Comparing classifier use in 1995 and 2010 early child Cantonese to explore social change in Hong Kong
This study compared and analysed the classifier usage in two cohorts: the 492 Cantonese-speaking young children tested in 1995 (Tse & Li, 2011), and the 143 children tested in 2010 (Li &Tse, 2011). The results indicated that: (1) the 1995 and 2010 cohorts shared the same 8 most commonly used classifiers, 個 go3, 隻 zek3, 架 gaa3, 杯 bui1, 把 baa2, 嚿 gau6, 張 zoeng1, 間 gaan1; (2) Two top 10 classifiers were found in the 2010 cohort: 支 zi1, and 部 bou6; (3) both cohorts overused the general classifier 個
go3; and (4) both cohorts overused 隻 zek3 and 嚿 gau6 to replace sortal classifiers and even to replace the general classifier 個
go3. The pragmatic features and the associated social changes were discussed to understand the minor changes in classifier use between 1995 and 2010 cohorts.
References (18)
Allan, Keith. 1977. “Classifiers.” Language 531: 285-311.
Bolton, Kingsley. 2000. “The Sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the Space for Hong Kong English.” World Englishes 191: 265-285.
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Erbaugh, Mary S. 2002. “Classifiers are for Specification : Complementary Functions for Sortal and General Classifiers in Cantonese and Mandarin.” Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 31 (1): 33-69.
Fang, Fuxi. 1985. “An Experiment on the Use of Classifiers by 4 to 6 Year Olds.” Acta Psychological Sinica 171: 384-392.
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: a Functional Reference Grammar. The University of California Press.
Li, Hui, and Nirmala Rao. 2000. “Parental Influences on Chinese Literacy Development: A Comparison of Preschoolers in Beijing, Hong Kong and Singapore.” International Journal of Behavioural Development 24 (1): 82-90.
Li, Hui, Nirmala Rao, and Shek Kam K. Tse. 2011. “Bridging the Gap: A Longitudinal Study of the Relationship between Pedagogical Continuity and Early Chinese Literacy Acquisition.” Early Years31 (1).
Li, Hui, and Shek Kam K. Tse. 2011. The Early Child Mandarin (Cantonese) Corpus. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mak, David Lai-Woon. 1991. The Acquisition of Classifiers in Cantonese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading.
Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip. 1994. Cantonese : A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
Stokes, Stephanie., and Lydia K.H. So. 1997. “Classifier Use of Language Disordered and Age-matched Cantonese Speaking Children.” Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 21: 83–101.
Szeto, K.K.S. 1998. The Acquisition of Cantonese Classifiers. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hong Kong.
Tse, Shek Kam, and Hui Li. 2011. Early Child Cantonese: Facts and Implications. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Tse, Shek Kam, Hui Li, and Shing On Leung. 2007. “The Acquisition of Cantonese Classifiers by Preschool Children in Hong Kong.” Journal of Child Language 34 (2): 495-517.
Wong, Cathy S.P. (2000). “How Cantonese-speaking Two-year-olds Fend for Themselves through the Ticket of Classifier.” In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Child Language Research Forum, ed. by Eve V. Clark, 149–158. Stanford: Centre for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Tsung, Linda & Dandan Wu
2021.
A Corpus-Based Comparison of the Pragmatic Use of Qian and Hou to Examine the Applicability of Space–Time Metaphor Hypothesis in Early Child Mandarin.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.