Article In:
Chinese Language and Discourse: Online-First Articles

Perceptual confusion of Mandarin coda nasals in societal bilingualism

ORCID logo | Nanjing University of Science and Technology
 | Nanjing University of Science and Technology
 | Nanjing University of Science and Technology
 | Nanjing University of Science and Technology
 | Nanjing University of Science and Technology
 | Nanjing University of Science and Technology
 | Nanjing University of Science and Technology
The perception of L2 Mandarin coda nasals (-n and -ŋ) by L1 Wuxi Wu (with only -n) and L1 Fuqing Min (with only -ŋ) speakers was investigated. Results of two experiments revealed that the younger generation of both Wuxi and Fuqing speakers identified Mandarin coda nasals more accurately than the middle-aged generation. The high front vowel /i/ correlated with more misidentifications of postvocalic nasals than mid and low vowels but the result was confounded with nasal type and age group. Background noise impacted with the identification of nasal place of articulation but it was also confounded with nasal type and the L1. These findings shed light on the effects of coarticulation, L1 sound system and language contact on the perception and acquisition of L2 sounds in societal bilingualism.
Keywords: coda nasal, perception, L2 Mandarin, Wuxi Wu, Fuqing Min
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Coda nasals in Chinese varieties
    • 1.2Societal bilingualism and second language speech
    • 1.3Perceptual confusion of coda nasals
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Stimuli
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Data Analysis
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusions and implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (67)
References
Baker, Wendy, and Pavel Trofimovich. 2005. “Interaction of Native- and Second-Language Vowel System(s) in Early and Late Bilinguals.” Language and Speech 48 (1): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beddor, Patrice Speeter. 2009. “A Coarticulatory Path to Sound Change.” Language 85 (4): 785–821. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Perception Grammars and Sound Change.” In The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors, edited by Maria-Josep Solé and Daniel Recasens, 3231:37–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo
Best, Catherine T. 1995. “A Direct Realist View of Cross-Language Speech Perception.” In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, edited by Winifred Strange, 171–204. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T., and M. D. Tyler. 2007. “Nonnative and Second-Language Speech Perception.” In Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, edited by Ocke-Schwen Bohn and Murray J. Munro, 13–34. v. 171. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canty, Angelo, Brian Ripley, and Alessandra R. Brazzale. 2024. “Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R Package Version 1.3–30.” 2024. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1928. Studies in the Modern Wu Dialects. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. “Languages and Dialects in China.” In Aspects of Chinese Sociolinguistics, edited by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford, Calif, USA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew. 1972. “Nasals and Nasalization in Chinese: Explorations in Phonological Universals.” Doctoral dissertation, Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. 2015. Exploring tonal effects on the perception of word-final nasals: a preliminary study in Southern Min. The 18th Oriental Chapter of International Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardization of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques, 978–1-4673–8279–3/15 ©2015 IEEE, 155–159.Google Scholar
Chen, Ying, Ya Ping Chen, and Yan Li. 2021. “Coda Nasal Perception in Mandarin by Fuqing Min Speakers.” In Proceedings of 2021 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP2021), 258–61. Singapore. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ying, Ya Ping Chen, Lei Wang, and Jie Cui. 2019. “Vowel Effects on the Perception of Nasal Place of Articulation in Wuxi Wu and Fuqing Min.” In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS2019), 344–48. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Chen, Ying, and Susan Guion-Anderson. 2011. “Perceptual Confusability of Word-Final Nasals in Southern Min and Mandarin: Implications for Coda Nasal Mergers in Chinese.” In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS2011), 464–67. Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
Chen, Ying, V Kapatsinski, and Susan Guion-Anderson. 2012. “Acoustic Cues of Vowel Quality to Coda Nasal Perception in Southern Min.” In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2012), 1412–15. Portland, OR, USA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ying, Yi Xu, and Susan Guion-Anderson. 2015. “Prosodic Realization of Focus in Bilingual Production of Southern Min and Mandarin.” Phonetica 71 (4): 249–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 1985. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York, USA: Basil Blackwell in association with André Deutsch.Google Scholar
DeFrancis, John. 1984. The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Erika Parlato, Sonia Frota, Yuki Hirose, and Sharon Peperkamp. 2011. “Where Do Illusory Vowels Come From?” Journal of Memory and Language 64 (3): 199–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estrella, Alexandra. 2016. “Informational Masking of Multi Talker Babble in English Vowel Identification for Spanish-English Bilinguals.” Master’s thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Feng, Ai Zhen. 1993. Studies in Fuqing Dialect. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1995. “Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, Findings, and Problems.” In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, edited by Winifred Strange, 233–77. Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Language Contact in Bilingualism: Phonetic System Interactions.” In Laboratory Phonology 9, edited by Jennifer Cole and José Ignacio Hualde, 353–81. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2018. “It’s Input That Matters Most, Not Age.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21 (5): 919–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “A Non-Critical Period for Second-Language Learning.” In A Sound Approach to Language Matters: In Honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn, edited by Anne Mette Nyvad, Michaela Hejná, Anders Højen, Anna Bothe Jespersen, and Mette Hjortshøj Sørensen, 501–42. Aahus University Library. [URL].
