Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 8:2 (2017) ► pp.137–173

A crosslinguistic study of some extended uses of what-based interrogative expressions in Chinese, English, and Korean

| University of California, Los Angeles
| University of Arkansas
| University of California, Los Angeles
Interrogative pronouns such as what in English, shenme in Mandarin Chinese, and mwe/mwusun in Korean all have developed extended uses beyond interrogation. Such uses may include filling a gap in conversation, softening a speaker’s epistemic stance, and indicating strong emotions such as surprises or incredulity. Yet there is little research dealing with crosslinguistic patterns with large corpora of interactive discourse data. In this paper, we investigate the extended uses based on corpora of multiple telephone calls from the three languages. We show that eight categories of extended use can be identified in the corpora and that most of the extended uses tend to fall in the negative territory. We provide a pragmatic interactive account for this phenomenon and hope that the taxonomy and coding scheme developed here can serve as a starting point for future crosslinguistic and corpus-based comparative studies of what-like tokens as well as of the discourse pragmatic uses of other interrogative forms.
Keywords: interrogative pronoun, what , shenme , mwe , mwusun
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of relevant research
    • 2.1General and English studies
    • 2.2Mandarin-based studies
    • 2.3Korean studies
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Identifying non-interrogative uses and related issues
  • 4.The functional coding categories
    • 4.1Defining the categories (with Mandarin and Korean data as illustrations)
      • 4.1.1Generic
      • 4.1.2Indefiniteness
      • 4.1.3Disapproval
      • 4.1.4General extender
      • 4.1.5Fillers
      • 4.1.6Exclamation
      • 4.1.7Softener
      • 4.1.8Avoidance
    • 4.2Applying the categories to the English data
    • 4.3Summary
  • 5.Findings
    • 5.1Overall findings
    • 5.2Subcategories of extended uses
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Chinese/Korean vs. English
    • 6.2Chinese/English vs. Korean
    • 6.3Shared properties among all three languages
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 January 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00001.lee
References (59)
References
Biq, Yung-O. 1990. Question words as hedges in conversational Chinese: A Q and R exercise. In Lawrence B. Bouton and Yamuna Kachru eds., Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series vol. 11, 141–157. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Blake, Norman F. 1992. Why and what in Shakespeare. In Toshiyuki Takamiya and Richard Beadle, eds., Chaucer to Shakespeare: Essays in Honour of Shinsuke Ando, 179–93. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canavan, Alexandra and George Zipperlen. 1996a. CALLFRIEND Mandarin Chinese-Mainland Dialect. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
. 1996b. CALLFRIEND Korean. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Cha, Jihyeon. 2010. Interaction of prosody and discourse function: Based on the Korean discourse marker mwe in the sentence-final position. Language Facts and Perspectives 251, 227–256.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuan Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. and D. Davy. 1975. Advanced Conversational English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ding, Shengshu, Shuxiang Lyu, Rong Li, Dexuan Sun, Xiechu Guan, Qian Fu, Shengzhang Huang, and Zhiwen Chen. 1961. Xiandai Hanyu Yufa Jianghua [A referential grammar of modern Chinese], Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blythe, J., and Dirksmeyer, T. 2014. Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in pragmatic typology. Studies in Language 38(1), 5–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M. and N. J. Enfield. 2015. Other-initiated repair across languages: towards a typology of conversational structures. Open Linguistics 11, 96–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1997. ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), 69–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2003. The definition of what-d’you-call-it: semantics and pragmatics of recognitional deixis. Journal of Pragmatics 35(1), 101–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J., Dingemanse, M., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Brown, P., Dirksmeyer, T., Drew, P., Floyd, S., Gipper, S., Gisladottir, R. S., Hoymann, G., Kendrick, K. H., Levinson, S. C., Magyari, L., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., San Roque, L., & Torreira, F. 2013. Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell, eds., Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, 343–380. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, J., E. Holliman, and J. McDaniel. 1992. SWITCHBOARD: A telephone speech corpus for research and development. Proc. ICASSP, 517–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas, ed., Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York, Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell. 2013. Conversational repair and human understanding: An introduction. In Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, eds., Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, 1–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2006. The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on language and social interaction 45(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Fuhui. 2005. The use of shenme in interaction, Tatung Journal of General Education, 11, 207–222.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List-construction as a task and a resource. In George Psathas, ed. Interaction competence, 63–92. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kim, Chung-Hyo. 2000. Kwuke-ui uimwunsa-wa pwucengsa yenkwu [A study on interrogative and indefinite words in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Pakiceng.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1993. Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation as interactional resources. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 31, 3–18. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
. 1999. Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation: Types and functions. Discourse and Cognition, 61, 141–168.Google Scholar
Kim, Myung-Hee. 2005. Kwuke uimwunsa-ui tamhwa pyoci-hwa [Pragmaticalization of interrogative words in Korean]. Tamhwa-wa Inci 12(2), 41–62.Google Scholar
. 2006. Kwuke uymwunsa ‘mwusun’uy tamhwa pyoci kinung [Discourse functions of wh-word mwusun ]. Tamhwa-wa Inci 13(2), 21–42.Google Scholar
