Cover not available
Part of
Language, Culture and Identity – Signs of Life
Edited by Vera da Silva Sinha, Ana Moreno-Núñez and Zhen Tian
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 13] 2020
► pp. 249–274

Chapter 12
How can I persuade you without making self-assertions?

A cognitive rhetorical analysis of the use of fictive questions in an early Daoist text

| Nanjing Tech University
| Zhejiang University
This chapter explores the cognitive underpinnings of rhetoric by presenting a case study of the rhetorical use of non-information-seeking questions in the Zhuangzi (4th c. B.C.), a foundational Daoist text. These questions are: expository questions (“Why do I say this? Because…”) and rhetorical questions (“Why bother?”) (Xiang and Pascual 2016). We analyze fictive questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser 2012) of the perspectives of the writer, the assumed readers and possibly also the discourse characters. We argue that the ubiquitous rhetorical use of fictive questions in ancient written texts is closely related to our basic human capacities such as mental simulation and perspective taking and emerges from our intrinsically conversational mind
Keywords: fictive questions, intersubjectivity, mental simulation, perspective taking, self-persuasion, viewpoint blending, the Zhuangzi
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Basics of fictive questions
  • Data and methodology
  • Analysis
    • Fictive questions in the Here-and-Now Space
    • Fictive questions in the Current Discourse Space
  • Summary and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 April 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.13.12xia
References (122)
References
Adams, Jim W. 2006. The Performative Nature and Function of Isaiah 40–55. New York/London: T & T Clark International.Google Scholar
Adolphs, Ralph. 2006. “How Do We Know the Minds of Others? Domain-Specificity, Simulation, and Enactive Social Cognition.” Brain Research 1079 (1): 25–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. 1853. Aristotle’s Treatise on Rhetoric, Theodore A. Buckley (trans). London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Badarneh, Muhammad A. 2003. The Rhetorical Question as a Discursive and Stylistic Device in the Quran. [Ph.D. Dissertation] Tempe: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beekman, John and Callow, John. 1974. Translating the Word of God: With Scripture and Topical Indexes. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2008. “Underspecification and the Noun/Verb Distinction: Late Archaic Chinese and Khmer.” In The Discourse Potential of Underspecified Structures, Anita Steube (ed.), 55–81. Berlin/ New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Word-Class Systems Between Flexibility and Rigidity: An Integrative Approach.” In Flexible Word Classes: A Typological Study of Underspecified Parts of Speech, Jan Rijkhoff and Eva van Lier (eds), 275–302. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blondell, Ruby. 2002. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bodde, Derk. 1991. “Punctuation: Its Use in China and Elsewhere.” Rocznik Orientalistyczny 47 (2): 15–23.Google Scholar
Bowery, Anne-Marie. 2007. “Know Thyself: Socrates as Storyteller.” In Philosophy in Dialogue: Plato’s Many Devices, Gary A. Scott (ed.), 82–110. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Line. 2013. The Communicative Mind: A Linguistic Exploration of Conceptual Integration and Meaning Construction. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Brown, Julian. 1993. A Palaeographer’s View: The Selected Writings of Julian Brown, Janet Bately, Michelle P. Brown and Jane Roberts (eds). London: Harvey Miller Publishers.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1966. “Definition of Man.” In Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method, 3–24. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Chuji. 2007. Zhuangzi Qianzhu [A Shallow Commentary of the Zhuangzi]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
Chai, David. 2016. “On Pillowing One’s Skull: Zhuangzi and Heidegger on Death.” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 11 (3): 483–500.Google Scholar
