Cover not available
Part of
Language Contact in Africa and the African Diaspora in the Americas: In honor of John V. Singler
Edited by Cecelia Cutler, Zvjezdana Vrzić and Philipp Angermeyer
[Creole Language Library 53] 2017
► pp. 275–304

Number marking in Jamaican Patwa

Variation is examined in marking of number on plural nouns in mesolectal Jamaican Patwa (JP). Earlier claims for grammatical/functional principles constraining variation are found wanting. Two corpora are analyzed. I provide a taxonomy of surface structures which map reliably onto the level of reference, and permit reorganization at an abstract level capable of allowing generalizations. I consider choice between plural -z and zero marking on regular nouns in light of major known potential linguistic constraints – syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and (briefly) phonological. Results are compared with Creoles, African American Vernacular English (AAVE), and African American Diaspora varieties. Conclusions do not match ‘Creole patterns’ advanced in the literature and used as a basis for historical conclusions concerning AAVE and Creole genesis.
Keywords: number marking, plural -z , Jamaican Patwa, English Creoles, AAVE
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Variation in marking number
  • 3.Dimensions of variation
  • 4.The data
  • 5.Constraints on number marking: Nominal reference and NP type
  • 6.Semantic constraints
  • 7.Phonological constraints
  • 8.Envelope of variation: Exclusions
  • 9.Analysis: -z versus zero
  • 10.Discussion
  • 11.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.53.12pat
References
Alleyne, M.
1980 Comparative Afro-American. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bailey, B.
1966 Jamaican Creole Syntax: A Transformational Approach. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1975 Dynamics of a Creole System. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bobyleva, E.
2011 Variable plural marking in Jamaican Patwa and Tok Pisin: A linguistic perspective. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 56(1): 37–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruyn, A.
1995 Noun phrases. In Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction [Creole Language Library 15], J. Arends, P. Muysken & N. Smith (eds), 259–269. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
1981 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corbett, G.
2001 Number. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cunningham, I.
1970 A Syntactic Analysis of Sea Island Creole (“Gullah”). PhD dissertation, University of Michigan. Published 1992 as PADS 75: Publications of the American Dialect Society 75. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Degraff, M.
2007 Kreyòl Ayisyen, or Haitian Creole (Creole French). In Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars, J. Holm & P. Patrick (eds), 101–126. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Deuber, D.
2009 “The English we speaking”: Morphological and syntactic variation in educated Jamaican speech. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 24(1): 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 English in the Caribbean: Variation, Style and Standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dijkhoff, M.
1983 The process of pluralization in Papiamentu. In Studies in Caribbean Language, L. Carrington, D. Craig & R. Dandaré (eds), 217–229. St. Augustine, Trinidad: Society for Caribbean Linguistics.Google Scholar
Faraclas, N.
2007 Tok Pisin (Pidgin/Creole English). In Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars, J. Holm & P. Patrick (eds), 355–372. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Green, L.
2002 African American English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, G.
1980 Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Locating Language in Space and Time, W. Labov (ed.), 1–36. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hackert, S.
2004 Urban Bahamian Creole: System and Variation [Varieties of English around the World G32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, J.
2000 An Introduction to Pidgins and Creoles. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttar, M.
2007 Ndyuka (Creole English). In Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars, J. Holm & P. Patrick (eds), 217–236. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
James, W.
2001 The noun phrase in Tobagonian. Society for Caribbean Linguistics Occasional Paper Series, No. 28. St. Augustine, Trinidad: University of the West Indies.Google Scholar
Kessler, C.
1972 Noun plural absence. In Tense Marking in Black English: A Linguistic and Social Analysis, R. Fasold (ed.), 223–237. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
de Kleine, C.
2007 Negerhollands (Creole Dutch). In Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars, J. Holm & P. Patrick (eds), 255–272. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C. & Lewis, J.
1968 A Study of the Non-Standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City, Vol. 1 & 2. Philadelphia PA: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Lalla, B. & D’Costa, J.
1990 Language in Exile: Three Hundred Years of Jamaican Creole. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzino, G.
2007 Angolar (Creole Portuguese), or Lunga Ngola. In Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars, J. Holm & P. Patrick (eds), 1–24. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.
1986 Number delimitation in Gullah. American Speech 61(1): 33–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P.
1981 The development of the category of number in Tok Pisin. In Generative studies on Creole languages, P. Muysken (ed.), 35–84. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Patrick, P.
