 158–174. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kyushu Hogen Gakkai [Kyushu Dialect Society]. 1991. Kyūshū hōgen no kisoteki kenkyū [Basic research on Kyushu dialects], revised ed. Tokyo: Kazama Shobo.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labrune, Laurence. 2014. The phonology of Japanese /r/: A panchronic account. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 23. 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Wayne P. 2004. High vowels, glides, and Japanese phonology. Gengo Kenkyu 125. 1–30.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek, Jyotsna Vaid, and Hsin-Chin Chen. 2011. On the interpretation of alienable vs. inalienable possession: A psycholinguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics 22. 659–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the organization of the lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
. 1992. Deconstructing morphology. Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(edition). 2020. The Oxford encyclopedia of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightner, Theodore. 1968. On the use of minor rules in Russian phonology. Journal of Linguistics 4. 69–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1975. The role of derivational morphology in generative grammar. Language 51. 617–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombard, Alf. 1954. Le verbe Roumain: Étude morphologique, Tome I. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda. 2002. Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology 19. 219–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackridge, Peter. 1985. The modern Greek language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2018. The Romance verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 201–225.Google Scholar
. 2005. Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. The Linguistic Review 22. 429–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Phases and words. In Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), Phases in the theory of grammar, 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
. 2013. Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In Ora Matushansky and Alec Marantz (eds.), Distributed morphology today, 95–115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Gary, Ursula Brinkmann, Harald Clahsen, Richard Wiese, and Steven Pinker. 1995. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29. 189–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Gary, Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, Fei Xu and Harald Clahsen. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57.4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1966. Lexical evidence relating Korean to Japanese. Language 42. 185–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975. A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena, and Ernesto d’Andrade. 2000. The phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumaru, Michio. 2006. minai, miro [‘does not look, look!’]. Gengo 35.12. 40–43.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo. 2016. Phonological and semantic subregularities in noncausative-causative verb pairs in Japanese. In Taro Kageyama and Wesley M. Jacobsen (eds.), Transitivity and valency alternations: Studies on Japanese and beyond, 51–88. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumura, Akira (ed.). 1971. Nihon bunpō daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1988. Daijirin. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1995. Daijirin, 2nd ed. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 1972. Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2002. A thematic guide to optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1968. The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Melissaropoulou, Dimitra. 2013. Gradualness in analogical change as a complexification stage in a language simplification process: A case study from Modern Greek dialects. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri, and Piera Molinelli (eds.), Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, 125–150. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mester, Armin, and Junko Ito. 1989. Feature predictability and underspecification: Palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Language 65. 258–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1984. Blocking and Japanese causatives. Lingua 64. 177–207. Reprinted in Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Case, argument structure, and word order, 169–194, 292 (notes). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Structure and case marking in Japanese. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. (s)ase as an elsewhere causative and the syntactic nature of words. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 16. 67–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Causatives. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 236–268. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2012. Blocking and causatives revisited. In Shigeru Miyagawa, Case, argument structure, and word order, 195–216. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miyaji, Yutaka. 1969. seru/saseru (gendaigo) [seru/saseru (modern language)]. In Akira Matsumoto (ed.), Kotengo/gendaigo joshi jodōshi shōsetsu [Detailed exposition of the particles and auxiliary verbs of the classical and modern language], 89–96. Tokyo: Gakutosha.Google Scholar