Chen, Guying. 2007. Zhuangzi Jinshi Jinyi Zuixin Xiudingban [Modern Commentaries and Translations of the Zhuangzi (newly rev. ed.)]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1954. Ad C. Herennium De Ratione Dicendi (Rhetorica ad Herennium), Harry Caplan (trans.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Classe, Olive (ed.). 2000. Encyclopedia of Literary Translation into English [vol. 2]. London/Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Combs, Steven C. 2004. “The Useless-/Usefulness of Argumentation: The Dao of Disputation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 41 (2): 58–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. The Dao of Rhetoric. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Cooren, François. 2010. Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Communication Theory at the Center: Ventriloquism and the Communicative Constitution of Reality.” Journal of Communication 62 (1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coutinho, Steve. 2015. “Conceptual Analyses of the Zhuangzi.” In Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy, Liu Xiaogan (ed.), 159–191. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara and Sweetser, Eve. 2012. Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Decety, Jean. 2005. “Perspective Taking as the Royal Avenue to Empathy.” In Other Minds: How Humans Bridge the Divide Between Self and Others, Bertram F. Malle and Sara D. Hodges (eds), 143–157. New York/London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eno, Robert. 1996. “Cook Ding’s Dao and the Limits of Philosophy.” In Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, Paul Kjellberg and Philip J. Ivanhoe (eds), 127–151. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Enos, Theresa (ed.). 2013. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estes, Douglas. 2012. The Questions of Jesus in John: Logic, Rhetoric and Persuasive Discourse. Leiden/Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Questions and Rhetoric in the Greek New Testament: An Essential Reference Resource for Exegesis. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, Ward. 2011. Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric. Boston: David R. Godine Publisher.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles and Turner, Mark. 1994. Conceptual Projection and Middle Spaces. UCSD Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Blending as a Central Process of Grammar.” In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele Goldberg (ed.), 113–130. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Conceptual Integration Networks.” Cognitive Science 2 (1): 133–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, Yu-lan. [1948] 1997. A Short History of Chinese Philosophy, David Bodde (ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Galambos, Imre. 2014. “Punctuation Marks in Medieval Chinese Manuscripts.” In Manuscript Cultures: Mapping the Field, Jörg Quenzer, Dmitry Bondarev and Jan-Ulrich Sobisch (eds), 341–357. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ge, Zhaoguang. 2014. An Intellectual History of China, Volume One: Knowledge, Thought, and Belief before the Seventh Century CE, Michael S. Duke and Josephine Chiu-Duke (trans.). Leiden/Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Ervin. 1963. Behaviour in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organisation of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Angus C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Guo, Qingfan. [1894] 2013. Zhuangzi Jishi [Collected Commentaries on Zhuangzi]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Christopher. 1998. Science and Civilisation in China [vol. 7, Part 1: Language and Logic]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harvard-Yenching Institute. 1956. Zhuangzi Yinde [A Concordance to Zhuangzi]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heisey, D. Ray. 1998. Perspectives on Classical Chinese Theories of Rhetoric. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Chinese Communication Society, Taipei. [[URL]]
Herman, Vimala. 1999. “Deictic Projection and Conceptual Blending in Epistolarity.” Poetics Today 20(3): 523–541.Google Scholar
Herrick, James A. 2015. History and Theory of Rhetoric: An Introduction (5th ed.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hogan, Kevin and Speakman, James. 2006. Covert Persuasion: Psychological Tactics and Tricks to Win the Game. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hogan, Partick Colm. 2013. How Authors’ Minds Make Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Jian. 2013. Sixiang Men: Xianqin Zhuzi Jiedu Zendingben [The Gate of Ideas: Interpreting Pre-Qin Philosophers (updated ed.)]. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 1999. “Question-Response Argumentation in Talk Shows.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (8): 975–999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. 1998. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 1984. New Testament Interpretation Through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1998. Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-cultural Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuntz, J. Kenneth. 1997. “The Form, Location, and Function of Rhetorical Questions in Deutero-Isaiah.” In Writing and Reading the Scroll of Isaiah: Studies of an Interpretive Tradition [vol. 1], Craig C. Broyles and Craig A. Evans (eds), 121–141. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Making a Statement: Rhetorical Questions in the Hebrew Psalter.” In Probing the Frontiers of Biblical Studies, J. Harold Ellens and John T. Greene (eds), 156–178. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Labuschagne, Casper Jeremiah. 1966. The Incomparability of Yahweh in the Old Testament. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1996. “Sorry, I’m Not Myself Today: The Metaphor System for Conceptualizing the Self.” In Spaces, Worlds and Grammar, Gilles Fauconnier and Eve Sweetser (eds), 91–123. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. “Virtual Reality.” Studies in Linguistic Sciences 29 (2): 77–103.Google Scholar
