Abbasi, A. (Ed.). (2001). Dimensions of human cultures in Central India. New Delhi: Sarup & Sons.Google Scholar
Abrahamov, B. (1998). Islamic theology: traditionalism and rationalism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Adam, Ch. & Tannery, P. (Eds.). (1897–1913). Oeuvres de Descartes. I–XIII v. Paris: Léopold Cerf.Google Scholar
Alanen, L. (2003). Descartes’s concept of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angier, T. (2008). Aristotle’s ethics and the crafts: a critic. Ph.D. dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Anselm of Canterbury. (1998). The major works. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1989). Historical and comparative linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arata, L. (2005). The Definition of Metonymy in Ancient Greece. Style, 39, 55–71.Google Scholar
Ariew, R. (1999). Descartes among the scholastics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1935). The metaphysics. Books X-XIV. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; London: W. Heinemann.Google Scholar
Arnaldez, R. (2000). Averroes: a rationalist in Islam. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Arnett, J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attinger, P. (2021). Glossaire sumérien français principalement des textes littéraires paléobabyloniens [French Sumerian glossary mainly of Paleo-Babylonian literary texts]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Augst, G. (2009). Wortfamilienwörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache [Word family dictionary of contemporary German]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auletta, G. (2011). Cognitive biology: dealing with information from bacteria to minds. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bacon, F. (1874). Inquisitio Legitima de Motu. In J. Spedding, R. Ellis, & D. Heath (Eds.), The Works of Francis Bacon, 7 (pp. 145–170). Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and company. (First published 1608)Google Scholar
(1874a). Of the Dignity and Advancement of Learning. Book II-III. In J. Spedding, R. Ellis, & D. Heath (Eds.), The works of Francis Bacon, 8 (pp. 395–520). Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and company. (First published 1623)Google Scholar
(2000). The new organon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (First published 1620) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). The advancement of learning. New York: Random House. (First published 1605)Google Scholar
Bacon, R. (1920). [URL]. In [URL]R. Steele (Ed.), Opera hactenus inedita Rogeri Baconi, No. V. (pp. 25–175). Oxford: Humphrey Milford for the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bailenson, J., Shum, M., Atran, S., Medin, D., & Coley J. (2002). A bird’s eye view: biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures. Cognition, 84, 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. & Morris, K. J. (2002). Decartes’ dualism. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Balahonova, L. I. (Ed.). (2004). Bol’shoj akademicheskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [The comprehensive academic dictionary of the Russian language], 1. Moskva; Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2010). Bol’shoj akademicheskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [The comprehensive academic dictionary of the Russian language], 14. Moskva; Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2011). Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: towards a consensus view (pp. 7–57). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (Ed.). (1991). The complete works of Aristotle. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). What does semantic tiling of the cortex tell us about semantics? Neuropsychology, 105, 18–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for grounding cognition. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, R. (1987). Norms of language: theoretical and practical aspects. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (eds.), Grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 129–163). New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L., Santos, A., Simmons, K., & Wilson, Ch. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. de Vega, M. Arthur, A. Glenberg, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols and embodiment: debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 245–283). Oxford; New York: Oxford Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, D. (1986). Miracle and the mechanical philosophy: the theology of Robert Boyle in its historical context. PhD dissertation, University of Notre Dame.
Berdjaev, N. A. (1955). Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma [The origin and meaning of Russian communism]. Parizh: YMCA-PRESS.Google Scholar
(1991). Filosofskaja istina i intelligentskaja pravda [The truth of philosophy and the truth of the intelligentsia]. In N. Kazakova (Ed.), Vehi; Intelligencija v Rossii: Sbornik statej 1909–1910 [Landmarks; the Intelligentsia in Russia: Collection of Articles 1909–1910] (pp. 24–42). Moskva: Molodaja gvardija. (First published 1909)Google Scholar
Bergen, B. (2007). Experimental methods for simulation semantics. In M. Gonsales-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 277–301). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berggren, L.[URL] (1986). Episodes in the mathematics of medieval Islam, New York: Springer–Verlag.Google Scholar
Bernstein, H. (1975). Boredom and the ready-made life. Social Research, 42(3), 512–537.Google Scholar
Berry, J. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Sage/Halsted.Google Scholar
Bertman, M. (1991). Body and Cause in Hobbes: Natural and Political. Wakefield, New Hampshire: Longwood Academic.Google Scholar
Berzonsky, M. & Ondrako, M. (1974). Cognitive style and logical deductive reasoning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 43(1), 18–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boden, M. A. (2006). Mind as machine: a history of cognitive science. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bogatova, G. (Ed.). (1992). Slovar’ russkogo jazyka XI–XVII vv. [Dictionary of the Russian language of the 11th to 17th centuries], 18. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1987). Atomic theory and the description of nature. Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press. (First published 1934)Google Scholar
Borodaj, T. (2008). Rozhdenie filosofskogo ponjatija. Bog i materija v dialogah Platona [The birth of a philosophical concept. God and matter in the dialogues of Plato]. Moskva: Izdatel’ Savin S.A.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. & Morrow, D. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247, 44–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. (2002). The past in prehistoric societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brandt, F. (1986). Thomas Hobbes’s mechanical conception of nature. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Brown T. (1954). Herodotus and his profession. The American Historical Review, 59(4), 829–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulgakov, S. N. (1991). Geroizm i podvizhnichestvo [Heroism and asceticism]. In N. Kazakova (Ed.), Vehi; Intelligencija v Rossii: Sbornik statej 1909–1910 [Landmarks; The intelligentsia in Russia: collection of articles 1909–1910] (pp. 43–84). Moskva: Molodaja gvardija. (First published 1909)Google Scholar