1991 Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: -t, -d deletion and past-marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation and Change 3(2): 171–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Functional pressures on plural-marking in Jamaican Patwa. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Caribbean Linguistics, Georgetown, Guyana.
1996 Variation and the mesolect in Jamaican Creole. In Georgetown University Round Table 1996. J. Alatis, C. Straehle, M. Ronkin & B. Gallenberger (eds), 196–220. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1999 Urban Jamaican Creole: Variation in the Mesolect [Varieties of English around the World G17]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Creole, community, identity. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 28(2): 249–277. Special issue: Interaction-based Sociolinguistics and Cultural Studies, C. Mair (ed.).Google Scholar
2004 Jamaican Creole: Morphology and syntax. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax, B. Kortmann, E. Schneider, C. Upton, R. Mesthrie & K. Burridge (eds), 407–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007 Jamaican Patwa (Creole English). In Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars, J. Holm & P. Patrick (eds), 127–152. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
2008 Pidgins, Creoles and linguistic variation. In The Handbook of Pidgins and Creoles, S. Kouwenberg & J. Singler (eds), 461–487. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Patrick, P., Carranza, I. & Kendall, S.
1993 Number-marking in the speech of Jamaican women. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV-XXII) , Ottawa.
Poplack, S. & Tagliamonte, S.
1994 -S or nothing: Marking the plural in the African American diaspora. American Speech 69(3): 227–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., Tagliamonte, S. & Eze, E.
2000 Reconstructing the source of early African American English plural marking: A comparative study of English and Creole. In The English History of African American English, S. Poplack (ed.), 73–105. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rickford, J.R.
1986a Some principles for the study of black and white speech in the South. In Language Variety in the South, M. Montgomery & G. Bailey (eds), 38–62. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
1986b Past-marking in the Guyanese mesolect: A close look at Bonnette. In Variation in Language: NWAV-XV at Stanford, K. Denning, S. Inkelas, F. McNair-Knox & J. R. Rickford (eds), 379–394. Stanford CA: Stanford Linguistics Department.Google Scholar
1987 Dimensions of a Creole Continuum: History, Texts and Linguistic Analysis of Guyanese Creole. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1990 Response to Mufwene 1986. American Speech 65(2): 148–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Down for the count? The Creole Origins hypothesis of AAVE at the hands of the Ottawa Circle, and their supporters. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 21(1): 97–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, J.
2002 The Noun Phrase. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowe, R.
2005 The development of African American English in the oldest Black town in America: Plural -s absence in Princeville, North Carolina. MA thesis, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Sand, A.
1999 Linguistic Variation in Jamaica: A Corpus-Based Study of Radio and Newspaper Usage. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G.
1990 The grammaticalization of tense and aspect in Tok Pisin and Sranan. Language Variation and Change 2(3): 295–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebba, M.
1997 Contact Languages: Pidgins and Creoles. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singler, J.
1988 The place of variation in the formal expression of inflectional processes: Evidence from Kru Pidgin English. In Linguistic Change and Contact: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, K. Ferrara, B. Brown, K. Walters & J. Baugh (eds), 345–353. Austin TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
1989 Plural marking in Liberian Settler English, 1820–1980. American Speech 64(1): 40–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 On the use of sociohistorical criteria in the comparison of creoles. Linguistics 28(4): 645–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Social and linguistic constraints on plural marking in Liberian English. In English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, J. Cheshire (ed.), 544–562. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Yes, but not in the Caribbean. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 21(2): 337–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Examining a pidgin and one of its substrate languages: Plural marking in Vernacular Liberian English and Bassa. Paper presented at the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics , Amsterdam.
Sistren Theatre Collective & Ford-Smith, H.
1986 Lionheart Gal: Life Stories of Jamaican Women. London: The Womens Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, M.
2006 Quantification in Jamaican Creole. PhD dissertation, University of the West Indies at Mona, Kingston, Jamaica.Google Scholar
2011 The expression of number in Jamaican Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(2): 363–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. & Poplack, S.
1988 How Black English past got to the present: Evidence from Samaná. Language in Society 17(4): 513–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S., Poplack, S. & Eze, E.
1997 Plural marking patterns in Nigerian Pidgin English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 12(1): 103–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W.
1962 The Crioulo of Guiné. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W.
1969 A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Yillah, S. & Corcoran, C.
2007 Krio (Creole English), or Sierra Leonean. In Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars, J. Holm & P. Patrick (eds), 175–198. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Rickford, John Russell & Sharese King
2019. Language and Linguistics on Trial. In Variation, Versatility and Change in Sociolinguistics and Creole Studies, ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.