Review published In:
Chinese Language and DiscourseVol. 2:1 (2011) ► pp.131–135
Book review
. Modality in Modern Mandarin [现代汉语情态研究]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2007. Beijing: The Chinese Social Sciences Publishing House, 2007.
Reviewed by
References
Kratzer, A.
1977 What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1), 337–355. 
1978 Semantik der Rede. Konigstein: Scriptor.
1981 The notional category of modality. In H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (eds), Words, Worlds, and Contexts, 38–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.
1986 Conditionals. In A. M. Farley, P. Farley, and K. E. McCollough (eds), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, 115–135. Chicago Linguistics Society.
1991 Modality. In A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 639–650. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W.
1990 Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 5–38.
1999 Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nuyts, I.
2001b Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331, 383–400.
Papafragou, A.
2006 Epistemic modality truth conditions. Lingua 1161, 1688–1702.
Portner, Paul
2009 Modality. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A. -M. and K. Aijmer
2007 The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, E. C.
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 651, 31–55.