Article published in:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 11:1 (2020) ► pp. 107133


The principle of proportionality


Attardo, Salvatore
2001 “umor and irony in interaction: from mode adoption to failure of detection.” In Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunicatio, ed. by Luigi Anolli, Rita. Ciceri, and Giuseppe. Riva, 166–185. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw
1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert
1994Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canavan, Alexandra, and George Zipperlen
1996CALLFRIEND Mandarin Chinese-Mainland Dialect LDC96S55. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
1996CALLHOME Mandarin Chinese Speech LDC96S34. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 “Joint commitment.” In Using Language, 289–317. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven
1992 “Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse.” In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. by Paul Drew, 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests.” In Requesting in social interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Paul Drew, 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
[ p. 130 ]
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2009 “A sequential approach to affect: The case of ‘disappointment.’” In Talk in interaction – Comparative dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 94–123. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Selting, Margret
2017Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Xiufang
2010 “汉语中表示承诺的言语施为动词. [Performative Verbs that Can Express Commitment in Chinese]” 汉语学习 Hanyu Xuexi (2): 23–30.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1987Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics. 25 (1): 219–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick
2011 “Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: Enchrony, status, knowledge, and agency.” In The morality of knowledge in conversation, ed. by Stivers Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Mei
2017 “负面评价表达的规约化. [On conventionalization of negative assessment expressions]” 中国语文 Zhongguo Yuwen (2): 131–147.Google Scholar
Fish, Karyn, Kathrin Rothermich, and Marc D. Pell
2017 “The sound of (in) sincerity.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 147–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1971Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
1978The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
1979 “Footing.” Semiotica 25 (1–2): 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1979 “The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation.” In Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2017 “Teasing.” In the Routledge handbook of language and humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 204–218. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 48 (1): 41–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto
2013 “Turn allocation and turn sharing.” In The handbook of conversation analysis, ed. by Sidnell Jack, and Tanya Stivers, 167–190, ‎Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Hellbernd, Nele, and Daniela Sammler
2016 “Prosody conveys speaker’s intentions: Acoustic cues for speech act perception.” Journal of Memory and Language 88: 70–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2003 “Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview.” In Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper, ed. by Philip Glenn, Curtis Lebaron, and Jennifer Mandelbaum, 57–90. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2007 “Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference.” In Person reference in interaction: Linguistic, cultural and social perspectives, ed. by Stivers Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Raymond C. Wesley
2016 “Are explicit apologies proportional to the offenses they address?Discourse Processes 53 (1–2): 5–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 131 ]
Heritage, John, Raymond C. Wesley, and Drew, Paul
2019 “Constructing apologies: Reflexive relationships between apologies and offenses.” Journal of Pragmatics 142: 185–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1957 “Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb.” In Selected Writings II, 130–47. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kibble, Rodger
2006 “Speech acts, commitment and multi-agent communication.” Computational & mathematical organization theory 12 (2–3): 127–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail
2008 “From predictions to promises: How to derive deontic commitment.” Pragmatics & Cognition 16 (3): 471–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
2003 “Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation.” Journal of pragmatics, 35 (9): 1387–1411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1984 “Intensity.” In Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 43–70. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, P. L. P., Hai Hua Pan, and Lei Zhang
2013 “Chinese adverbial Quan as a dual-function operator: A domain restrictor and a universal quantifier.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 8 (2): 169–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983 “Pragmatics.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson
1981 “A functional reference grammar of Mandarin Chinese.” Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Local, John, and Gareth Walker
2004 “Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (8): 1375–1403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard
2012 “Making Sense of Outliers.” Phonetica 69: 48–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott
1991The social system. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pell, Marc D., Silke Paulmann, Chinar Dara, Areej Alasseri, and Sonja A. Kotz
2009 “Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages.” Journal of Phonetics 37 (4): 417–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1986 “Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims.” Human studies 9 (2–3): 219–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth
2012Affectivity in Interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975 “Indirect speech acts.” In Speech acts, 59–82. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 “How performatives work.” Linguistics and philosophy 12(5): 535–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
1996 “Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called ‘astonished’.” In Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 231–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 132 ]
Shardakova, Maria
2017 “Politeness, Teasing, and Humor”. In the Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 219–233. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2005 “Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position”. Research on language and social interaction 38 (2): 131–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005 “The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction.” Discourse studies 7 (4–5): 481–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2015Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi, and Yaping Tsai
2005 “Domain restrictions for distributive quantification in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14 (2): 89–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turk, Monica J.
2006 “Projection in Mandarin Chinese conversation: Grammar and social interaction in question-answer sequences.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Walker, Gareth
2010 “The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice.” Prosody in interaction 23: 51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Xinyang
2018 “汉语自然会话中的疑问式回应及其互动功能. [The interrogative form response to questions and its interactional function in Chinese daily conversation].” 语言教学与研究. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies 194(6): 83-92.Google Scholar
2018 “吉林长春: ‘电视问政’有镜头 作风建设不停休. [Jilin Changchun: non-stop effort to rectify officials’ style of work through the lens of ‘Questioning Officials on TV’]”. Retrieved from http://​www​.xinhuanet​.com​/politics​/2018​-01​/25​/c​_1122313561​.htm
Wang, Yu-Fang, Pi-Hua Tsai, and Ya-Ting Yang
2010 “Objectivity, subjectivity and intersubjectivity: Evidence from qishi (‘actually’) and shishishang (‘in fact’) in spoken Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3): 705–727. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Guodong, and Yaxin Wu
2018 “Inviting in Mandarin: Anticipating the likelihood of the success of an invitation.” Journal of Pragmatics 125: 130–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yue, Yao
2016 “从互动交际的视角看让步类同语式评价立场的表达. [Stance-taking of the concessive tautology in Mandarin conversation].” 中国语文. Zhongguo Yuwen (Chinese Language) 370(1): 58–69.Google Scholar