Flege, James Emil, Katsura Aoyama, and Ocke-Schwen Bohn. 2021. “The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) Applied.” In Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress, edited by Ratree Wayland, 84–118. Cambridge, United Kingdom New York, USA Port Melbourne, Australia New Delhi, India Singapore: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil, and Serena Liu. 2001. “The Effect of Experience on Adults’ Acquisition of a Second Language.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23 (4): 527–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil, and Ian R. A. MacKay. 2004. “Perceiving Vowels in a Second Language.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil, Ian R. A. MacKay, and Diane Meador. 1999. “Native Italian Speakers’ Perception and Production of English Vowels.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (5): 2973–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Carol A., and Mary R. Smith. 1986. “Speech Perception as ‘Vector Analysis’: An Approach to the Problems of Invariance and Segmentation.” In Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, edited by J. S. Perkell and D. H. Klatt, 123–39. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goodin-Mayeda, C. Elizabeth. 2016. Nasals and Nasalization in Spanish and Portuguese: Perception, Phonetics and Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo
Guion, Susan G. 2003. “The Vowel Systems of Quichua-Spanish Bilinguals.” Phonetica 60 (2): 98–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, Susan G., James Emil Flege, Serena H. Liu, and Grace H. Yeni-Komshian. 2000a. “Age of Learning Effects on the Duration of Sentences Produced in a Second Language.” Applied Psycholinguistics 21 (2): 205–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, Susan G., James Emil Flege, and Jonathan D. Loftin. 2000b. “The Effect of L1 Use on Pronunciation in Quichua–Spanish Bilinguals.” Journal of Phonetics 28 (1): 27–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, Gisela, and Doris Aaronson. 2003. “A Longitudinal Study of Chinese Children and Adolescents Learning English in the United States.” Applied Psycholinguistics 24 (1): 131–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, Gisela, Winifred Strange, Yanhong Wu, Julissa Collado, and Qi Guan. 2006. “Perception and Production of English Vowels by Mandarin Speakers: Age-Related Differences Vary with Amount of L2 Exposure.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (2): 1118–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith, Christian T. DiCanio, and Laurel MacKenzie. 2007. “The Acoustic and Visual Phonetic Basis of Place of Articulation in Excrescent Nasals.” UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Reports 3 (3): 529–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, Kyoung-Ho, and Susan G. Guion. 2006. “Phonological Systems in Bilinguals: Age of Learning Effects on the Stop Consonant Systems of Korean-English Bilinguals.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (3): 1672–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K., Barbara T. Conboy, Sharon Coffey-Corina, Denise Padden, Maritza Rivera-Gaxiola, and Tobey Nelson. 2008. “Phonetic Learning as a Pathway to Language: New Data and Native Language Magnet Theory Expanded (NLM-e).” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363 (1493): 979–1000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K., and Paul Iverson. 1995. “Linguistic Experience and the ‘Perceptual Magnet Effect’.” In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, edited by Winifred Strange, 121–54. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Lenth, Russell V. 2021. “Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means. R Package Version 1.6.0.” 2021. [URL].