Byrne, Ch. ([URL]2001). Matter and Aristotle’s material cause. [URL]Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 31(1), 85–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. W. (1995). The thinking ape. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callaghan, T., Moll, H., Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., Liszkowski, U., Behne, T., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Early social cognition in three cultural contexts. Antigonish: St. Francis Xavier University.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Lupyan, G. (2015). All concepts are ad hoc concepts. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), The conceptual mind: new directions in the study of concepts (pp. 543–566). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayton, N., & Emery N. (2015). Avian models for human cognitive neuroscience: a proposal. Neuron, 86, 1330–1342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clericuzio, A. (1998). The mechanical philosophy and the spring of air: new light on Robert Boyle and Robert Hooke. Nuncius, 13, 69–75. . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J., & Sharp, D. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cole, M., Mesheryakov, B., & Ponomariov, I. (2011). Cross-cultural research in the cultural-historical activity theory tradition. In J. Fons, A. van de Vijver, & S. Breugelmans (Eds.), Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 261–287). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. & Packer, M. Culture and cognition. (2011). In K. D. Keith (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychology: contemporary themes and perspectives (pp. 133–159). Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cole, M. & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Connell, L. & Lynott, D. (2014). Principles of representation: why you can’t represent the same concept twice. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 390–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, H. (2007). Matters of exchange: commerce, medicine, and science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. (1990). Natural magic, hermetism, and occultism in early Modern science. In D. Lindberg & R. Westman (Eds.), Reappraisals of the scientific revolution (pp. 261–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coudert, A. (2009). From ‘the hermetic tradition’ to ‘Western esoterism’. In W. J. Hanegraaff & J. Pijnenburg (Eds.), Hermes in the Academy: ten years’ study of Western esotericism at the University of Amsterdam (pp. 117–22). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (2), 213–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(2002). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 161–205). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). On explaining metonymy: Comment on Peirsman and Geeraerts, ‘‘Metonymy as a prototypical category’’. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 317–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crombie, A. (1963). Medieval and early modern science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2008). Think on my words: exploring Shakespeare’s language. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Beaune, S. (2009). The emergence of cognitive abilities: the contribution of neuropsychology to archeology. In S. de Beaune, F. L. Coolidge, & Th. Wynn (Eds.), Cognitive archaeology and human evolution (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dear, P. (1998). A mechanical microcosm: bodily passions, good manners, and Cartesian mechanism. In Ch. Lawrence & S. Shapin (Eds.), Science incarnate: historical embodiments of natural knowledge (pp. 51–82). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2003). Metaphorical expressions and culture: an indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol, 18 (4), 255–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dem’jankov, V. (2007). Termin «koncept» kak jelement terminologicheskoj kul’tury [The term “concept” as an element of the terminological culture]. In M. V. Ljapon (Ed.), Jazyk kak materija smysla [Language as a matter of meaning] (pp. 606–622). Moskva: Izdatel’skij centr «Azbukovnik».Google Scholar
Des Chene, D. (2001). Spirits and clocks: machine and organism in Descartes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1905). Principia philosophiae [The principles of philosophy]. In Ch. Adam & P. Tannery (Ed.), Oeuvres de Descartes, 8. Paris: Léopold Cerf. (First published 1644)Google Scholar
(1976). Conversation with Burman. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (First published 1896)Google Scholar
(1991). The philosophical writings of Descartes, 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Meditation on first philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (First published 1641) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Discourse on the method. In R. Descartes, Discourse on the Method, Optics, Geometry, and Methodology (pp. 4–64). Indianapolis: Hascett. (First published 1637)Google Scholar
(2008). Principles of philosophy. New York: Barnes & Noble. (First published 1644)Google Scholar
Desroches, D. (2006). Francis Bacon and the limits of scientific knowledge. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, I. (1982). Nauchny`e predstavleniia na drevnem Vostoke [Scientific representations in the ancient East]. In A. N. Shamin (ed.), Ocherki istorii estestvenno-nauchny`kh znanii` v drevnosti (pp. 59–119). Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1991). Gesammelte Schriften [Collected writings], VIII. Stuttgart; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Diodorus, Siculus. (1933–1946). Diodorus of Sicily. London, New York: Loeb.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1958). The principles of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (First published 1930). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, B. (1991). The Janus faces of genius: the role of alchemy in Newton’s thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dolgih, B. (1976). Mifologicheskie skazki i istoricheskie predaniya nganasan [Mythological tales and historical legends of Nganasan]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1958). Le système du monde [The system of the world]. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1991). The logical basis on metaphysics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Edzard, D. (2003). Sumerian grammar. Leiden; Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eliade, M. (1959). Cosmos and history; the myth of the eternal return. New York, Harper.Google Scholar
(1959a). The sacred and the profane: the nature of religion. New York, Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Fedotov, G. P. (1991). Tragedija intelligencii [The tradegy of the intelligentsia]. In G. P. Fedotov, Sud’ba i grehi Rossii [The fate and sins of Russia]. V 2 t. T. 1 (pp. 66–101). Sankt-Peterburg: Sofija.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. -J. (1987). Freedom and civilization among the Greeks. Allison Park, PA: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Feyaerts, K. (2000). Refining the Inheritance Hypothesis: Interaction between metaphoric and metonymic hierarchies. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective (pp. 59–78). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. In S. R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: conference on the origin and development of language and speech, 280 (pp. 20–32). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6 (2), 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch. & Atkins, B. (1994). Starting where the dictionaries stop: the challenge for computational lexicography. In B. Atkins & A. Zampolli (Eds.), Computational approach to the lexicon (pp. 349–393). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, S. L. (1991). Jetika nigilizma [Ethics of nihilism]. In N. Kazakova (Ed.), Vehi; Intelligencija v Rossii: sbornik statej 1909–1910 [Landmarks; The intelligentsia in Russia: collection of articles 1909–1910] (pp. 153–184). Moskva: Molodaja gvardija. (First published 1909)Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (2008). Demons, dreamers, and madmen: the defense of reason in Descartes’s meditations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friberg, J. (2007). A remarkable collection of Babylonian mathematical texts. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisby, D. & Featherstone, M. (Eds.). (1997). Simmel on culture: selected writings. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Frumkina, R. (2007). Social’noe poznanie v kontekste lingvistiki i psihologii [Social cognition in a context of linguistics and psychology]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 1, 145–156.Google Scholar
