Review published In:
Chinese Language and DiscourseVol. 2:1 (2011) ► pp.131–135
Book review
. Modality in Modern Mandarin. [现代汉语情态研究]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2007. Beijing: The Chinese Social Sciences Publishing House, 2007.
Reviewed by
References (13)
Kratzer, A. 1977. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1), 337–355. 
1978. Semantik der Rede. Konigstein: Scriptor.
1981. The notional category of modality. In H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (eds), Words, Worlds, and Contexts, 38–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.
1986. Conditionals. In A. M. Farley, P. Farley, and K. E. McCollough (eds), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, 115–135. Chicago Linguistics Society.
1991. Modality. In A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 639–650. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 5–38.
1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nuyts, I. 2001a. Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
2001b. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331, 383–400.
Papafragou, A. 2006. Epistemic modality truth conditions. Lingua 1161, 1688–1702.
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A. -M. and K. Aijmer. 2007. The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, E. C. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 651, 31–55.