2001. “Discourse in Cognitive Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. “Interactive Cognition: Toward a Unified Account of Structure, Processing, and Discourse.” International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 3 (2): 95–125.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard A. 1993. The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, Din Cheuk (trans). 1963. Lao Tzu Tao Te Ching. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung. 2015. “The Rhetoric of the Way: The Arts of Persuasion in the Zhuangzi.” In New Visions of the Zhuangzi, Livia Kohn (ed.), 134–144. St. Petersburg, FL: Three Pines Press.Google Scholar
Legge, James (trans). 1891a. The Texts of Taoism, Part 1: The Tāo Teh King; The Writings of Kwang-dze (Books I-XVII). Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(trans.). 1891b. The Texts of Taoism, Part 2: Writings of Kwang-dze (Books XVIII-XXXIII); The Thâi-Shang Tractate of Actions and Their Retributions. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward. 1999. Writing and Authority in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lu, Xing. 1998. Rhetoric in Ancient China, Fifth to Third Century, BCE: A Comparison with Classical Greek Rhetoric. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lu, Xun. 2005. Lu Xun Quanji Di Jiujuan [Complete Works of Lu Xun, Vol. 9]. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.Google Scholar
Mair, Victor H. 1994. Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
2000. “The Zhuangzi and its Impact.” In Daoism Handbook, Livia Kohn (ed.), 30–52. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Kathy Reiko. 2007. Hearing Between the Lines: The Audience as Fellow-Worker in Luke-Acts and its Literary Milieu. [Ph.D. Dissertation] Waco: Baylor University.Google Scholar
Mead, George H. [1934] 1955. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Christian and Girke, Felix. 2011. The Rhetorical Emergence of Culture. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Meyers, Robin R. 2007. With Ears to Hear: Preaching as Self-Persuasion. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
Moshavi, Adina. 2009. “Two Types of Argumentation Involving Rhetorical Questions in Biblical Hebrew Dialogue.” Biblica 90 (1): 32–46.Google Scholar
Nienkamp, Jean. 2001. Internal Rhetorics: Toward a History and Theory of Self-Persuasion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Todd and Tobin, Vera. 2014. “The Whole is Sometimes Less Than the Sum of its Parts: Toward a Theory of Document Acts.” Language and Cognition 6 (1): 79–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Todd. 2009. From Attention to Meaning: Explorations in Semiotics, Linguistics, and Rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Attention and Rhetoric.” In The Rhetorical Emergence of Culture, Christian Meyer and Felix Girke (eds), 282–303. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Oliver, Robert T. 1961. “The Rhetorical Implications of Taoism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 47 (1): 27–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1971. Communication and Culture in Ancient India and China. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Pascual, Esther. 2002. Imaginary Trialogues: Conceptual Blending and Fictive Interaction in Criminal Courts. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
. 2006a. “Fictive Interaction Within the Sentence: A Communicative Type of Fictivity in Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 17 (2): 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. “Questions in Legal Monologues: Fictive Interaction as Argumentative Strategy in a Murder Trial.” Text & Talk 26 (3): 383–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language, and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver (trans.). Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Puett, Michael. 2013. “Philosophy and Literature in Early China.” In The Columbia History of Chinese Literature, Victor H. Mair (ed.), 70–85. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Quintilian. 1922. The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian, Harold E. Butler (trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, Harold. 2008. “Zhuangzi.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). [[URL]].