Frumkina, R., & Mikheev, A. (1996). Meaning and categorization. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Frumkina, R., Miheev, A., Mostovaya, A., & Ryumina, N. (1991). Semantika i kategorizaciya [Semantics and categorization]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Frumkina, R. & Mirkin, B. (1986). Semantika “konkretnoi” leksiki: psiholingvisticheskii podhod [Semantics of “concrete” lexicon: a psycholinguistic approach]. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 45(1), 12–22.Google Scholar
Fuchs, S. (1991) Metatheory as cognitive style. Sociological Perspectives, 34(3), 287–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gajdenko, P. (1987). Jevoljucija ponjatija nauki (XVII–XVIII vv.) [Evolution of the concept of science (17th and 18th cent.)]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2001). Descartes embodied: reading Cartesian philosophy through Cartesian science. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1969). Science and civic life in the Italian Renaissance. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
(2008). History of Italian philosophy. Amsterdam: Rpdopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gasparov, M. L. (1999). Russkaja intelligencija kak otvodok evropejskoj kul’tury [Russian intelligentsia as an offshoot of European culture]. In N.G. Ohotin (Ed.), ROSSIJa/RUSSIA. Vyp. 2 [10]: Russkaja istorija i zapadnyj intellektualizm: istorija i tipologija [Russian history and Western intellectualism: history and typology] (pp. 20–27). Moskva: O.G.I.Google Scholar
(1999a). Intellektualy, intelligenty, intelligentnost’ [Intellectuals, the intelligentsia, education and good manners]. In T. B. Knjazevskaja (Ed.), Russkaja intelligencija. Istorija i sud’ba [Russian intelligentsia. History and destiny] (pp. 5–14). Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, S. (2002). Descartes’ system of natural philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (1997). Diachronic prototype semantics: a contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 435–465). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Words and other wonders: papers on lexical and semantic topics. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2018). Ten lectures on cognitive sociolinguistics. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. & Gevaert, C. (2008). Hearts and (Angry) Minds in Old English. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Culture and language: looking for the mind inside the body (pp. 319–347). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Gevaert, C., & Speelman, D. (2011). How ‘anger’ arose: Hypothesis testing in diachronic semantics. In K. Allan & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp. 109–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger. Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor & R. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the construal of the world (pp. 153–180). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Bakema, P. (1994). The structure of lexical variation: meaning, naming, and context. Berlin; New York: M. de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Yv. (Eds.). (2010). Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. (1966). Religion as a Cultural System. In M. Banton (Ed.), Anthropological approaches to the study of religion (pp. 1–46). York: F.A. Praeger.Google Scholar
Gevaert, C. (2005). The ANGER IS HEAT question: Detecting cultural influence on the conceptualization of ANGER through diachronic corpus analysis. In N. Delbecque, J. van der Auwera, & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), Perspectives on variation: sociolinguistic, historical, comparative (pp. 195–208). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (2015). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York; London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gil, D. & Shen, Y. (2021). Metaphors: the evolutionary journey from bidirectionality to unidirectionality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376, 20200193. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Gill, Ch. (1995). Personality in Greek epic, tragedy, and philosophy: the self in dialogue. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2006). The place of prototypicality in corpus linguistics: Causation in the hot seat. In S. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis (pp. 159–192). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glazov, Ju. (2001). Tesnye vrata. Vozrozhdenie russkoj intelligencii [Close gate. Revival of the Russian intelligentsia]. Spb.: Izd-vo zhurnala «Zvezda».Google Scholar
Glebkin, V. (1994). Nauka v kontekste kul’tury. «Nachala» Evklida i «Czyu chjan suan’ shu» [The Science in a Context of Culture. Euclid’s Elements and the Chiu Chang Suan Shu]. Moskva: Interprax.Google Scholar
(2000). Mir v zerkale kul’tury. Ch.1. Pervobytnaya i tradicional’naya kul’tura, kul’tura Drevnego Egipta, kul’tura Drevnei Mesopotamii. [World in the mirror of culture. P. 1. Primitive culture, culture of Ancient Egypt, culture of Ancient Mesopotamia]. Moskva: Dobrosvet.Google Scholar
(2007). Meshhanstvo. [The lower-middle class] In S. Levit (Ed.), Kul’turologiya. Enciklopediya. [Cultural studies. Encyclopedia]. V 2 t. Т. 1 (pp. 1312–1314). Moskva: ROSSPEN.Google Scholar
(2007a). Poshlost’. [The triteness] In S. Levit (Ed.), Kul’turologiya. Enciklopediya. [Cultural studies. Encyclopedia]. V 2 t. Т. 2 (pp. 242–244). Moskva: ROSSPEN.Google Scholar
(2009). Chislo u Plotina i Augustina [The number in Plotinus’ and Augustine’s philosophies]. In A. Krichevets & S. Bychkov (Eds.), Chislo (pp. 264–272). Moskva: MAKS Press.Google Scholar
(2009a). The problem of sentence meaning: the quantum theory approach. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-first annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1483–1487). Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
(2010). Myshlenie i emocii v mezhdisciplinarnoj perspektive [An Interdisciplinary View on Thinking and Emotions]. Moskva: Modern-A; Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ.Google Scholar
(2011). Hermeneutics and cognitive science: a preliminary approach. In B. Kokinov, A. Karmiloff-Smith, & N. J. Nersessian (Eds.), European perspectives on cognitive science. Proceedings of the European conference on cognitive science EuroCosSci2011 (pp. 1–5). Sophia: New Bulgarian University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Leksicheskaya semantika: kul’turno-istoricheskij podhod [Lexical semantics: cultural-historical approach]. Moskva: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ.Google Scholar
(2012a). Towards historical cognitive science: the case of Ancient Greece. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1602–1607). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
(2013). A socio-cultural history of the machine metaphor. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11 (1), 145–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013a). Kul`turno-istoricheskie osnovaniia gipotezy` o dvukh sistemakh avtobiograficheskoi` pamiati [Cultural-historical underpinnings of a hypothesis of two systems of autobiographical memory]. Istoricheskaia Psihologiia i Sotciologiia Istorii, 6(2), 169–184.Google Scholar