Miyara, Shinsho. 1995. Minami Ryūkyū Yaeyama Ishigaki hōgen no bunpō [The grammar of the Ishigaki dialect of Yaeyama, southern Ryukyus]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2015. Shuri Okinawan grammar. In Patrick Heinrich, Shinsho Miyara, and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 379–404. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreton, Elliott, and Joe Pater. 2012a. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, part I: Structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 6. 686–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, part II: Substance. Language and Linguistics Compass 6. 702–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morley, Rebecca L. 2018. Is phonological consonant epenthesis possible? A series of artificial grammar learning experiments. Phonology 35. 649–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakajima, Nobutaro (ed.). 1972. Harima Kako-gun hokubu hōgen kiroku. [Records of the dialect of northern Kako county, Harima]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.Google Scholar
Nakamoto, Masachie. 1990. Nihon rettō gengoshi no kenkyū [Research on the linguistic history of the Japanese archipelago]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya. 2010. No consonant-final stems in Japanese verb morphology. Lingua 120. 2336–2352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew, and Bert Vaux. 2007. Underlying representations that do not minimize grammatical violations. In Sylvia Blaho, Patrik Bye, and Martin Krämer (eds.), Freedom of analysis?, 35–61. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyễn, Ðình-hoà. 1987. Vietnamese. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nihon kokugo daijiten dainihan henshu iinkai/Shogakukan kokugo jiten henshubu [Great dictionary of the Japanese language second edition editorial committee/Shogakukan Japanese dictionary editorial division] (eds.). 2000–2002. Nihon kokugo daijiten [Great dictionary of the Japanese language], 2nd ed. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
Nishio, Minoru, Etsutaro Iwabuchi, and Shizuo Mizutani (eds.). 2000. Iwanami kokugo jiten [Iwanami dictionary of the Japanese language], 6th ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Nishioka, Satoshi. 1993. Ryūka/Kumiodori-go ni okeru “nai” no katsuyō [The conjugation of “nai” in the language of the Ryuka and Kumiodori]. Okinawa Bunka 28.2. 27–39.Google Scholar
Nyrop, Kr. 1908. Grammaire historique de la langue Française, vol. 3. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Oehrle, Richard, and Hiroko Nishio. 1981. Adversity. In Ann Farmer and Chisato Kitagawa (eds.), Proceedings of the Arizona conference on Japanese linguistics (Coyote Papers 2), 163–187. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Linguistics Circle.Google Scholar
Ojeda, Almerindo E. 1982. Some constraints on deletion. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Omodaka, Hisataka et al. (eds.). 1967. Jidaibetsu kokugo daijiten, jōdaihen [Great historical dictionary of Japanese, Nara period]. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Onishi, Takuichiro. 2006. Gengo chirigaku no saikidō [A new start for linguistic geography]. In Seiichi Nakai, Daniel Long, and Kenjiro Matsuda (eds.), Nihon no fiirudo gengogaku [Field linguistics in Japan], 80–93. Toyama: Katsura Shobo.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2016a. Shin Nihon gengo chizu [New linguistic atlas of Japan]. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.Google Scholar
. 2016b. okiru [‘get up’]. In Takuichiro Onishi (ed.), Shin Nihon gengo chizu [New linguistic atlas of Japan], 150–151. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.Google Scholar
. 2016c. okiro [‘get up!’]. In Takuichiro Onishi (ed.), Shin Nihon gengo chizu [New linguistic atlas of Japan], 152–153. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.Google Scholar
Ono, Susumu. 1953. Nihongo no dōshi no katsuyōkei no kigen ni tsuite [On the origin of the verbal inflectional forms of Japanese]. Kokugo to Kokubungaku 350. 47–56.Google Scholar
Ono, Susumu, Akihiro Satake, and Kingoro Maeda (eds.). 1974. Iwanami kogo jiten [Iwanami historical dictionary of Japanese]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Ortmann, Albert. 1999. Affix repetition and non-redundancy in inflectional morphology. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18. 76–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oseki, Yohei. 2017. Voice morphology in Japanese argument structures. MS, New York University. [URL]
. 2021. Bunsan keitairon to Nihongo no tadōsei kōtai [Distributed morphology and Japanese transitivity alternations]. In Hideki Kishimoto (ed.), Rekishikon kenkyū no gendaiteki kadai [Current issues in lexicon research], 1–23. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Oshima, David Y. 2014. On the morphological status of -te, -ta, and related forms in Japanese: Evidence from accent placement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 23. 233–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos, Vassilios Spyropoulos, and Anthi Revithiadou. 2017. Little v as a categorizing verbal head: Evidence from Greek. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco, and Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain, 29–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1920. Prinzipien der sprachgeschichte, 5th ed. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Payne, David L. 1981. The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. University of Texas, Arlington, and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris, and Immanuel Barshi (eds.). 1999. External possession. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pellard, Thomas. 2009. Ōgami: Éléments de description d’un parler du sud des Ryūkyū. Doctoral dissertation, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
