Since Sacks’ pioneering work in the 1970s, storytelling has become a favourite topic of research within conversation analysis. Scholars have examined storytelling from the point of view of sequential organization (Jefferson 1978), participation organization (Goodwin 1984), story co-telling (Duranti 1986, Mandelbaum 1987, Lerner 1992), displays of epistemic statuses (Schegloff 1988), and action formation (M. Goodwin 1982, 1990; Mandelbaum 1993; Beach 2000; Beach & Glenn 2011; Wu 2011, 2012). Work has also been done on the management of storytelling in the context of other, concurrent activities (Goodwin 1984, Goodwin & Goodwin 1992, Mandelbaum 2010, Haddington et al. 2014). The aim of this paper is to apply the many insights that researchers have accumulated since Sacks to the analysis and understanding of a single instance of storytelling in a Cantonese conversation. A detailed, step-by-step unpacking of this story will reveal how the contingencies of an interaction, including the interplay of multiple contexts, may leave fine-grained imprints on the shape and character of a story.
1984 “Speakers’ Reportings in Invitation Sequences.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 129–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P., and E. Holt
1998 “Figures of Speech: Figurative Speech and the Management of Topic Transition in Conversation.” Language in Society 271: 495–522.
1986 “The Audience as Co-author.” Text 6 (3): 239–247.
1981Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
1984 “Notes on Story Structure and the Organization of Participation.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 225–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1986 “Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation.” Text 6 (3): 283–316.
1981 “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles-telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’.” Journal of Pragmatics 51: 399–422.
Jefferson, G., and J. Schenkein
1977 “Some Sequential Negotiations in Conversation: Unexpanded and Expanded Versions or Projected Action Sequences.” Sociology 111: 87–103.
LeBaron, C.D., and S.E. Jones
2002 “Closing Up Closings: Showing the Relevance of the Social and Material Surround to the Completion of Interaction.” Journal of Communication 52 (3): 542–565.
1987Collaborative Turn Sequences: Sentence Construction and Social Action. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Irvine.
1992 “Assisted Storytelling: Deploying Shared Knowledge as a Practical Matter”. Qualitative Sociology 151: 247–271.
1993 “Collectivities in Action: Establishing the Relevance of Conjoined Participation in Conversation.” Text 131: 213–245.
2004 “Collaborative Turn Sequences.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by G. Lerner, 1–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1987 “Couples Sharing Stories.” Communication Quarterly 351: 144–170.
1989 “Interpersonal Activities in Conversational Storytelling.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 53 (2): 114–126.
1991 “Conversational Non-co-operation: An Exploration of Disattended Complaints.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 251: 97–138.
1993 “Assigning Responsibility in Conversational Storytelling: The Interactional Construction of Reality.” Text 131: 247–266.
2010 “Concurrent and Intervening Actions during Storytelling in Family ‘Ceremonial’ Dinners.” In Telling Stories: Language, Narrative, and Social Life, ed. by D. Schiffrin, A. De Fina, and A. Nylund, 161–172. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2012 “Storytelling in Conversation.” In Handbook on Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Sidnell, and T. Stivers, 492–507. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Monzoni, C.M., and P. Drew
2009 “Inter-interactional Contexts of Story-interventions by Non-Knowledgeable Story Recipients in (Italian) Multi-person Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2): 197–218.
1978 “Attributions of Responsibility: Blamings.” Sociology 121: 115–121.
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J.M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.