(2014). Cultural-historical psychology and the cognitive view of metonymy and metaphor. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (2), 288–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a). Smena paradigm v lingvisticheskoj semantike: ot izolyacionizma k sociokul’turnym modelyam [Paradigm change in linguistic semantics: from isolationism to sociocultural models]. Moskva; Sankt-Peterburg: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ, 2014.Google Scholar
(2015). The problem of cultural-historical typology from the four-level-cognitive-development theory perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46 (8), 1010–1022. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015a). Cognitive style of culture and the problem of cultural-historical cognitive development. Anthropos, 110 (2), 573–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Struktura leksicheskogo kompleksa filosofija v tekstah russkoj kul’tury XVIII v. [The structure of lexical complex philosophy in the texts of Russian culture of 18th century]. In I. S. Smirnov (Ed.), Ya evaṃ veda … Kto tak znaet … Pamjati Vladimira Nikolaevicha Romanova [Ya evaṃ veda … Who knows in this way … In a tribute of Vladimir Romanov] (pp. 191–210). Moskva: RGGU, 2016.Google Scholar
(2018). Kategorii russkoj kul’tury XVIII–XX vv. Skuka. [Categories of Russian culture of 18th–20th centuries. Boredom] Moskva; Sankt-Peterburg: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ.Google Scholar
(2019). Genezis i struktura leksicheskogo kompleksa “avantjura” [The genesis and structure of the lexical complex of “avantjura”]. In M. Nekljudova & E. Shumilova (Eds.), Russkaja avantjura: identichnosti, proekty, reprezentacii [Russian Adventure: Identities, Projects, Representations] (pp. 408–424). Moskva: Izdatel’skij dom «Delo».Google Scholar
(2019a). Cultural-historical underpinnings of early modern science: the case of Francis Bacon and René Descartes. The International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies, 17(1), 89–102. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2021). Otkryvanie butylok kak predmet lingvokul’turnogo analiza [Bottle opening as a subject of linguistic and cultural analysis]. Russkij Jazyk v Nauchnom Osveshhenii, 41 (1), 64–86.Google Scholar
Glebkin, V., & Sosedova, D. (2015). Perceptivnye portrety abstraktnyh ponjatij: klass “vital’nyh determinantov” [Perceptual profiles of abstract concepts: the class of vital determinants]. Voprosy Psiholingvistiki, 4(26), 33–43.Google Scholar
Glebkin, V., Aljapkina, A., & Bespalova, E. (2014). Perceptivnye portrety abstraktnyh ponjatij (“schast’e”, “svoboda”, “beda”) [Perceptual profiles of abstract concepts (“boredom”, “freedom”, “disaster”)]. Vestnik RGGU, 8(130). Serija "Filologicheskie Nauki. Jazykoznanie", 46–63.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26 (1), 69–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D. (2010). Corpus-driven Cognitive Semantics. Introduction to the field. In D. Glynn & K. Fischer (Eds.), Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: corpus-driven approaches (pp. 1–42). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Polysemy and synonymy: Cognitive theory and corpus method. In D. Glynn & J. Robinson (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (pp. 7–38). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain: metaphor and hidden ideology. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goel, V. (2005). Cognitive neuroscience of deductive reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 475–492). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gogol, N. (1997). Dead Souls. New York: Vintage Classics. (Original work published 1842)Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 323–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gouws, R. H., Heid, U., Schweickard, W., & Wiegand, H. E. (Eds.) (2013). Dictionaries: an international encyclopedia of lexicography: supplementary volume: recent developments with focus on electronic and computational lexicography. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gradovskij, A. (2001). Zadacha russkoj molodezhi [The task of Russian youth]. In A. Gradovskij, Sochinenija [Collected works] (pp. 474–484). Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka. (First published 1879)Google Scholar
Graeser, A.[URL] (1972). Plotinus and the Stoics. A preliminary study. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Bishop of Tours. (1916). The History of the Franks. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1991). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grot, J. (1867). Karamzin v istorii russkogo literaturnogo jazyka [Karamzin in the history of the Russian literary language]. St. Petersburg: Tip. V. Golovina.Google Scholar
Gudkov, L. & Dubin, B. (1994). Ideologija besstrukturnosti (intelligencija i konec sovetskoj jepohi) [The ideology of structurelessness (the intelligentsia and the end of the Soviet era)]. Znamja, 11, 166–179.Google Scholar
Güntürkün, O., & Bugnyar, Th. (2016). Cognition without cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 291–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Győri, G. (2002). Semantic change and cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(2), 123–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Language as cognitive adaptation: from language evolution to language change. Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.Google Scholar
Haidle, M. (2009). How to think a simple spear. In S. de Beaune, F. L. Coolidge, & Th. Wynn (Eds.), Cognitive archaeology and human evolution (pp. 57–74). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2010). Working-memory capacity and the evolution of modern cognitive potential: implications from animal and early human tool use. Current anthropology, 51(1), 149–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hare, B., Call, J., Agnetta, B. & Tomasello, M. (2000). Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Animal Behavior, 59, 771–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know. Animal Behavior, 61, 139–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, P. (1998). The Bible, protestantism, and the rise of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartog, F. (2000). The invention of history: The pre-history of a concept from Homer to Herodotus. History and Theory, 39 (3), 384–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartz, G. A. (2010). Leibniz’s animals: where theology meets mechanism. In J. Smith & O. Nachtomy (Eds.), Machines of nature and corporeal substances in Leibniz (pp. 29–38). Dordrecht etc.: Springer.Google Scholar
Hassing, R. (2011). Descartes on God, creation, and conservation. The Review of Metaphysics, 64(3), 603–20. [URL]Google Scholar
Healy, S. D. (1984). Boredom, self and culture. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press; London: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
Heath, Th. (1956). The thirteen books of Euclid’s Elements. V.1–3. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
