Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 11:1 (2020) ► pp.31–54

Little cutie one piece

An innovative human classifier and its social indexicality in Chinese digital culture

| University of Oregon
| University of Oregon
This study investigates emerging usages in Chinese cyberspace of the numeral classifier méi that violate syntactic and semantic conventions of canonical grammar of modern Chinese. We treat these usages as constructional variants of the canonical classifier construction and show how they afford users of Weibo a device of social indexicality in the sense of Silverstein (1976, 1985, 2003) and Eckert (2000, 2003, 2008). We argue that the constructional variants facilitate the creation of a cute, chic, playful, humorous, and youthful online style and that its popularity draws on multiple indexical resources including contrast to canonical grammar, contemporary language contact with Japanese, influence of the cuteness culture and its commodification, and consumerism in the digital economy. This study contributes to research on the linguistic construction of identity and style, linguistic creativity in the new media and digital culture, and usage-based constructionist approaches to language.
Keywords: social indexicality, variation, digital culture, usage-based constructionist approach
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Linguistic variation and social indexicality
    • 1.2Chinese classifier constructions
    • 1.3 枚 méi: A brief history
  • 2.Data and methods
    • 2.1The Weibo blogpost dataset
    • 2.2Corpus data analysis methods
    • 2.3Survey on language user perceptions
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Productivity
    • 3.2Head noun semantics
    • 3.3Language user perceptions
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations used in this article
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 3 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00023.shi
References (82)
References
Ahrens, Kathleen. 1994. Classifier production in normals and aphasics. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 221, 203–247.Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, H. and S. Pfänder (Eds.). 2016. Experience counts: Frequency effects in language, Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, B. 2004. Laughter and literature: A play theory of humor. Philosophy and Literature, 28(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. K. & Goldberg, A. E. 2012. Young children fail to fully generalize a novel argument structure constuction when exposed to the same input as older learners. Journal of Child Language, 39(3), 457–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten. 2011. The Cool-kawaii Afro-Japanese aesthetics and New World modernity. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. 2009. From stance to style: Gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. 2009. Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, M. K. M. 2000. Sentence-final particles in Cantonese: A gender-linked survey and study, 87–101. Cambridge: East Asian Language Programs, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, F. 陈绂. 2002. 从 “枚”与 “个” 看汉语泛指性量词的演变 [The development of Chinese general classifiers: Perspectives from mei and ge]. 语文研究 [Yuwen Yanjiu], Linguistic Research 11, 33–35.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. L.-S., & Sybesma, R. 1998. Yi-wan tang and yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and mass-classifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 28(3), 385–412.Google Scholar
Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2002. Contemporary Chinese Dictionary (Chinese-English Bilingual Edition). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Chuang, Y. C. 2011. Kawaii in Taiwan politics. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 7(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
Clark, M. 1987. Humor and Incongruity. In J. Morreall (Ed.), The philosophy of laughter and humor, 139–155. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. 2007. Style language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Simon. 2016. How has social media changed language? $ocialnomics, October 27, 2016. [URL]
Eckert, P. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
2003. The meaning of style. Texas Linguistic Forum, 471, 41–53.Google Scholar
2008. Variation and the indexical field 1. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erbaugh, M. S. 2013. Classifier choices in discourse across the seven main Chinese dialects. In Increased empiricism: Recent advances in Chinese linguistics, 101–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gao, Helen. 2019. ‘Little Fresh Meat’ and the Changing Face of Masculinity in China. The New York Times, June 12, 2019. [URL]
Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2019. Explain me this. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. 2012. Frequencies, probabilities and association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics: Some necessary clarifications. Studies in Language, 11(3), 477–510.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, H. D., Murphy, G. L., & Rehder, B. 2008. Prior knowledge and exemplar frequency. Memory and Cognition, 36(7), 1335–1350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42(1), 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hebdige, D. 1984. Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hjorth, Larissa. 2005. Odours of mobility: Mobile phones and Japanese cute culture in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of Intercultural Studies 26(1–2), 39–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J., & Gal, S. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. 2009. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 11, 402–434. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Hsieh, S. 2019. Chinese neologisms. In C.-R. Huang, Z. Jing-Schmidt, & B. Meisterernst (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Chinese applied linguistics, 514–534. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Peng, X. 2018. The sluttified sex: Verbal misogyny reflects and reinforces gender order in wireless China. Language in Society, 47(3), 385–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel, and James H. Martin. 2009. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Speech Recognition, and Computational Linguistics. 2nd edition. NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kapatsinski, V. 2014. What is grammar like? A usage-based constructionist perspective. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 11(1), 1–41.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu & Ken-Ichi Takami. 1993. Grammar and discourse principles: Functional syntax and GB Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, J. Y., & Sera, M. D. 2009. Classifier effects on human categorization: The role of shape classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 18(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 1967. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, S. A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, J. 李建平, & Zhang, X. 张显成. 2009. 泛指性量词 “枚/个” 的兴替及其动因——以出土文献为新材料 [The generalization of the general classifiers “mei/ge” and their motivations – New evidence from the unearthed literatures]. Research in Ancient Chinese Language, 41, 64–72.Google Scholar
