Diachronic phonology with Contrastive Hierarchy Theory
I argue that Contrastive Hierarchy Theory (CHT) makes it possible to implement Roman Jakobson’s 1931 program for diachronic phonology. CHT computes segmental contrasts by
language-particular feature hierarchies and incorporates the Contrastivist Hypothesis, which holds that only contrastive
feature specifications can be active in the phonology. This empirical hypothesis is susceptible to be falsified by the ‘Oops,
I Need That’ Problem. I review two case studies: the evolution of the modern Manchu vowel systems from Classical Manchu, and
changes in i-umlaut from early Germanic to Old English. Both cases adhere to the Contrastivist Hypothesis and
show connections between diachronic change and synchronic analysis as proposed by Jakobson, and between contrast and activity
as predicted by CHT.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The main tenets of Contrastive Hierarchy Theory (CHT)
- 3.An empirical theory: The ‘Oops, I Need That’ Problem
- 4.From the Classical Manchu vowel system to the modern Manchu languages
- 5.From Proto-Germanic to Old English: The short vowels
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgments
-
Notes
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (45)
References
Antonsen, Elmer H. 1972. The Proto-Germanic
syllabics (vowels). In Frans van Coetsem & Herbert L. Kufner (eds.), Toward
a grammar of
Proto-Germanic, 117–40. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Clements, G. N. 2001. Representational
economy in constraint-based phonology. In T. Alan Hall, (ed.), Distinctive
feature
theory, 71–146. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Compton, Richard & B. Elan Dresher. 2011. Palatalization
and ‘strong i’ across Inuit dialects. Canadian Journal of
Linguistics/Revue canadienne de
linguistique 56. 203–28.
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall. 2019. Scope
variation in contrastive hierarchies of morphosyntactic
features. In David W. Lightfoot & Jonathan Havenhill (eds.), Variable
properties in language: Their nature and
acquisition, 27–41. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Dresher, B. Elan. 1985. Old English and the theory
of phonology. New York: Garland Publishing. Reissued 2019 in Routledge Library Editions:
Phonetics and
Phonology, Volume 4. London & New York: Routledge.
Dresher, B. Elan. 1998. On contrast and
redundancy. Presented at the annual meeting of the
Canadian Linguistic Association, Ottawa. Ms., University of Toronto.
Dresher, B. Elan. 2003. Contrast and
asymmetries in inventories. In Anna-Maria di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry
in grammar, volume 2: Morphology, phonology,
acquisition, 239–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dresher, B. Elan. 2009. The contrastive hierarchy in
phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dresher, B. Elan. 2016. Contrast in phonology
1867–1967: History and development. Annual Review of
Linguistics 2. 53–73.
Dresher, B. Elan. 2018. Contrastive feature
hierarchies in Old English diachronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological
Society 116(1). 1–29.
Dresher, B. Elan & Daniel Currie Hall. 2021. The
road not taken: The Sound Pattern of Russian and the history of contrast in
phonology. Journal of
Linguistics 57(2). 405–44.
Dresher, B. Elan, Christopher Harvey, & Will Oxford. 2018. Contrastive
feature hierarchies as a new lens on typology. In Larry Hyman & Frans Plank (eds.), Phonological
typology, 273–311. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Dresher, B. Elan, Glyne Piggott, & Keren Rice. 1994. Contrast
in phonology: Overview. Toronto Working Papers in
Linguistics 13. iii–xvii.
Dresher, B. Elan & Keren Rice. 2007. Markedness
and the contrastive hierarchy in phonology. [URL]
Dresher, B. Elan & Xi Zhang. 2005. Contrast
and phonological activity in Manchu vowel systems. Canadian Journal of
Linguistics/Revue canadienne de
linguistique 50(1–4). 45–82.
Dyck, Carrie. 1995. Constraining
the phonology–phonetics interface, with exemplification from Spanish and Italian
dialects. Toronto: University of Toronto doctoral dissertation.