Ruby, Perrine, and Decety, Jean. 2001. “Effect of Subjective Perspective Taking During Simulation of Action: A PET Investigation of Agency.” Nature Neuroscience 4 (5): 546–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shih, Vincent Yu-chung. 1959. “Introduction.” In The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons, xi–xlvi. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Mary John. 1982. Persuasion and Human Action: A Review and Critique of Social Influence Theories. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Strecker, Ivo A. and Tyler, Stephen A. 2009. Culture & Rhetoric. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. [1996] 2000. “Fictive Motion in Language and ‘Ception’.” In Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Concept Structuring Systems, 99–175. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Shelley E. and Schneider, Sherry K. 1989. “Coping and the Simulation of Events.” Social Cognition 7 (2): 174–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Els, Paul and Sabattini, Elisa. 2012. “Introduction: Political Rhetoric in Early China.” Extrême-Orient Extrême-Occident (34): 5–14.Google Scholar
Van Krieken, Kobie, Hoeken, Hans, and Sanders, José. 2017. “Evoking and Measuring Identification with Narrative Characters – A Linguistic Cues Framework.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Construction of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Intersubjectivity and the Architecture of the Language System.” In The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, Jordan Zlatev, Timothy. P. Racine, Chris Sinha and Esa Itkonen (eds), 307–331. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Von der Gabelentz, Georg. 1881. Chinesische Grammatik: Mit Ausschluss des Niederen Stiles und der Heutigen Umgangssprache. Leipzig: T. O. WEIGEL.Google Scholar
Wang, Bo. 2013. The Philosophy of Chuang Tzu (2nd ed.). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Haifen. 2015. Guhanyu Fanchou Cidian: Yiwen Juan [Dictionary of Classical Chinese Categories: Interrogatives]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Rongpei (trans.). 1999. Zhuangzi. Changsha: Hunan People’s Publishing House and Beijing: Foreign Language Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Shishun and Han, Mujun. 1993. Laozhuang Cidian [Dictionary of the Laozi and the Zhuangzi]. Jinan: Shandong Education Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Youru. 2003. Linguistic Strategies in Daoist Zhuangzi and Chan Buddhism: The Other Way of Speaking. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Burton. [1968] 2013. The Complete Works of Zhuangzi. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Winans, James Albert. 1920. Public Speaking. New York: The Century Co.Google Scholar
Wu, Kuang-Ming. 1988. “Goblet Words, Dwelling Words, Opalescent Words – Philosophical Methodology of Chuang Tzu.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 15 (1): 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiang, Mingjian and Pascual, Esther. 2016. “Debate with Zhuangzi: Expository Questions as Fictive Interaction Blends in an Old Chinese Text.” Pragmatics 26 (1): 137–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiang, Mingjian. 2016. “Real, Imaginary, or Fictive? Philosophical Dialogues in an Early Daoist Text and its Pictorial Version.” In The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction, Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler (eds), 63–86. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, George Q. 2012. “The Use of Eloquence: The Confucian Perspective.” In Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks, Carol S. Lipson and Roberta A. Binkley (eds), 115–129. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Bojun and Leshi, He. 2001. Guhanyu Yufa Jiqi Fazhan Xiudingban [A Grammar of Ancient Chinese and its Development (rev. ed.)]. Beijing: YUWEN Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ye, Chengyi. [1979] 2004. Zhuangzi Yuyan Yanjiu [A Study on the Fables in the Zhuangzi]. Taipei: Wenshizhe Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yi, Mengchun. 2005. Xianqin Hanyu Yufa [Grammar of Pre-Qin Classical Chinese]. Changsha: Hunan Education Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Mosheng. [1948] 2007. Zhuangzi Xinshi [A New Interpretation of the Zhuangzi]. Beijing: New World Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, Zhenfu. 1991. Zhongguo Xiucixue Shi [A History of Chinese Rhetoric]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan, Racine, Timothy. P., Sinha, Chris and Itkonen, Esa (eds). 2008. The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A. 2004. “The Immersed Experiencer: Toward an Embodied Theory of Language Comprehension.” Psychology of Learning and Motivation 44: 35–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.