Loke, K. 1997. The grammaticalisation and regrammaticalisation of Chinese numeral classifier morphemes. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 25(1), 1-20.Google Scholar
Lukacs, Gabriella. 2015. The labor of cute: Net idols, cute culture, and the digital economy in contemporary Japan. Positions, 23(3), 487–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madlener, K. 2016. Input optimization. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience counts: Frequency effects in language, 133–173. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Makino, S., & Tsutsui, M. 1986. A dictionary of basic Japanese grammar = Nihongo kihon bunpō jiten (1st ed.). Tokyo: Japan Times.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, N. 2002. Language and Identity. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie, Schilling-Estes, 475–499. MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morreall, J. 1987. The Philosophy of laughter and humor. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2009. Humor as cognitive play. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 241–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nosofsky, R. M. 1988. Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 54–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osherson, Daniel N., Edward E. Smith, Ormond Wilkie, Alejandro López, and Eldar Shafir. 1990. Category-Based Induction. Psychological Review 97(2), 185–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y., & Kádár, D. Z. 2013. Politeness in historical and contemporary Chinese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 14(1), 150–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, A. 1998a. On the history of classifiers in archaic and medieval Chinese. In B. T’sou (Ed.), Studia Linguistica Sinica, 39–68. Hong Kong City University.Google Scholar
1998b. On word order in Archaic Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale, 26(1), 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qiu, Z. 2013. Cuteness as a subtle strategy: Urban female youth and the online feizhuliu culture in contemporary China. Cultural Studies, 27(2), 225–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapoza, K. 2011. China’s Weibos vs US’s Twitter: And the winner is? Forbes, (4 August 2011).Google Scholar
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. H. Basso & S. Henry (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology, 11–55. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
1985. Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In E. Mertz & R. J. Parmentier (Eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives, 219–259. Orlando: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23(3), 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C. 2011. It’s not Just the “Heavy NP”: Relative Phrase Length Modulates the Production of Heavy-NP Shift. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 401, 177–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, C. 2006. Chinese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, J. H.-Y. 1994. Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In Ed. by Matthew Chen and Ovid Tseng. In Honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change, 479–494.Google Scholar
Tang, C. C. J. 1996. ‘Ta mai-le bi shizhi’ and Chinese Phrase Structure. 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊, Journal of Institute of Historical Linguistics, Academia Sinica, 445–502.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 2002. Sociolinguistic variation and change. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P., Trudgill, P. of S. P., & Stephen, T. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2012. The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Li, & Tang, Z. 1931. 王力古漢語字典 The Wang Li Character Dictionary of Ancient Chinese. Retrieved from [URL]
Wang, Lianqing. 1994. Origin and Development of Classifiers in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation of the Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Waugh, L. R., & Lafford, B. A. 2006. Markedness. In R. E. Asher and J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd ed., 419–498. New York: Pergamon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W. 1969. A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wong, A., & Zhang, Q. 2000. The linguistic construction of the Tóngzhì community. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 10(2), 248–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wonnacott, E., Boyd, J. K., Thomson, J. & Goldberg, A. E. 2012. Input effects on the acquisition of a novel phrasal construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 661, 458–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xie, B. 谢冰凌. 2013. 量词 “枚” 古义复活现象浅析 [Analysis of classifier mei’s archaic meaning resurrection]. Xiandai Jiaoji (Modern Communication), 61, 72–73.Google Scholar
Yomota, Inuhiko. 2006. “Kawaii” Ron. Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho (Chikuma Shobō).Google Scholar
Yuan, J. 袁静. 2019. 浅析量词 “枚” 的形成及其认知语义特点 [An analysis of the formation of the classifier mei and its cognitive and semantic features]. Journal of Suihua University, 39(2), 91–93.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. 张大雁. 2017. 从 “帅哥一枚” 看量词 “枚” [Analysis on classifier mei from “handsome guy one mei”]. Xiandai Yuwen (Modern Chinese), 21, 126–127.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. 2005. A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society, 34(3), 431–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W. 张万起. 1998. 量词 “枚” 的产生及其历史演变 [The formation of classifier "mei" and its historical evolution]. Zhongguo Yuwen (Chinese Language), 31, 208-217.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Hsu, Chan-Chia
2025. Further semantic change of the derogatory sociomorpheme tái in Chinese gender-related Internet neologisms. Language Sciences 107 ► pp. 101686 ff. DOI logo
Lang, Jun, Zhuo Jing-Schmidt & Tinggui Chen
2024. The blurry lines between popular media and party propaganda: China’s convergence culture through a linguistic lens. PLOS ONE 19:1 ► pp. e0297499 ff. DOI logo
Teo, Ming Chew & Jingxia Lin
2024. Creating individual styles through discourse variation in Singapore Mandarin. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal DOI logo
Lang, Jun
2020. Neological cancer metaphors in the Chinese cyberspace. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:2 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Ying, Lu & Jan Blommaert
2020. Understanding memes on Chinese social media. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:2 ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.