. 2016. Nichiryū sogo no bunki nendai [The period of separation of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan]. In Yukinori Takubo, John Whitman, and Tatsuya Hirako (eds.), Ryūkyū shogo to kodai Nihongo: Nichiryū sogo no saiken ni mukete [Ryukyuan and premodern Japanese: Toward the reconstruction of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan], 99–124. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Pellard, Thomas, and Masahiro Yamada. 2017. Verb morphology and conjugation classes in Dunan (Yonaguni). In Ferenc Kiefer, James P. Blevins, and Huba Bartos (eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization: Data and analyses, 31–49. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 2002. A history of the Spanish language, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1988. The split morphology hypothesis: Evidence from Yiddish. In Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology. Approaches in modern linguistics, 79–100. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2002. The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl, and Ivan A. Sag. 1987. Information-based syntax and semantics, vol. 1. Fundamentals. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pross, Tillmann. 2019. What about lexical semantics if syntax is the only generative component of the grammar? A case study on word meaning in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37. 215–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ralli, Angela. 2000. A feature-based analysis of Greek nominal inflection. Glossologia 11–12. 201–227.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (A linguistic history of English, vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2016. The concept of explanatory adequacy. In Ian Roberts (ed.), The Oxford handbook of universal grammar, 97–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Ioão. 1604–1608. Arte da lingoa de Japam. Nagasaki: Collegio de Iapão. Japanese translation by Doi Tadao published as Rodriguez, Ioão. 1955. Nihon daibunten [Great Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Sadakane, Kumi, and Masatoshi Koizumi. 1995. On the nature of the “dative” particle ni in Japanese. Linguistics 33. 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1991. Autolexical syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1995. Review of A-morphous morphology, by Stephen R. Anderson. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13. 326–341.Google Scholar
Sakakura, Atsuyoshi. 1975. Bunshō to hyōgen [Text and expression]. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.Google Scholar
Sakanashi, Ryuzo. 1982. Kindai no bunpō II (Kamigata-hen) [Grammar of the early modern period II (Kyoto-Osaka)]. In Hiroshi Tsukishima (ed.), Bunpōshi [Grammatical history] (Kōza kokugoshi [Course in the history of Japanese] 4), 467–536. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Sasaki, Kan. 2018. Hokkaidō hōgen ni okeru jihatsu gokei no yure [Variation in the spontaneous form in the Hokkaido dialect]. KLS 38 (Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the Kansai Linguistic Society). 205–216.Google Scholar
. 2019. ra-gyō godanka no tayōsei [The diversity of assimilation to r-stem conjugation]. In Taro Kageyama and Hideki Kishimoto (eds.), Rekishikon kenkyū no arata na apuroochi [New approaches to lexicon research], 201–228. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Sasaki, Kan, and Akie Yamazaki. 2006. Two types of detransitive constructions in the Hokkaido dialect of Japanese. In Werner Abraham and Larisa Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology, 352–372. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1987. Tagalog. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 936–958. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul, and Fe T. Otanes. 1972. Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serafim, Leon A., and Rumiko Shinzato. 2021. The language of the Old-Okinawan Omoro Sōshi. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1973. Semantics of Japanese causativization. Foundations of Language 9. 317–373.Google Scholar
. 1976. The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions, 1–40. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1977. Grammatical relations and surface cases. Language 53. 789–809. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimabukuro, Moriyo. 2007. The accentual history of the Japanese and Ryukyuan languages: A reconstruction. Folkestone: Global Oriental. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimabukuro, Yukiko. 1997. Okinawa hokubu hōgen [Dialects of northern Okinawa]. In Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono, and Eiichi Chino (eds.), Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 354–369. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Shinmura, Izuru (ed.). 1991. Kōjien, 4th ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1998. Kōjien, 5th ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel. 2014. The morphology–syntax interface. In Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato, and Daniel Siddiqi (eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax, 345–364. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sihler, Andrew L. 1995. New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siloni, Tal. 2019. Event structure and syntax. In Robert Truswell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure, 456–489. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skoruppa, Katrin, Anna Lambrechts, and Sharon Peperkamp. 2011. The role of phonetic distance in the acquisition of phonological alternations. North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS) 39. 717–729.Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76. 859–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sotiropoulos, Dimitri. 1972. Noun morphology of modern demotic Greek. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sowell, Thomas. 1987. A conflict of visions: Ideological origins of political struggles. New York: Quill.Google Scholar