Liang, Yu Zhang. 1990. “Fuqing Dialect.” Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 23 (2): 84–92.Google Scholar
Liu, Chang, and Su-Hyun Jin. 2015. “Auditory Detection of Non-Speech and Speech Stimuli in Noise: Effects of Listeners’ Native Language Background.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138 (5): 2782–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKay, Ian R.A., Diane Meador, and James Emil Flege. 2001. “The Identification of English Consonants by Native Speakers of Italian.” Phonetica 58 (1–2): 103–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Victor H.. 1991. “What Is a Chinese ‘Dialect/Topolect’? Reflections on Some Key Sino-English Linguistic Terms.” Sino-Platonic Papers 291:1–31.Google Scholar
Miller, George A., and Patricia E. Nicely. 1955. “An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27 (2): 338–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nozawa, Takeshi, and Sang Yee CHEON. 2012. “The Identification of Nasals in a Coda Position by Native Speakers of American English, Korean and Japanese.” Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 16 (2): 5–14.Google Scholar
Nozawa, Takeshi, and Ratree Wayland. 2021. “Effects of the Postvocalic Nasal on the Perception of American English Vowels by Native Speakers of American English and Japanese.” In Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress, edited by Ratree Wayland, 1st ed., 228–46. Cambridge University Press. [URL]. DOI logo
Ohala, John J. 1981. “The Listener as a Source of Sound Change.” In Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, edited by Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrick, and Mary Frances Miller, 178–203. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
2012. “The Listener as a Source of Sound Change: An Update.” In The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors, edited by Maria-Josep Solé and Daniel Recasens, 3231:21–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo
Pan, Wu Yun. 2008. “The Consistency of the Main Levels in the Wu Final System.” Oriental Linguistics 3 (1): 132–37.Google Scholar
Peng, Shu-hui. 1993. “Cross-Language Influence on the Production of Mandarin /f/ and /x/ and Taiwanese /h/ by Native Speakers of Taiwanese Amoy.” Phonetica 50 (4): 245–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piske, Thorsten. 2007. “Implications of James E. Flege’s Research for the Foreign Language Classroom.” In Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, edited by Ocke-Schwen Bohn and Murray J. Munro, 171:301–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo
Piske, Thorsten, Ian R.A. MacKay, and James E. Flege. 2001. “Factors Affecting Degree of Foreign Accent in an L2: A Review.” Journal of Phonetics 29 (2): 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qian, Nai Rong. 1992. Studies in the Contemporary Wu Dialects. Shanghai Educational Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2023. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.” Vienna, Austria. [URL].
Redford, Melissa Annette. 1999. “An Articulatory Basis for the Syllable.” Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 1992. “Phonetic and Phonological Processes: The Case of Nasalization.” Language and Speech 35 (1–2): 29–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Han Ren. 1994. Documentation of Wuxi County. Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Tao, Sha, Yingyue Chen, Wenjing Wang, Qi Dong, Su-Hyun Jin, and Chang Liu. 2018. “English Consonant Identification in Multi-Talker Babble: Effects of Chinese-Native Listeners’ English Experience.” Language and Speech 62 (3): 531–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Second edition. Switzerland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Richard A. 2001. “Perceptual Cues in Contrast Maintenance.” In The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology, edited by Elizabeth V. Hume and Keith Johnson, 251–77. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI logo
Yao, Yao, and Charles B. Chang. 2016. “On the Cognitive Basis of Contact-Induced Sound Change: Vowel Merger Reversal in Shanghainese.” Language 92 (2): 433–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zee, Eric. 1981. “Effect of Vowel Quality on Perception of Post–Vocalic Nasal Consonants in Noise.” Journal of Phonetics 9 (1): 35–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985. “Sound Change in Syllable-Final Nasal Consonants in Chinese.” Journal of Chinese Linguistic 13 (2): 291–330.Google Scholar
Zhong, Ling, Chang Liu, and Sha Tao. 2019. “Sentence Recognition for Native and Non-Native English Listeners in Quiet and Babble: Effects of Contextual Cues.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145 (4): EL297–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhuang, Shen. 1995. Documentation of Wuxi City. Jiangsu People’s Publishing.Google Scholar