Cover not available
Part of
Children's Cultures after Childhood
Edited by Justyna Deszcz-Tryhubczak and Macarena García-González
[Children’s Literature, Culture, and Cognition 16] 2023
► pp. 71–86

Chapter 5
Childhood and its afterlives

Spectrality and haunting in children’s literature

| University of Cambridge,
There is an opening in the study of children’s literature in the form of spectralities. By way of revealing this lacuna, this chapter diffractively reads J.M Barrie’s Peter Pan through Avery Gordon’s seminal spectral project Ghostly Matters. Reading these texts through one another shows that if we are to begin thinking after childhood, we must shift our conception of childhood away from a binary ontology governed by generational orderings. The argument presented herein is twofold: characters within children’s literature and the children’s book itself exist in dialogue with the past and the future, simultaneously before and after individual and subjective childhoods. Thus, a wider haunting occurs in children’s literature belonging to the so-called spectral turn that scholars have suggested exists across literature and culture.
Keywords: spectrality, hauntology, new materialism, childhood studies
Article outline
  • The spectral turn: An opening to children’s literature studies
  • Children’s literature without binaries?
  • “Poor little half-and-half (…) You will be a Betwixt-and-Between” (Barrie: 121)
  • He escaped, but his shadow hadn’t time to get out (Barrie: 214)
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 8 August 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/clcc.16.05pry
References (50)
References
Primary sources
Barrie, James Matthew. 2019. The Collected Peter Pan, ed. Fairhurst, Robert Douglas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Budd, Robin. 2002. Peter Pan: Return to Never Land. USA: Walt Disney.Google Scholar
Lowery, David. 2023. Peter Pan & Wendy. USA: Walt Disney.Google Scholar
Hamilton S. Luske, Geronimi, Clyde, Jackson, Wilfred, Kinney, Jack, Wallace, Oliver & Plumb, Edward H. 1953. Peter Pan. USA: Walt Disney.Google Scholar
Reed, Dan. 2019. Leaving NeverLand. USA: Netflix.Google Scholar
Spielberg, Steven. 1991. Hook. USA: Amblin Entertainment.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Robert Louis. 1885. A Child’s Garden of Verses. Reprint, London: Puffin, 2008.Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Baker, Jen. 2021. The Spectral Child. In Palgrave Gothic Handbook of Steam Age Gothic, Clive Bloom (ed). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 711–728. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beauvais, Clémentine. 2015. The Mighty Child. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Robin. 2011. Racial Innocence: Performing American Childhood and Race from Slavery to Civil Rights. New York & London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Blanco Del Pilar, Maria & Peeren, Esther, eds. 2013. The Spectralities Reader: Ghosts and Haunting in Contemporary Cultural Theory. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Castle, Terry. 1993. The Apparitional Lesbian: Female Homosexuality and Modern Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Nina. 2021. Agency. In Keywords for Children’s Literature, Second Edition. Philip Nel, Lissa Paul & Nina Christensen (eds). New York: New York University.Google Scholar
Coats, Karen. Jackson, Anna. 2008. Uncanny Hauntings, Canny Children. In The Gothic in Children’s Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deszcz-Tryhubczak, Justyna & Jaques, Zoe, eds. 2021. Intergenerational Solidarity in Children’s Literature and Film. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford Smith, Victoria. 2017. Between Generations: Collaborative Authorship in the Golden Age of Children’s Literature. Mississippi: University of Mississippi Press.Google Scholar
Freidman, Lester D. & Kavey, Allison B., eds. 2009. Second Star to the Right: Peter Pan in the Popular Imagination. London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
García-González, Macarena. 2018. Post-representational Cultural Memory for Children in Chile: From La Composición to Bear Story . Children’s Literature in Education 51: 160–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-González, Macarena & Deszcz-Tryhubczak, Justyna. 2020. New Materialist Openings to Children’s Literature Studies. International Research in Children’s Literature 13 (1): 45–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Rivas Fernández, Ana & Corcuera, Alfonso. 2012. Gothic Peter Pan. In Fearful symmetries Riley Olstead & Katherine Bischoping (eds). Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Avery. 1997. Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gubar, Marah. 2009. Artful Dodgers: Reconceiving the Golden Age of Children’s Literature. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. The Hermeneutics of Recuperation: What a Kinship-Model Approach to Children’s Agency Could Do for Children’s Literature and Childhood Studies. Jeunesse, 8 (1): 291–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haynes, Joanna & Karin Murris. 2017. Intra-Generational Education: Imagining a Post-Age Pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(10): 971–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, Sharon Patricia. 2013. Introduction: Raising the Dead. In The Spectralities Reader: Ghosts and Haunting in Contemporary Cultural Theory. Maria Blanco del Pilar & Esther Peeren (eds). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Jackson, Anna. 2019. Gothic Children’s Literature: Wolves in Walls and Clocks in Crocodiles. In The Edinburgh Companion to Gothic and the Arts. David Punter (ed). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Derrida. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. (P. Kamuf, ed. and trans). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaques, Zoe. 2015. Children’s Literature and the Posthuman: Animal, Environment, Cyborg. New York & London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavey, Allison B. 2009. Introduction: From Peanut Butter Jars to the Silver Screen. In In Second Star to the Right: Peter Pan in the Popular Imagination. Kavey (eds). Lester D. Friedman Allison Kavey (ed). London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kraftl, Peter. 2020. After Childhood: Re-thinking Environment, Materiality and Media in Children’s Lives. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lesnik-Oberstein, Karen. 2004. Children’s Literature: New Approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2019. The Case of The Case of Peter Pan or the Impossibility of Children’s Fiction: Deconstruction, Psychoanalysis, Childhood, Animality. Oxford Literary Review. 41 (2): 238–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolajeva, Maria. 2009. Power, Voice and Subjectivity in Literature for Young Readers. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Picturebooks and Emotional Literacy. The Reading Teacher, 67 (4): 249–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Afterword: The Case of the Evil (Step)mother, or the Impossibility of Intergenerational Solidarity. In Intergenerational Solidarity in Children’s Literature and Film. Justyna Deszcz-Tryhubczak & Zoe Jaques (eds). Jackson: University Press of Mississippi Press.Google Scholar
Nodelman, Perry. 1992. The Other: Orientalism, and Children’s Literature. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 17 (1): 29–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peeren, Esther. 2014. The Spectral Metaphor. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Specters. In Symptoms of the Planetary Condition: A Critical Vocabulary, Mercedes Bunz, Birgit Mara Kai & Kathrin Thiele (eds), 167–171. Lüneeburg: Meson Press.
Rose, Jacqueline. 1984. The Case of Peter Pan, Or, The Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudd, David. 2020. The Theory Wars Revisited: Rose and the Reading Critics vs. the Liberal Humanists. The Lion and the Unicorn, 44 (1): 89–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Eppler, Karen. 2005. Dependent States: The Child’s Part in Nineteenth-Century American Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2013. Ghostwriting. In The Spectralities Reader: Ghosts and Haunting in Contemporary Cultural Theory. Maria Blanco del Pilar & Esther Peeren (eds). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Spyrou, Spyros. 2017. Time to Decenter Childhood?. Childhood 24 (4): 433–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockton, Kathryn Bond. 2009. The Queer Child, Or Growing Sideways in the Twentieth Century. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stoddard Holmes, Martha. 2009. Peter Pan and the Possibilities of Children’s Literature. Freidman. In Second Star to the Right: Peter Pan in the Popular Imagination. Lester D. Friedman & Allison Kavey (eds). London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Thurschwell, Pamela. 2010. The Ghost Worlds of Modern Adolescence. In Popular Ghosts: The Haunted Spaces of Everyday Culture. Maria Pilar del Blanco & Esther Pereen (eds). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ulanowicz, Anastasia. 2013. Second-Generation Memory and Contemporary Children’s Literature: Ghost Images. Oxford: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vallone, Lynne. 2007. Uncanny Visitors: The Child Ghost in “Haunted” Children’s Literature. In Stories for Children, Histories of Childhood. Volume II: Literature. Rosie Findlay & Sébastien Salbyre (eds). Tours: Presses Universitaires François-Rabelais. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfreys, Julian. 2002. Victorian Hauntings: Spectrality, Gothic, the Uncanny and Literature. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Russumanno, Paolo
2024. Childhood Entanglements, Artifacts, and Inheritances. Journal of Childhood Studies ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.