Hall, Daniel Currie. 2007. The role and
representation of contrast in phonological
theory. Toronto: University of Toronto doctoral dissertation.
Hall, Daniel Currie. 2011. Phonological
contrast and its phonetic enhancement: Dispersedness without
dispersion. Phonology 28(1). 1–54.
Jakobson, Roman. 1972
[1931]. Principles of historical
phonology. In Allan R. Keiler (ed.), A
reader in historical and comparative
linguistics, 121–38. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [English translation of Prinzipien der historischen Phonologie,
Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 4. 247–67,
1931. Copenhagen: Nordisk Sprog — og Kultur Forlag.]
Jakobson, Roman, C. Gunnar, M. Fant, & Morris Halle. 1952. Preliminaries
to speech analysis. MIT Acoustics Laboratory, Technical Report, No.
13. Reissued by MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., Eleventh
Printing, 1976.
Keyser, Samuel Jay & Kenneth N. Stevens. 2006. Enhancement
and overlap in the speech
chain. Language 82(1). 33–63.
Kim, Suksan. 2001. Lexical
Phonology and the fricative voicing rule. Journal of English
Linguistics 29(2). 149–61.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2015. Phonologization. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The
handbook of historical
phonology, 563–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kiparsky, Valentin. 1932. Johdatusta
fonologiaan. Virittäjä 36: 230–50.
Ko, Seongyeon. 2018. Tongue
root harmony and vowel contrast in Northeast Asian
languages. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Korhonen, Mikko. 1969. Die
Entwicklung der morphologischen Methode im Lappischen. Finnisch-Ugrische
Forschungen 37: 203–62.
Lass, Roger. 1994. Old
English: A historical linguistic
companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mackenzie, Sara. 2013. Laryngeal
co-occurrence restrictions in Aymara: Contrastive representations and constraint
interaction. Phonology 30(2). 297–345.
Moulton, Keir. 2003. Deep
allophones in the Old English laryngeal system. Toronto Working Papers in
Linguistics 20. 157–73.
Purnell, Thomas & Eric Raimy. 2015. Distinctive
features, levels of representation and historical
phonology. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The
handbook of historical
phonology, 522–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Purnell, Thomas, Eric Raimy, & Joseph Salmons. 2019. Old
English vowels: Diachrony, privativity, and phonological
representations. Language 95(4). e447–73.
Rice, Keren. 2003. Featural
markedness in phonology: Variation. In Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The
second Glot International state-of-the-article book: The latest in
linguistics, 387–427. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rice, Keren. 2007. Markedness
in phonology. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of
phonology, 79–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ringe, Donald. 2006. A
history of English: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (A linguistic history
of English, Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford Scholarship Online. [URL].
Sandstedt, Jade. 2018. Feature
specifications and contrast in vowel harmony: The orthography and phonology of Old Norwegian height
harmony. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh doctoral dissertation.
Sapir, Edward. 1925. Sound
patterns in
language. Language 1(2). 37–51.
Stevens, Kenneth N., Samuel Jay Keyser, & Haruko Kawasaki. 1986. Toward
a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant
features. In J. S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (eds.), Invariance
and variability in speech
processes, 426–49. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1939. Grundzüge
der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 2001
[1936]. A theory of phonological
oppositions. In Anatoly Liberman (ed.), Studies
in general linguistics and language
structure, 14–21. Translated
by Marvin Taylor & Anatoly Liberman. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. [Essai d’une
théorie des oppositions phonologiques. Journal de psychologie normale et
pathologique 33 (1936). 5–18.]
Twaddell, W. Freeman. 1938. A note on OHG
umlaut. Monatshefte für deutschen
Unterricht 30. 177–181.
Voeltzel, Laurence. 2016. Morphophonologie
des langues scandinaves: Hiérarchie segmentale et complexité
syllabique. Nantes: University of Nantes doctoral dissertation.
Zhang, Xi. 1996. Vowel
systems of the Manchu-Tungus languages of
China. Toronto: University of Toronto doctoral dissertation.