Stephany, Ursula. 1982. Inflectional and lexical morphology — A linguistic continuum. Glossologia 1. 27–55.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2016. The morphome vs similarity-based syncretism: Latin t-stem derivatives. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero and Ana R. Luís (eds.), The morphome debate, 112–171. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Kazuhiko. 1977. Bunpō no utsurikawari [Grammatical change]. In Atsuyoshi Sakakura (ed.), Nihongo no rekishi [The history of Japanese] (Nihongo kōza [Course in Japanese] 6), 197–242. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Toshizo. 1987a. Ryūkyū no hōgen [Ryukyu dialects] 11 (Yaeyama: Yonaguni-jima). Tokyo: Hosei Daigaku Okinawa Bunka Kenkyujo.Google Scholar
. 1987b. Ryūkyū no hōgen [Ryukyu dialects] 12 (Yaeyama: Yonaguni-jima). Tokyo: Hosei Daigaku Okinawa Bunka Kenkyujo.Google Scholar
. 1991a. Omoro Saushi no dōshi no kenkyū [Research on the verbs of the Omoro Soshi]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.Google Scholar
. 1991b. Omoro Saushi no kokugogakuteki kenkyū [Linguistic research on the Omoro Soshi]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin.Google Scholar
. 1997a. Koten Ryūkyūgo [Classical Ryukyuan]. In Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono, and Eiichi Chino (eds.) Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 422–431. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
. 1997b. Yonaguni hōgen [The Yonaguni dialect]. In Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono, and Eiichi Chino (eds.) Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 413–422. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Maner L. 1983. Ryūkūan language history. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
Thumb, Albert. 1910. Handbuch der neugriechischen Volkssprache, 2nd ed. Strassburg: Trübner. English translation by S. Angus published as Thumb, Albert. 1912. Handbook of the modern Greek vernacular. Edinburgh: Clark. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, Peter. 1978. Bidirectional leveling as evidence for relational rules. Lingua 45. 67–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1982. Local and general markedness. Language 58. 832–849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tojo, Misao (ed.). 1951. Zenkoku hōgen jiten [Nationwide dialect dictionary]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Tojo, Misao, Yoshimoto Endo, Teruo Hirayama, Tadatoshi Okubo, and Takeshi Shibata (eds.). 1961. Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course], 4 vols. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Toyama, Nana. 2013a. Okinawa-ken Shuri hōgen ni okeru shiekibun no imikōzō [The semantic structure of causative sentences in the Shuri dialect of Okinawa Prefecture]. Nihongo Bunpō 13. 105–121.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Okinawa Shuri hōgen no shieki dōshi to tadōsei [Causative verbs and transitivity in the Shuri dialect of Okinawa]. Ryūkyū-Ajia Shakaibunka Kenkyū [Ryukyu/Asia Sociocultural Research] 16. 113–130.Google Scholar
. 2015. Okinawa Shuri hōgen ni okeru voisu to riekisei no kijutsu bunpō kenkyū [Descriptive grammatical study of voice and benefactivity in the Shuri dialect of Okinawa]. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Ryukyus.
Triandaphyllidis, Manolis A. 1949. Mikrí Neoellinikí grammatikí. Athens. English translation by John B. Burke published as Triandaphyllidis, Manolis A. 2004. Concise Modern Greek grammar. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Tsuda, Katsumi. 2000. Ōitaben ni okeru hukanō hyōgen ni tsuite [On expressions of impossibility in the Oita dialect]. Nippon Bunri Daigaku Kiyō [Bulletin of Nippon Bunri University] 28. 116–126.Google Scholar
Tsuhako, Toshiko. 1997. Okinawa chūnanbu hōgen [Dialects of central and southern Okinawa]. In Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono, and Eiichi Chino (eds.) Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 369–388. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Uchima, Chokujin. 1980. Yonaguni hōgen no katsuyō to sono seiritsu [Conjugation of the Yonaguni dialect and its formation]. In Kuroshio bunka no kai [Kuroshio Cultural Association] (ed.), Kuroshio no minzoku, bunka, gengo [The peoples, cultures, and languages of the Kuroshio current], 447–490. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.Google Scholar
. 1982. Ha-gyō yodankei dōshi no katsuyō no tsūjiteki kōsatsu [Diachronic observations on the conjugation of w-stems]. In Kyugakkai Rengo Amami Chosa Iinkai [Union of Nine Learned Societies Amami Survey Committee] (ed.), Amami: Shizen, bunka, shakai [Amami: Nature, culture, society], 300–308. Tokyo: Kobundo.Google Scholar
. 1984a. Miyako shotō no hōgen [The dialects of the Miyako island group]. In Kiichi Iitoyo, Sukezumi Hino, and Ryoichi Sato (eds.), Okinawa/Amami chihō no hōgen [The dialects of the Okinawa/Amami region] (Kōza hōgengaku [Course in dialectology] 10), 251–287. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankokai.Google Scholar
