Little cutie one piece
An innovative human classifier and its social indexicality in Chinese digital culture
This study investigates emerging usages in Chinese cyberspace of the numeral classifier
méi that
violate syntactic and semantic conventions of canonical grammar of modern Chinese. We treat these usages as constructional
variants of the canonical classifier construction and show how they afford users of Weibo a device of social indexicality in the
sense of Silverstein (
1976,
1985,
2003) and Eckert (
2000,
2003,
2008). We argue that the constructional variants facilitate the creation of a cute, chic, playful,
humorous, and youthful online style and that its popularity draws on multiple indexical resources including contrast to canonical
grammar, contemporary language contact with Japanese, influence of the cuteness culture and its commodification, and consumerism
in the digital economy. This study contributes to research on the linguistic construction of identity and style, linguistic
creativity in the new media and digital culture, and usage-based constructionist approaches to language.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Linguistic variation and social indexicality
- 1.2Chinese classifier constructions
- 1.3
枚
méi: A brief history
- 2.Data and methods
- 2.1The Weibo blogpost dataset
- 2.2Corpus data analysis methods
- 2.3Survey on language user perceptions
- 3.Results
- 3.1Productivity
- 3.2Head noun semantics
- 3.3Language user perceptions
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations used in this article
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References (82)
References
Ahrens, Kathleen. 1994. Classifier production in normals and aphasics. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 221, 203–247.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Behrens, H. and S. Pfänder (Eds.). 2016. Experience counts: Frequency effects in language, Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boyd, B. 2004. Laughter and literature: A play theory of humor. Philosophy and Literature, 28(1), 1–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boyd, J. K. & Goldberg, A. E. 2012. Young children fail to fully generalize a novel argument structure constuction when exposed to the same input as older learners. Journal of Child Language, 39(3), 457–481. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten. 2011. The Cool-kawaii Afro-Japanese aesthetics and New World modernity. Lanham, MD: Lexington.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bucholtz, M. 2009. From stance to style: Gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford Scholarship Online. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–455. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Castells, M. 2009. Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chan, M. K. M. 2000. Sentence-final particles in Cantonese: A gender-linked survey and study, 87–101. Cambridge: East Asian Language Programs, Harvard University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chao, Y. R. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, F. 陈绂. 2002. 从 “枚”与 “个” 看汉语泛指性量词的演变 [The development of Chinese general classifiers: Perspectives from mei and ge]. 语文研究 [Yuwen Yanjiu], Linguistic Research 11, 33–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, L. L.-S., & Sybesma, R. 1998. Yi-wan tang and yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and mass-classifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 28(3), 385–412.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2002. Contemporary Chinese Dictionary (Chinese-English Bilingual Edition). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chuang, Y. C. 2011. Kawaii in Taiwan politics. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 7(3), 1–16.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, M. 1987. Humor and Incongruity. In J. Morreall (Ed.), The philosophy of laughter and humor, 139–155. Albany: State University of New York Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coupland, N. 2007. Style language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, Simon. 2016. How has social media changed language? $ocialnomics, October 27, 2016. [URL]
Eckert, P. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, P. 2003. The meaning of style. Texas Linguistic Forum, 471, 41–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, P. 2008. Variation and the indexical field 1. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gao, Helen. 2019. ‘Little Fresh Meat’ and the Changing Face of Masculinity in China. The New York Times, June 12, 2019. [URL]
Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E. 2019. Explain me this. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S. Th. 2012. Frequencies, probabilities and association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics: Some necessary clarifications. Studies in Language, 11(3), 477–510.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gu, Y. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237–257. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, H. D., Murphy, G. L., & Rehder, B. 2008. Prior knowledge and exemplar frequency. Memory and Cognition, 36(7), 1335–1350. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, M. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42(1), 25–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hebdige, D. 1984. Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Methuen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hjorth, Larissa. 2005. Odours of mobility: Mobile phones and Japanese cute culture in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of Intercultural Studies 26(1–2), 39–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irvine, J., & Gal, S. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. 2009. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 11, 402–434. Amsterdam: Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Hsieh, S. 2019. Chinese neologisms. In C.-R. Huang, Z. Jing-Schmidt, & B. Meisterernst (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Chinese applied linguistics, 514–534. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Peng, X. 2018. The sluttified sex: Verbal misogyny reflects and reinforces gender order in wireless China. Language in Society, 47(3), 385–408. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jurafsky, Daniel, and James H. Martin. 2009. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Speech Recognition, and Computational Linguistics. 2nd edition. NJ: Prentice-Hall.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kapatsinski, V. 2014. What is grammar like? A usage-based constructionist perspective. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 11(1), 1–41.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuno, Susumu & Ken-Ichi Takami. 