(1981). A history of Greek mathematics. V.1. From Thales to Euclid. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Heinrich, J. (2020). The weirdest people in the world: how the West became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Heinrich, J., Heine, S.  J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herodotus. (1981–1990). Herodotus with an English translation by A.D. Godley. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, F. -G. (2007). Words & ideas. The roots of Plato’s philosophy. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317, 1360–1366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (1998). Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 21, 101–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. M. (2014). Group-mindedness. Review of Michael Tomasello’s A Natural History of Human Thinking. Current Biology, 24, 344–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Ch. (1961). The Century of revolution, 1603–1714. Edinburgh: T. Nelson.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1997). Leviathan. R. E. Flathman & D. Johnston (Eds.). New York, London: Norton critical editions. (First published 1651)Google Scholar
Hock, H. H. & Brian, J. D. (2019). Language history, language change, and language relationship: an introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin; Boston: M. de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooykaas, R. (1987). The rise of modern science: when and why? The British Journal for the History of Science, 20, 453–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications; Georgetown University Round Table 1984 (pp. 11–42). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Houk, W., Poth, J., & Snider, J. (1984). Study guide to Accompany University physics: Arfken, Griffing, Kelly, Priest. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1983). Collected Works. V.2: Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: general introduction to a pure phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (First published 1913)Google Scholar
Ivanov-Razumnik, R. V. (1910). Ob intelligencii [About the intelligentsia]. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografija M.M. Stasjulevicha.Google Scholar
(1911). Istorija russkoj obshhestvennoj mysli [The history of Russian social thought]. T.1. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografija M.M. Stasjulevicha.Google Scholar
Jacobson, R. (2002). The metaphoric and metonymic poles. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20) (pp. 41–48). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (First published 1956) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaki, S. (1978). The road of science and the ways of God. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jarcho, V. (1983). Die Weltanschauung des Dichters und die Verantwortung des Helden in der griechischen Tragödie [The poet’s world view and the hero’s responsibility in Greek tragedy]. In H. Kuch (Ed.), Die griechische Tragödie in ihrer gesellschaftlichen Funktion (pp. 41–59). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1983a). Thinking as a skill. In J. Evans (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning (pp. 164–196). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, M. (2008). Frances Yates and the hermetic tradition. Lake Worth, FL: Ibis Press.Google Scholar
Judice, N. (1997). Cognitive style: A three-dimensional model. Ph.D. dissertation. Arizona State University.
Kabadayi, C., & Osvath, M. (2017). Ravens parallel great apes in flexible planning for tool-use and bartering. Science, 357, 202–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kablic, I. (1886). Intelligencija i narod v obshhestvennoj zhizni Rossii [The intelligentsia and the people in the public life of Russia]. Sankt-Peterburg: tip. N.A. Lebedeva.Google Scholar
Kardela, H. (2014). On the notion of lexical nest: a cognitive linguistics perspective. In G. Drożdż & A. Łyda (Eds.), Extension and its limits (pp. 39–59). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Katasonov, V. (1993). Metafizicheskaja matematika XVII v. [Metaphysical mathematics of 17th cent.]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1972). Semantic theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D. (2000). The creation of eternal truths and the nature of God in Descartes. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Keller, R. (1985). Towards a theory of linguistic change. In Th. Ballmer (Ed.), Linguistiс Dynamics: Discourses, Procedures and Evolution (pp. 211–237). Berlin: W. de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989). Invisible-hand theory and language evolution. Lingua, 77, 113–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994). On language change: the invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kempson, R. (1977). Semantic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirsch, J., Güntürkün, O., & Rose, J. (2008). Insight without cortex: Lessons from the avian brain. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 475–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, Sh., Duffy, S., & Uchida, Y. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In Sh. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 136–174). New York, London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kitayama, Sh., Park, H., Sevincer, A. T., Mayumi, K., & Uskul, A. K. (2009). Cultural task analysis of implicit independence: comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 236–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, J. (1992). Greek mathematical thought and the origin of algebra. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Kline, M. (1990). Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times. V.1. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koivisto-Alanko, P. (2000). Abstract words in abstract worlds: directionality and prototypical structure in the semantic change in English nouns of cognition. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Kojève, A. (1964). “L’origine chrétienne de la science modern [Christian Origins of Modern Science.” In L’aventure de l’esprit. Mélanges Alexandre Koyré [Adventure of spirit. In tribute of Alexandre Koyré] (pp. 295–306). Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Kormer, V. F. (1989). Dvojnoe soznanie intelligencii i psevdokul’tura [The dual consciousness of the intelligentsia and pseudo-culture]. Voprosy Filosofii [Philosophy issues], 9, 65–79. (First published 1970)Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (2002). The practice of conceptual history: timing history, spacing concepts. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Futures past: on the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press; Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
(2005). Metaphor in culture: universality and variation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Metaphor: a practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010a). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive linguistics, 21(4), 663–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 37–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koyré, A. (1923). Descartes und die Scholastic [Descartes and scholastics]. Bohn: Verlag von Friedrich.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). [URL]The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (1999). Culture: the anthropologists’ account. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurennoj, V. (2006). Teorija mifa [The theory of myth]. Neprikosnovennyj zapas, 3(47), 39–47.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1994). Principles of linguistic change. V. 1. Internal factors. Oxford, UK; Cambridge [Mass.]: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (2021). Aristotelian powers, mechanism, and final causes in the Late Middle Ages. In B. Hill, H. Lagerlund & St. Psillos (Eds.), Reconsidering causal powers: historical and conceptual perspectives (pp. 82–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Lambourg, J. (2019). “Ma dent me cause des douleurs atroces” [My tooth is causing me excruciating pain]. In R. G. Tatomir (Ed.), East-West dialog. Individual and society through ages. Proceedings of the International interdisciplinary & transdisciplinary conference “East-West – Multitopic – Dialogue” (pp. 29–41). Bucharest: Hyperion University.Google Scholar
