Refurbishing our Foundations
Elementary linguistics from an advanced point of view
Author
This essay challenges several patterns of thinking common in twentieth-century linguistics. The most pervasive of these is our habit of looking at language from the point of view of the speaker. When we take, instead, that of the hearer, matters fall into place in a new way. In syntax, we are led to examine the evidence available to hearers for interpreting what they hear, and this reveals both the true nature and the locus existendi of “deep structure”. Chomsky's 1957 diagnosis of the then prevalent syntactic theory is upheld, though his proposed remedy is not. The principle of Gestalt perception yields a characterization of the word quite different from Bloomfield's classic definition, lending support of new kind to Pike's mid-century views of the relation between phonemics and grammar. In morphology, assuming the hearer's standpoint forces the abondonment of the “atomic morpheme” that has prevailed in America since the post-Bloomfieldians, together with much of classical morphophonemics, and by a domino effect this in turn undermines much of generative phonology.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 56] 1987. x, 181 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
0. Introduction | p. 1
-
1. The shape of speech | p. 4
-
2. Hearing Utterances | p. 16
-
3. The hearer’s evidence | p. 26
-
4. Hearing words | p. 37
-
5. Sounds, words, and redundancy | p. 48
-
6. Why morphemics won’t work | p. 65
-
7. From particle to resonance | p. 77
-
8. How contents means | p. 97
-
9. The craft of speaking | p. 114
-
Notes and commentary | p. 131
-
-
Index | p. 172
Cited by
Cited by 47 other publications
Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf
Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf
Ackerman, Farrell, Robert Malouf & James P. Blevins
ARBIB, MICHAEL A.
Bauer, Laurie
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2016. We do not need structuralist morphemes, but we do need constituent structure. In Morphological Metatheory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 229], ► pp. 387 ff.
BLEVINS, JAMES P.
Blevins, James P., Farrell Ackerman & Robert Malouf
2016. Morphology as an adaptive discriminative system. In Morphological Metatheory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 229], ► pp. 271 ff.
Brooks, Terrence A.
Carruthers, Andrew M.
Carruthers, Andrew M.
Clay, Zanna, Sally Pople, Bruce Hood & Sotaro Kita
Dedio, Stefan
Falk, Julia S.
Folia, Vasiliki, Julia Uddén, Meinou De Vries, Christian Forkstam & Karl Magnus Petersson
Fuchs, Susanne & Leonardo Lancia
Harris, R. Allen
Herce, Borja
Herce, Borja
Hofstra, T.
Hutton, Christopher
Johnstone, Barbara
Juul Nielsen, Peter
Juul-Nielsen, Peter
2019. Diachronic morphology, indexical function and a critique of the morphome analysis. In Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 345], ► pp. 125 ff.
Lee, Penny
1994. New Work on the Linguistic Relativity Question. Historiographia Linguistica 21:1-2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Lee, Penny
Luykx, Aurolyn
Lévêque, Dimitri & Thomas Pellard
Matthews, P. H.
McDonald, Edward
McDonald, Edward
McDonald, Edward
2023. Review of Harris (2021): The linguistics wars: Chomsky, Lakoff, and the battle over deep structure. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 5:1 ► pp. 260 ff.
Méndez Guerrero, Beatriz
Neidorf, Leonard & Rafael J. Pascual
Newmeyer, Frederick
Nieder, Jessica, Fabian Tomaschek, Enum Cohrs & Ruben van de Vijver
Perlman, Marcus
2017. Debunking two myths against vocal origins of language. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 376 ff.
Rasenberg, Marlou, Azeb Amha, Matt Coler, Marjo van Koppen, Emiel van Miltenburg, Lynn de Rijk, Wyke Stommel & Mark Dingemanse
Senghas, Ann, Sotaro Kita & Asli Özyürek
Silverstein, Michael
Verhagen, Arie
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Linguistics
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General