1993. Grammar and discourse principles: Functional syntax and GB Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuo, J. Y., & Sera, M. D. 2009. Classifier effects on human categorization: The role of shape classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 18(1), 1–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. 1967. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, S. A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, J. 李建平, & Zhang, X. 张显成. 2009. 泛指性量词 “枚/个” 的兴替及其动因——以出土文献为新材料 [The generalization of the general classifiers “mei/ge” and their motivations – New evidence from the unearthed literatures]. Research in Ancient Chinese Language, 41, 64–72.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loke, K. 1997. The grammaticalisation and regrammaticalisation of Chinese numeral classifier morphemes. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 25(1), 1-20.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lukacs, Gabriella. 2015. The labor of cute: Net idols, cute culture, and the digital economy in contemporary Japan. Positions, 23(3), 487–513. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Madlener, K. 2016. Input optimization. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience counts: Frequency effects in language, 133–173. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Makino, S., & Tsutsui, M. 1986. A dictionary of basic Japanese grammar = Nihongo kihon bunpō jiten (1st ed.). Tokyo: Japan Times.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mendoza-Denton, N. 2002. Language and Identity. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie, Schilling-Estes, 475–499. MA: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morreall, J. 1987. The Philosophy of laughter and humor. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morreall, J. 2009. Humor as cognitive play. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 241–260. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nosofsky, R. M. 1988. Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 54–65. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osherson, Daniel N., Edward E. Smith, Ormond Wilkie, Alejandro López, and Eldar Shafir. 1990. Category-Based Induction. Psychological Review 97(2), 185–200. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peyraube, A. 1998a. On the history of classifiers in archaic and medieval Chinese. In B. T’sou (Ed.), Studia Linguistica Sinica, 39–68. Hong Kong City University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peyraube, A. 1998b. On word order in Archaic Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale, 26(1), 3–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Qiu, Z. 2013. Cuteness as a subtle strategy: Urban female youth and the online feizhuliu culture in contemporary China. Cultural Studies, 27(2), 225–241. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rapoza, K. 2011. China’s Weibos vs US’s Twitter: And the winner is? Forbes, (4 August 2011).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, M. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. H. Basso & S. Henry (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology, 11–55. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, M. 1985. Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In E. Mertz & R. J. Parmentier (Eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives, 219–259. Orlando: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23(3), 193–229. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C. 2011. It’s not Just the “Heavy NP”: Relative Phrase Length Modulates the Production of Heavy-NP Shift. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 401, 177–187. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, C. 2006. Chinese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tai, J. H.-Y. 1994. Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In Ed. by Matthew Chen and Ovid Tseng. In Honor of Professor William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change, 479–494.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tang, C. C. J. 1996. ‘Ta mai-le bi shizhi’ and Chinese Phrase Structure. 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊, Journal of Institute of Historical Linguistics, Academia Sinica, 445–502.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trudgill, P. 2002. Sociolinguistic variation and change. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trudgill, P., Trudgill, P. of S. P., & Stephen, T. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, John R. 2012. The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. NY: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Li, & Tang, Z. 1931. 王力古漢語字典 The Wang Li Character Dictionary of Ancient Chinese. Retrieved from [URL]
Wang, Lianqing. 1994. Origin and Development of Classifiers in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation of the Ohio State University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waugh, L. R., & Lafford, B. A. 2006. Markedness. In R. E. Asher and J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd ed., 419–498. New York: Pergamon. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolfram, W. 1969. A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wong, A., & Zhang, Q. 2000. The linguistic construction of the Tóngzhì community. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 10(2), 248–278. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wonnacott, E., Boyd, J. K., Thomson, J. & Goldberg, A. E. 2012. Input effects on the acquisition of a novel phrasal construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 661, 458–478. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xie, B. 谢冰凌. 2013. 量词 “枚” 古义复活现象浅析 [Analysis of classifier mei’s archaic meaning resurrection]. Xiandai Jiaoji (Modern Communication), 61, 72–73.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yomota, Inuhiko. 2006. “Kawaii” Ron. Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho (Chikuma Shobō).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yuan, J. 袁静. 2019. 浅析量词 “枚” 的形成及其认知语义特点 [An analysis of the formation of the classifier mei and its cognitive and semantic features]. Journal of Suihua University, 39(2), 91–93.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, D. 张大雁. 2017. 从 “帅哥一枚” 看量词 “枚” [Analysis on classifier mei from “handsome guy one mei”]. Xiandai Yuwen (Modern Chinese), 21, 126–127.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Q. 2005. A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society, 34(3), 431–466. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, W. 张万起. 1998. 量词 “枚” 的产生及其历史演变 [The formation of classifier "mei" and its historical evolution]. Zhongguo Yuwen (Chinese Language), 31, 208-217.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Lang, Jun, Zhuo Jing-Schmidt & Tinggui Chen
2024.
The blurry lines between popular media and party propaganda: China’s convergence culture through a linguistic lens.
PLOS ONE 19:1
► pp. e0297499 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.