Landsbergen, F., Lachlan, R., ten Cate C., & Verhagen A. (2010). A cultural evolutionary model of patterns in semantic change. Linguistics, 48, 363–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar 1: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993). Reference point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1968). Zwei Briefe tiber das Biniire Zahlensystem und die chinesische Philosophie [Two letters on the binary number system and Chinese philosophy]. Stuttgart: Belser-Presse.Google Scholar
(1985). Theodicy: essays on the goodness of God, the freedom of man, and the origin of evil. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court. (First published 1714)Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2012). The original sin of cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 396–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, L. (1978). Primitive mentality. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
(1979). How natives think. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1975). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Ch. T., & Scort, Ch. (1958). A Latin dictionary. Oxford: Calderon Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1996). A Greek-English lexicon. Oxford: Calderon Press.Google Scholar
Lihachev, D., Dmitriev, L., & Ponyrko, N. (1997–2020). Biblioteka literatury Drevnej Rusi [Library of Literature of Ancient Rus’]. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka (Electronic version: [URL]).Google Scholar
Logan, J. (1983). Cognitive Style and Reading. The Reading Teacher, 36(7), 704–707.Google Scholar
Long, A. (1968). Language and thought in Sophocles; a study of abstract nouns and poetic technique. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Lucretius Carus, T. (2004). On the nature of things. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Lunacharskij, A. (1924). Intelligencija v ee proshlom, nastojashhem i budushhem [The intelligentsia in its past, present and future]. Moskva: Novaja Moskva.Google Scholar
Luria, A. (1976). Cognitive development: its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Machamer, P. (2009). Descartes’s changing mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mailloux, S. (1998). Reception histories: rhetoric, pragmatism, and American cultural politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power. V.1. A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, Sh. (2003). Culture, self, and the reality of the social. Psychological Inquiry, 14 (3–4), 277–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Culture and the Self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, S. (1974). Science and religion in seventeenth century England. In Ch. Webster (Ed.), The intellectual revolution of the seventeenth century (pp. 197–217). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory and Cognition, 32, 1389–1400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattheus, S. (2008). Theology and science in the thought of Francis Bacon. Aldershot: Ashgate Pub.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. (1977). Neoplatonism and active principles: Newton and the “Corpus Hermeticum.” In R. Westman & J. McGuire (Eds.), Hermetism and the scientific revolution (pp. 93–142). Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library.Google Scholar
McIntyre, R. & Meloche, M. (1995). Cognitive style and customer orientation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10(1), 75–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKnight, S. (2006). The religious foundations of Francis Bacon’s thought. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. (1994). Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead, G. (1992). Thrice greatest Hermes: studies in hellenistic theosophy and gnosis. V. 2. York Beach, ME: S. Weiser.Google Scholar
Meier, A. (1955). Metaphysische Hintergrunde der spatscholastischen Naturphilosophie [Metaphysical underpinnings of late scholastic naturphilosophy]. Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1906).[URL] Comment les mots changent de sens [How words change meaning]. [URL]L’Année sociologique, 9, 6–43.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (1998). Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merezhkovskij, D. S. (1991). Grjadushhij ham [A coming cad]. In D. S. Merezhkovskij, Bol’naja Rossija [The sick Russia] (pp. 11–110). Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU, 1991. (First published 1906)Google Scholar
Merton, R. (1970). Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England. New York: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar
Migliorini, B.[URL] (1966). The Italian language. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Mihajlovskij, N. K. (1897). Zapiski sovremennika [Notes of a contemporary]. In N. K. Mihajlovskij, Sochinenija [Collected works]. T. 5 (pp. 391–703). Sankt-Peterburg: Tipolitografija B.M. Vol’fa.Google Scholar
Mikheev, A. (1985). Svobodnaya klassifikaciya nabora predmetov (eksperiment v Nagornom Karabahe) [A free classification of a set of objects (an experiment in Nagornij Karabah)]. In R. Frumkina (Ed.), Lingvisticheskie i psiholingvisticheskie struktury rechi [Linguistic and psycholinguistic structures of speech] (pp. 78–93). Moskva: Institut yazykoznapniya.Google Scholar
Miljukov, P. N. (1991). Intelligencija i istoricheskaja tradicija [The intelligentsia and historical tradition]. In N. Kazakova (Ed.), Vehi; Intelligencija v Rossii: Sbornik statej 1909–1910 [Landmarks; the Intelligentsia in Russia: Collection of Articles 1909–1910] (pp. 294–381). Moskva: Molodaja gvardija. (First published 1910)Google Scholar
Miner, R. (2005). The Baconian matrix of Descartes’ Regulae. In N. Smith & J. Taylor (eds.), Descartes and cartesianism (pp. 1–20). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Mischler, J. J., III. (2013). Metaphor across time and conceptual space: the interplay of embodiment and cultural models. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon F. (2007). The machines of Leonardo Da Vinci and Franz Reuleaux. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moran, D. & Cohen, J. (2012). The Husserl dictionary. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Morewedge, P. (1979). A third version of the ontologocal argument in the Ibn Sīnian metaphysics. In P. Morewedge (Ed.), Islamic philosophical theology (pp. 188–222). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Muller, A. (2005). (Ed.). Concepts of culture: art, politics, and society. Calgary, Al.: University of Calgary Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mungello, D. (1977). Leibniz and Confucianism, the search for accord. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Nabokov, V. (2011). Nikolai Gogol. London: Penguin Classics. (First published 1944)Google Scholar
Nachtomy, O. (2010). Leibniz on artificial and natural machines: or what it means to remain a machine to the least of its parts. In J. Smith & O. Nachtomy (Eds.), Machines of nature and corporeal substances in Leibniz (pp. 61–80). Dordrecht etc.: Springer.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O., Sachs, A., & Goetze, A. (1945). Mathematical cuneiform texts. New Haven, Conn.: The American Oriental Society and the American Schools of Oriental Research.Google Scholar
Nicolescu, B. (1991). Science, meaning, & evolution: the cosmology of Jacob Boehme. New York: Parabola Books.Google Scholar
(2014). From modernity to cosmodernity: science, culture, and spirituality. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: how Asians and Westerners think differently − and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, A. (1999). Rule-based and experience-based thinking. PhD dissertation. University of Michigan.