. 1984b. Ryūkyū hōgen bunpō no kenkyū [Research on the grammar of Ryukyu dialects]. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.Google Scholar
Uchima, Chokujin, and Mitsuyoshi Nohara. 2006. Okinawa-go jiten [Okinawan dictionary]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Uemura, Yukio. 1961. Okinawa hontō [The main island of Okinawa]. In Misao Tojo, Yoshimoto Endo, Teruo Hirayama, Tadatoshi Okubo, and Takeshi Shibata (eds.), Kyūshū/Ryūkyū hōgen [Kyushu and Ryukyu dialects] (Hōgengaku kōza [Dialectology course] 4), 334–357. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.Google Scholar
. 1963. Shuri hōgen no bunpō [A grammar of the Shuri dialect]. In Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Language Research Institute], Okinawa-go jiten [Dictionary of the Okinawan language], 58–86. Tokyo: Okurasho Insatsukyoku. English translation by Wayne P. Lawrence in Uemura, Yukio. 2003. The Ryukyuan language, 124–161. Osaka: Osaka Gakuin Daigaku Joho Gakubu.Google Scholar
. 1997. Sōsetsu [Introduction]. In Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono, and Eiichi Chino (eds.), Nihon rettō no gengo (Gengogaku daijiten serekushon) [The languages of the Japanese archipelago (Selection from the Great dictionary of linguistics)], 311–354. Tokyo: Sanseido. English translation by Wayne P. Lawrence in Uemura, Yukio. 2003. The Ryukyuan language, 1–110. Osaka: Osaka Gakuin Daigaku Joho Gakubu.Google Scholar
Umegaki, Minoru. 1962. Mie-ken hōgen [The dialects of Mie Prefecture]. In Minoru Umegaki (ed.), Kinki hōgen no sōgōteki kenkyū [A comprehensive study of the Kinki dialects], 91–157. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Unger, J. Marshall. 1977. Studies in early Japanese morphophonemics (Doctoral dissertation, Yale University). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
. 2000. Reconciling comparative and internal reconstruction: The case of Old Japanese /ti, ri, ni/. Language 76: 655–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. 1987. An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2008. The sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert. 2001. Consonant insertion and hypercorrection. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. [URL]
. 2008. Why the phonological component must be serial and rule-based. In Bert Vaux and Andrew Nevins (eds.), Rules, constraints, and phonological phenomena, 20–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vazou, Elli, and George J. Xydopoulos. 2007. Towards an account of acronyms/initialisms in Greek. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) 17. 233–243.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Rule inversion. Lingua 29. 209–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1974. Words and syllables in natural generative grammar. In Anthony Bruck, Robert A. Fox, and Michael W. LaGaly (eds.), Papers from the parasession on natural phonology, 346–374. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Volpe, Mark. 2005. Japanese morphology and its theoretical consequences: Derivational morphology in distributed morphology. Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University.
Vovin, Alexander. 2010. Koreo-Japonica. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, John. 1985. The phonological basis for the comparison of Japanese and Korean. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
. 2008. The source of the bigrade conjugation and stem-shape in pre-Old Japanese. In Bjarke Frellesvig and John Whitman (eds.), Proto-Japanese, 159–173. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The relationship between Japanese and Korean. In Nicolas Tranter (ed.), The languages of Japan and Korea, 24–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2016. Nichiryū sogo no on’in taikei to rentaikei/izenkei no kigen [The vowel system of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan and the origin of the adnominal/realis forms]. In Yukinori Takubo, John Whitman, and Tatsuya Hirako (eds.), Ryūkyū shogo to kodai Nihongo: Nichiryū sogo no saiken ni mukete [Ryukyuan and premodern Japanese: Toward the reconstruction of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan], 21–38. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1889. Sanskrit grammar, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin B. 1938. From Latin to Portuguese. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Yamada, Masahiro. 2016. Dunan(Yonaguni)go no dōshi keitairon [The verbal morphology of Dunan (Yonaguni)]. In Yukinori Takubo, John Whitman, and Tatsuya Hirako (eds.), Ryūkyū shogo to kodai Nihongo: Nichiryū sogo no saiken ni mukete [Ryukyuan and premodern Japanese: Toward the reconstruction of Proto-Japanese-Ryukyuan], 259–289. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Yamada, Masahiro, Thomas Pellard and Michinori Shimoji. 2015. Dunan grammar (Yonaguni Ryukyuan). In Patrick Heinrich, Shinsho Miyara, and Michinori Shimoji (eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages, 449–478. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, Akiho, and Morihide Akimoto (eds.). 2001. Nihongo bunpō daijiten [Great dictionary of Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, Toshiaki. 1972. Toyohashi chihō no hōgen [The dialect of the Toyohashi region]. In Toshiaki Yoshikawa and Yukihiro Yamaguchi, Toyohashi chihō no hōgen [The dialect of the Toyohashi region], 15–283. Toyohashi: Toyohashi Bunka Kyokai.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie. 2000. Patterned exceptions in phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.