Koo, Hyun Jung and Rhee, Seongha. 2013. On an emerging paradigm of sentence-final particles of discontent: A grammaticalization perspective. Language Sciences 371, 70–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Ae. 2002. Kwuke hwayongpyoci-ui yenkwu [Research on pragmatic marker in Korean]. Seoul, Korea: Welin.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. 1994. Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13(1), 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Audrey Y-H. 1992. Indefinite what in Mandarin Chinese, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1(2), 125–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lu, Jianming. 1986. Zhoubianxing zhuyuju ji qita [Sentences with inclusive subjects], Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of The Chinese Language] 192(3): 161–167.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1982. Zhongguo Wenfa Yaolue [Essentials of Chinese grammar], Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Jindai Hanyu Zhidaici [Modern Chinese pronouns], Shanghai, Xuelin Chubanshe [Academia Press].Google Scholar
Nam, Kilim and Cha, Jihyeon. 2010. Usage patterns and functions of discourse marker mwo . Hangul 2881, 91–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, M. 1999. Whales, Candlelight and Stuff like that: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005. and stuff und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics 371, 1845–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, M. and G. Yule. 1997. On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics 251, 250–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolf, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23.31:499–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1986. Discourse markers [Studies in interactional sociolinguistics, 5]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 1996. Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: the case of so-called "astonished" questions in repair initiation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Margret Selting, eds., Prosody in conversation : interactional studies, 231–270. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shao, Jingmin and Xiufeng Zhao. 1989. Shenme fei yiwen yongfa yanjiu [A student on the non-interrogative usage of shenme], Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 11: 26–40.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. The search for units of meaning. Textus: English Studies in Italy 91, 75–106.Google Scholar
Song, Zuoyan and Hongyin Tao. 2009. A unified account of causal clause sequences in Mandarin Chinese and its implications. Studies in Language 33(1), 69–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Tingchi. 1981. Guoyu yiwenju de yanjiu [A study on Mandarin Chinese interrogative sentences], Shida Xuebao [The Journal of National Taiwan Normal University] 261:219–277.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Working with Spoken Chinese. Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research (CALPER) Publications, Pennsylvania State University. State College, PA.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Winfred Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, eds., Perspectives on historical linguistics, 245–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 571, 33–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, eds., Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Haifeng and Tieli Wang. 2003. Ziran kouyu zhong shenme de huayu fenxi [Discourse analysis to shenme in spoken conversation], Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 21: 21–29.Google Scholar
Zhou, Rong. 2007. Yiwen daici shenme ge yongfa zhijian de guanxi xintan [Relations among different uses of interrogative pronoun shenme ], Yuwen Xuekan [Journal of Language and Literature Studies] 141, 120–123.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on grammar], Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Chor, Winnie & Marvin Lam
2023. “It can do me1 (‘what’)?” — On the development of a Cantonese interrogative pronoun into a negative stance marker. Journal of Pragmatics 203 ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Kun & Jing Chen
2023. The son (érzi) is not really a son. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:1 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Yap, Foong Ha, Abhishek Kumar Kashyap & Hongyin Tao
2023. Interrogatives and speaker stance: From information-seeking to interpersonal (dis)affiliation. Journal of Pragmatics 205 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja
2022. Assertive content questions in Yurakaré conversations: Using indisputable facts to justify disputable claims, actions, and stances. Journal of Pragmatics 202 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Heeju & Sung-Ock Sohn
2022. From interrogative to disaffiliative stance marker: An analysis of mwusun ‘what’ in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 198 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Nagaya, Naonori
2022. Beyond questions: Non-interrogative uses of ano ‘what’ in Tagalog. Journal of Pragmatics 190 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Seraku, Tohru
2022. Referring to arbitrary entities with placeholders. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:3 ► pp. 426 ff. DOI logo
Seraku, Tohru, Sooyun Park & Yile Yu
2022. Grammatically unstable placeholders and morpho-syntactic remedies: evidence from East Asian languages. Folia Linguistica 56:2 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Wei
2022. The research and implementation feasibility analysis of an intelligent robot for simulating navigational English dialogue under the background of artificial intelligence. Computer Science and Information Systems 19:3 ► pp. 1533 ff. DOI logo
Tanangkingsing, Michael
2022. Pragmatic functions of versatile unsa ‘what’ in Cebuano: From interrogative pronoun to placeholder to stance marker. Journal of Pragmatics 193 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Rouhua
2022. Evaluation Model of English–Chinese Cross-Language Initiation Oral Teaching Based on SOFMNN. In Innovative Computing [Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 791], ► pp. 879 ff. DOI logo
Yap, Foong Ha & Huiling Xu
2022. Indefiniteness, interrogativity, and speaker stance: Insights from the extended uses of ‘what’-words in Chaozhou. Journal of Pragmatics 200 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Wei
2021. The question-response system in Mandarin conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:4 ► pp. 589 ff. DOI logo
Dong, Yang, Yi Tang, Bonnie Wing-Yin Chow, Weisha Wang & Wei-Yang Dong
2020. Contribution of Vocabulary Knowledge to Reading Comprehension Among Chinese Students: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Hsieh, Chen-Yu Chester
2019. Linguistic typology, language modality, and stuff like that. Studies in Language 43:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.