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 653–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oates, W. (Ed.) (1948). Basic writings of Saint Augustine. V.1. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Onians, R. (1951). The origins of European thought about the body, the mind, the soul, the world, time and fate. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Overgaard, S. (2004). Husserl and Heidegger on being in the world. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patrologia Latina. (1844–1855). J. -P. Migne (Ed.). V. 1–217. Paris. (PL); Patrologia Latina database [computer file]. Alexandria, VA: Chadwyck-Healey, 1995.Google Scholar
Peirsman, Y. & Geeraerts, D. (2006). Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 269–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006a). Don’t let metonymy be misunderstood: An answer to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 327–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phemister, P. (2010). Monads and Machines. In J. Smith & O. Nachtomy (Eds.), Machines of Nature and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz (pp. 39–60). Dordrecht etc.: Springer.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Garcia, R. (1976). Psychogenesis and the history of science. N.J.: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pika, S., Sima, M. J., Blum, C. R., Herrmann, E., & Mundry, R. (2020). Ravens parallel great apes in physical and social cognitive skills. Scientific Reports, 10, 20617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2009). How the mind works. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pjataeva, N. V. (2006). Antropocentricheskij i sistemocentricheskij principy lingvistiki v dinamicheskom issledovanii leksicheskih gnezd [Anthropocentric and systemocentric principles of linguistics in a dynamic research of lexical nests]. Ufa: Gilem.Google Scholar
Plato. (1892). The dialogues of Plato. New York & London: Macmillan & co.Google Scholar
Plato. (1914–1930). Plato in 12 Vol. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
Plutarch. (1958). Plutarch’s Lives. V. 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. (1989). Politics, language, and time: essays on political thought and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Political thought and history: essays on theory and method. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomeranc, G. (1995). Chelovek niotkuda [The Man from nowhere]. In G. Pomeranc, Vyhod iz transa [Getting out of trance] (pp. 103–145). Moskva: Jurist. (First published 1969)Google Scholar
Popkin, R. (1990). Polytheism, deism and Newton. In J. E. Force & R. H. Popkin (Eds.), Essays on the context, nature, and influence of Isaac Newton’s theology (pp. 27–42). Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. (1986). Empirical studies of prototypes. In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 53–61). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of Meaning. In H. Putnam, Mind, language and reality (pp. 215–271). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabb, Th. (1974). Religion and the Rise of Modern Science. In Ch. Webster (Ed.), The intellectual revolution of the seventeenth century (pp. 262–279). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Radden, G. (2000). How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective (pp. 93–108). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rāshid, R.[URL] (1994). The development of Arabic mathematics: between arithmetic and algebra. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. (2008). Prehistory: the making of the human mind. New York: Modern Library, Random House Pub. Group. Google Scholar
Richardson, M. E. J. (2004). Hammurabi’s laws: text, translation, and glossary. London; New York: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. & Christiansen, M. (2013). (Eds.). Cultural evolution: society, technology, language, and religion. Cambridge, Mass.; London: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013a). Intgroduction. In P. Richerson & M. Christiansen (Eds.), Cultural evolution: society, technology, language, and religion (pp. 1–21). Cambridge, Mass.; London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Riding, R. & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: D. Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar
(2000). Cognitive styles. Stamford, Conn.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Roberge, J. & Flexer, B. (1983). Cognitive style, operativity, and mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(5), 344–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (2007). Wisdom in practice: Socrates’ conception of technē. Ph.D. dissertation. Queen’s University, Kingston.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romanov, V. N. (1991). Istoricheskoe razvitie kul`tury`. Problemy` tipologii [Historical development of culture. Problems of typology]. Moskva: Nauka. Glavnaia redaktciia vostochnoi` literatury`.Google Scholar
(2014). Kul`turno-istoricheskaia antropologiia [Cultural-historical anthropology]. Moskva; Sankt-Peterburg: Centr gumanitarny`kh initciativ; Universitetskaia kniga.Google Scholar
Römer, W. (1969). Einige Beobachtungen zur Göttin Nini(n)sina auf Grund von Quellen der Ur III-Zeit und der altbabylonischen Periode [Some observations on the goddess Nini(n)sina based on sources from the Ur III period and the Old Babylonian period]. In W. Röllig & M. Dietrich (Eds), lišān mit[h]urti. Festschrift Wolfram Freiherr von Soden zum 19 VI. 1968 gewidmet von Schülern und Mitarbeitern. Alter Orient und Altes Testament, 1 (pp. 279–305). Kevelaer: Butzon & Bercker; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag des Erziehungsvereins.Google Scholar
(2001). Hymnen und Klagelieder in sumerischer Sprache [Hymns and Lamentations in Sumerian]. Alter Orient und Altes Testament, 276. Kevelaer: Butzon & Bercker; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag des Erziehungsvereins.Google Scholar
Roochnik, D. (1996). Of art and wisdom: Plato’s understanding of techne. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rossano, M. (2010). Supernatural selection. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Röttger-Rössler, B. (1993). Autobiography in question. On self presentation and life description in an Indonesian society. Anthropos, 88(4/6), 365–373.Google Scholar
Rubin, R. (1970). Cognitive style in pregnancy. The American Journal of Nursing, 70 (3), 502–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. (1993). Francis Bacon. New York: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Saburov, E. (2006). Razbuhajushhaja proslojka [Swelling layer]. Neprikosnovennyj zapas, 3(47), 14–17.Google Scholar
Sagal, P. T. (1994). Mind, man, and machine: a dialogue. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Saint Augustine. (1998). Confessions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Samuhin, N., Birenbaum, V., & Vygotsky, L. (1981). K voprosu o demencii pri bolezni Pika. In Hrestomatiya po patopsihologii [Concerning the question about dementia at Piсk disease] (pp. 114–149). Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. (First published 1934)Google Scholar
Sanderson, S. (1995). Social transformations: a general theory of historical development. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scaltsas, T. (1994). Substances and universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. (1993). System of transcendental idealism. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. -J. (2000). English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: from corpus to cognition. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selischev, A. (1928). Yazyk revolyucionnoi epohi [The language of the revolutionary epoch]. М.: Rabotnik prosvescheniya.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2002). A cognitive stylistic approach to mind style in narrative fiction. In E. Semino & J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive Stylistics. Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 95–122). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Mind style twenty-five years on. Style, 41(2), 153–173.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1911). Philosophische Kultur [Philosophical culture]. Leipzig: Verlag von Dr. Werner Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2018). From Humanism to Hobbes. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (1991). Obrazovanshhina [Education without moral ideals]. Novyj Mir, 5, 28–46. (First published 1974)Google Scholar
Spacks, P. M. (1995). Boredom: the literary history of a state of mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spedding, J., Ellis, R., & Heath, D. (Eds.). (1857–1874). The Works of Francis Bacon. V. 1–15. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.Google Scholar
