Article published in:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 6:2 (2015) ► pp. 133–161

Directive-giving and grammatical forms

Mitigation devices in a medical laboratory setting

| The University of Hong Kong
| City University of Hong Kong
| Hong Kong Hospital Authority
This paper investigates the use of grammatical forms in directive sequences by drawing on daily interactions between colleagues in a medical laboratory in Hong Kong. From a conversation analytic perspective, we focus on how directives in Cantonese are commonly formulated and how the force of a directive is mitigated. Our analysis shows that (1) the imperative seems to be the most frequently used syntactic form for giving directives and there is no apparent hierarchical (‘power’) differentiation, (2) the imperative-formulated directives are frequently mitigated by the use of a range of linguistic forms as well as interactional resources.
Keywords: Cantonese, workplace interaction, Directives, grammar and interaction, mitigation devices
Published online: 28 January 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.6.2.02cha
References
Antaki, Charles, and Alexandra Kent
2012 “Telling People What to Do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, Entitlement and Explanation in Staff Requests to Adults with Intellectual Impairments.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 876–889. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Birte, and Jan Svennevig
2009 “Meeting Talk: An Introduction.” Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 3–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bilbow, Graham
1995 “Requesting Strategies in the Cross-cultural Business Meeting.” Pragmatics 5 (1): 45–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bilbow, Grahame
1997 “Spoken Discourse in the Multicultural Workplace in Hong Kong: Applying a Model of Discourse as ‘Impression Management’.” In The Language of Business: An International Perspective, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Sandra Harris, 21–48. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Juliane House
1989 “Cross-cultural and Situational Variation in Requestive Behavior.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper, 123–154. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boden, Deirdre
1994 The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byon, Andrew Sangpil
2006 “The Role of Linguistic Indirectness and Honorifics in Achieving Linguistic Politeness in Korean.” Journal of Politeness Research 21: 247–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Rong, Lin He, and Chunmei Hu
2013 “Chinese Requests: In Comparison to American and Japanese Requests and with Reference to the “East-West Divide”.” Journal of Pragmatics 551: 140–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter
2010 “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
(eds) 1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1976 “Is Sybil there? The Structure of some American English Directives.” Language in Society 51: 25–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Xiaoyan
2003 Guangzhou Fangyan Jumo Yuqi Zhuci [Sentence-Final Mood Particles of the Guangzhou Cantonese]. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Saeko
2000 Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
2006 “Participation, Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/Response Sequences.” Text & Talk 26 (4/5): 515–543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
2003 “Politeness and Power: Making and Responding to ‘Requests’ in Institutional Settings.” Text 23 (1): 27–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
2010 Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and institutions. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe
2003 Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Keisanen, Tinna, and Mirka Rauniomaa
2012 “The Organisation of Participation and Contingency in Prebeginnings of Request Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (4): 323–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koester, Almut
2010 Workplace Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kwok, Helen
1984 Sentence Particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lee, Cynthia
2005 “A Cross-linguistic Study on Cantonese and English Requests.” Pragmatics 15 (4): 395–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Strategy and Linguistic Preference of Requests by Cantonese Learners of English: An Interlanguage and Cross-cultural Comparison.” Multilingua 301: 99–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee-Wong, Song Mei
2000 Politeness and Face in Chinese Culture. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang Kwong
1990 Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip
2011 Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. (2nd edition). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2014 “Instructions in the Operating room: How the Surgeon Directs their Assistant’s Hands.” Discourse Studies 16 (2): 131–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pufahl Bax, Ingrid
1986 “How to Assign Work in an Office: A Comparison of Spoken and Written Directives in American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 101: 673–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rue, Yong-Ju, and Grace Qiao Zhang
2008 Request Strategies: A Comparative Studies in Mandarin Chinese and Korean. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyay, Shiv R
2003 “Nepali Requestive Acts: Linguistic Indirectness and Politeness Reconsidered.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1651–1677. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vine, Bernadette
2004 Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Directives at Work: Exploring the Contextual Complexity of Workplace Directives.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1395–1405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, Margaret M., and Ronald M. Weigel
1985 “Directive use in a Migrant Agricultural Community: A Test of Ervin-Tripp’s Hypotheses.” Language in Society 141: 63–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2003 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. (2nd edition). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Vincent X
2011 Making Requests by Chinese EFL Learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J
2005 “Interactional and sequential configurations informing request format selection in children’s speech.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen and Margret Selting, 185–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Chan, Angela
2017.  In Identity Struggles [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 69], ► pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Du-Babcock, Bertha & Angela Chi Kuen Chan
2019. Can Simulated Data be Comparable to Authentic Data?: A Comparative Analysis of Meeting Chairing Activities. Business Communication Research and Practice 2:2 ► pp. 62 ff. Crossref logo
Lim, Ni-Eng
2019. Introduction. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 10:2 ► pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Ren, Wei
2018. Mitigation in Chinese online consumer reviews. Discourse, Context & Media 26 ► pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.