Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 10:1 (2019) ► pp.36–60

Devices of alignment

Suoyi- and Danshi-prefaced questions in Mandarin Chinese TV news interviews

| Shenzhen University
This study draws on a conversational analysis (CA)-oriented micro-analytical approach and examines the form, placement and function of interviewer (IR) questions prefaced by turn-initial 所以 suoyi ‘so’ and 但(是) dan(shi) ‘but’ in Chinese TV news interviews. It is found that IRs often employ the resultative connective suoyi as the first item of their turn immediately after a question-answer (QA) sequence. They do so to preface a declarative, alone or followed by a question tag that invokes an interviewee (IE) opinion on, or the gist of, IE prior talk. While such a design can be a device that IRs use to signal the closing of the ongoing topic, the recipient may orient to it as eliciting confirmation or agreement. By contrast, the adversative connective dan(shi) in the turn-initial position prefaces either a wh-question or a yes/no question and brings forth a point of contrast and transition for questioning. As a practice with which IRs re-direct the IE’s response to a previous unaddressed concern with the agenda tightened, the dan(shi)-prefaced questions do not convey opposition or disagreement. Rather, they function to deal with the resumption in a way that renders it unproblematic. I argue that both types of connective-prefaced questions together with the responses they elicit demonstrate a particular kind of alignment between IRs and IEs in Chinese TV news interviews.
Keywords: question design, connective, interaction, Chinese TV news interview
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1CA studies on question-answer organization and question design in news interviews
    • 2.2CA studies on connectives and connective-prefaced questions
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1IR questions prefaced by suoyi
    • 4.2IR questions prefaced by dan(shi)
  • 5.Discussion and concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.18013.gao
References (38)
References
Bolden, G. B. (2006). Little words that matter: discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction, Journal of Communication, 561: 661–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) “So what’s up?”: Using the discourse marker so to launch conversational business, Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (3): 302–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). ‘Articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk, Discourse Studies, 12 (1): 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: the case of news-interview discourse. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, 163–198. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2010). Questions in broadcast journalism. In A. Freed, & S. Ehrlich (eds.) Why Do You Ask?, 256–278. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. E., Elliott, M. N., Heritage, J., & McDonald, L. L. (2006). Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents 1953–2000. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36 (4), pp. 561–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmertsen, S. (2007). Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews, Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (3): 570–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Mei. (2000). Ziran kouyu zhong ruohua lianci de huayu biaoji gongneng [Reduced conjunctions as discourse markers in natural conversations]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese Language] 51. 459–470.Google Scholar
Gao, Hua. (2005) Hanyu zhong de chenshu yiwenju [On Chinese declarative questions]. In Shao, Jingmin & Luke, K. K. (eds.) Hanyu Yufa Yanjiu de Xin Tuozhan [New Explorations in Chinese Grammatical Research] (Vol. 21), 307–328. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, A. M. (1997). On the systematic deployment of okay and mmhmm in the academic advising sessions. Pragmatics 7 (3): 397–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. van Dijk （ed.）, Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3): Discourse and Dialogue, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2002). Ad hoc inquiries: two preferences in the design of routine questions in an open context.. In D. W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N. C. Schaeffer, & J. V. Zouwen, Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview (pp. 313–333). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
(2003). Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview. In Glenn P., LeBaron C. D. & L. Mandelbaum (eds.), Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper, 57–90. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2010). Questioning in medicine. In A. Freed, & S. Enrlich (eds.) Why Do You Ask?, 20–41. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012). Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge, Research on Language and Social Interaction 451:1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of Pragmatics, 571:331–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Turn-initial particles in English: the cases of oh and well , [URL]
Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: the case of news interviews. In D. Boden, & D. H. Zimmerman (eds.) Talk and Social Structureu: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, 93–137. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. C., & Roth, A. L. (1995). Grammar and institution: question and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28 (1): 1–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 231: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z. (2019). Grammatical constructions and Chinese discourse. In Chris Shei (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis, 102–115. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A. (2002). So …?: pragmatic implications of so-prefaced questions in formal police interviews. In Cotterill, J. (ed.) Language in the Legal Process, 91–110. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Los Angeles and Berkeley: UC Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K. (1999). And-prefaced questions in institutional discourse, Linguistics, 37 (2): 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, H. & Huiskes, M. (2001). Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: its use as a resumption marker. In Selting, M. & E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.) Studies in Interactional Lingustics, 141–169. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. (2011). The accountability interviews, politics, and change in UK public service broadcasting. In Ekstrom, M. and M. Patrona (eds.) Talking Politics in Broadcast Media, 33–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, M. (2006). Making sequentiality sailent: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots. Discourse Studies, 8 (2): 279–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 681: 939–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.) Analyzing Discourse, 71–93. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson, & P. Drew (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, 28–52. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T. & Hayashi, M. (2010). Transformative answers: one way to resist a question’s constraints, Language in Society, 391: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, H. & Thompson, S. A. (1994). The discourse and grammar interface: preferred clause structure in Mandarin conversation. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 29(3): 1–34.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Pragmatic connectives. Journal of Pragmatcs, 31: 447–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Chueh-chen & Huang, Lillian M. (2006). Grammaticalization of connectives in Mandarin Chinese: a corpus-based study. Language and Linguistics, 7 (4): 991–1016.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wang, Xiaoyun
2020. Managing a suspended course of action. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:2 ► pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
Lim, Ni-Eng
2019. Introduction. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 10:2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.