Spengler, O. (1920). Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Erster Band. Gestalt und Wirklichkeit [The decline of the West. Volume one. Form and actuality]. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
(1966). The decline of the West. V. 1. Form and actuality. New York: Alfren A. Knopf, 1991.Google Scholar
Stepanov, Ju. (2001). Konstanty: Slovar’ russkoj kul’tury [Constants: the language of Russian culture]. Moskva: Akademicheskij Proekt.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2012). The evolved apprentice: how evolution made humans unique. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stimson, D. (1935). Puritanism and the New Philosophy in Seventeenth Century England. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 3, 321–34. [URL]Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2015). Prototype effects in grammar. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 562–579). Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, M. -L. (1984). The Sumerian language. Copenhagen: Akademik Forlag.Google Scholar
Thucydides. (1900). History of the Peloponnesian War. Oxford: Clarendon press.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, L. (2010). War and peace. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1868–1869) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). Тhe human adaptation for culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 509–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Cultural transmission: A view from chimpanzees and human infants. In U. Schönpflug (Ed.), Cultural transmission: psychological, developmental, social, and methodological aspects (pp. 37–43). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2009a). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Becoming human: a theory of ontogeny. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Methodological challenges in the study of primate cognition. Science, 334, 1227–1228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Hare, B. (2003). Chimpanzees understand psychological states – the question is which ones and to what extent. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 153–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Hobson, P. (2005). The emergence of social cognition in three young chimpanzees. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(1).Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A., & Ratner, H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomes, Y. (2004). Cognitive style, achievement, and ethnicity: A study in higher education. Ph.D. dissertation. Richmond, Virginia: Virginia Commonwealth University.
Traugott, E. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 57, 33–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Historical pragmatics. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 538–561). Oxford/Malden, MA: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E., & Dasher, R. (2001). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tulviste, P. (1991). The cultural-historical development of verbal thinking. Commack, N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (2000). Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective (pp. 133–145). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Urbach, P. (1987). Francis Bacon’s philosophy of science: An account and a reappraisal. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Uspenskij, B. A. (1999). Russkaja intelligencija kak specificheskij fenomen russkoj kul’tury [Russian intelligentsia as a specific phenomenon of Russian culture]. In N. G. Ohotin (Ed.), ROSSIJa/RUSSIA. Vyp. 2 [10]: Russkaja istorija i zapadnyj intellektualizm: istorija i tipologija [Russian history and Western intellectualism: history and typology] (pp. 7–19). Moskva: O.G.I.Google Scholar
Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Katunar, D., Nisbett, R. E., & Kitayama, S. (2008). Holism in a European cultural context: Differences in cognitive style between Central and East Europeans and Westerners. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 321–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasilevich, G. M. (1936). (Sostavitel`). Materialy` po e`venkii`skomu fol`cloru [Materials on Evenk folklore]. Vy`p. 1, Leningrad: Izd-vo Instituta narodov Severa TCIK SSSR im. P. G. Smidovicha.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. (1991). Mortals and immortals. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Volkov, V. (1999). The Concept of Kul’turnost’: Notes on the Stalinist Civilizing Process. In S. Fitzpatrick (Ed.), Stalinism: New Directions (pp. 210–230). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vygotsky L. (1984). Rannee detstvo [An early childhood]. In L. Vygotsky, Sobranie sochinenii, 4 (pp. 340–367). Moskva: Pedagogika. (First published 1933/1934)Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Waerden, B. L. van der. (1954). [URL]Science awakening. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. (1964). Thucydides. Phoenix, 18(4), 251–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1981). Prelude to Galileo: essays on medieval and sixteenth-century sources of Galileo’s thought. Dordrech: D. Reidel Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1904). Die «Objectivität» sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis [The ‘objectivity’ of sociological and socio-political knowledge]. Archiv fur Sozialwissenschaft und Socialpolitik, 19, 22–97.Google Scholar
Webster, Ch. (1975). The great instauration: science, medicine, and reform, 1626–1660. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
(1982). From Paracelsus to Newton: magic and making of modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weinberger, J. (2005). Francis Bacon and the Unity of Knowledge: Reason and Revelation. In C. Martin & J. Solomon (Eds.), Francis Bacon and the refiguring of early modern thought: essays to commemorate the Advancement of learning (1605–2005) (pp. 109–28). Aldershot: Ashgate Pub.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. & Tulviste, P. (1992). L.S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28, 548–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westfall, R. (1958). Science and religion in seventeenth-century England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Westman, R. (1977). Magical reform and astronomical reform: The Yates thesis reconsidered. In R. Westman & J. McGuire (Eds.), Hermeticism and the scientific revolution (pp. 1–91). Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (2010). Experience, evidence, and sense: the hidden cultural legacy of English. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S., Rinck, M., McNamara, T., Bower, G., & Morrow, D. (1993). Mental models and narrative comprehension: some qualifications. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 141–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witkin, H. (1967). A cognitive-style approach to cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 2(4), 233–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witkin, H. A., & Berry, J. W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6(1), 4–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, F., Goodenough, R., & Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Witkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witt, C. (1989). Substance and essence in Aristotle: an interpretation of Metaphysics VII–IX. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Ways of being: potentiality and actuality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1986). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wray, A. & Grace, G. W. (2007). The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117, 543–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yaran, C. (2003). Islamic thought on the existence of God: with contributions from contemporary Western philosophy of religion. Washington: Council For Research In Values and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Yasnitsky, A. & van der Veer, R. (2014). Introduction: What is this book and what is it about? In A. Yasnitsky, R. van der Veer, & M. Ferrari (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 1–8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. (1964). Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yee, E. & Thompson-Schill, S. (2016). Putting concepts into context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1015–1027. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagorin, P. (1999). Francis Bacon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, G. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Weslele Press.Google Scholar