Chapter 5. The cultural bases of linguistic form
The development of Nanti quotative evidentials
Culture-driven grammaticalization theory posits that cultural influence on linguistic form is mediated by the emergence of communicative practices which increase the frequency of particular lexical items, pragmatic inferences, and patterns of discourse, thereby putting in place a crucial pre-condition for their grammaticalization. The goal of this chapter is to contribute to the development of culture-driven grammaticalization theory by developing an account of the cultural basis for the grammaticalization of quotative evidentials in Nanti, an Arawak language of lowland southeastern Peru. In particular, it is argued that Nanti quotative evidentials grammaticalized from inflected verbs of speaking that achieved high discourse frequencies due to communicative practices that link respectful communicative conduct towards others with the avoidance of speculation about others’ actions and internal states. As part of this communicative practice, Nantis largely restrict their discussion of others’ actions and internal states to two domains: reported speech regarding others’ actions and internal states, and actions that they witnessed themselves, which can also serve to index internal states.
References (56)
Bibliography
Agha, A. (1994). Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 277–302.
Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baer, G. (1984). Die Religion der Matsigenka, Ost-Peru: Monographie zu Kultur und Religion eines Indianervolkes des Oberen Amazonas. Basel: Wepf.
Basso, E.B. (1995). The last Cannibals: A South American Oral History. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Beier, C., Michael, L., & Sherzer, J. (2002). Discourse forms and processes in lowland South America: An areal-typological approach. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 121–145.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T.A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 253–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733.
Clark, H.H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
Crowhurst, M.J., & Michael, L.D. (2005). Iterative footing and prominence-driven stress in Nanti (Kampa). Language, 81(1), 47–95.
Eberhardt, C.C. (1910). Indians of Peru. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Errington, J. (1988). Structure and style in Javanese: A semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Evans, N. (2003). Context, culture, and structuration in the languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 13–40.
Ferrerro, A. (1866). Los Machiguengas, Tribu Selvática del Sur-oriente Peruano. Villava-Pamplona: Editorial OPE.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. London: MacMillan.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hanks, W.F. (1987). Discourse genres in a theory of practice. American Ethnologist, 14(4), 668–692.
Hanks, W.F. (1990). Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hanks, W.F. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Colorado: Westview Press.
Hopper, P.J., & Traugott, E.C. (2003). Grammaticalization, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Irvine, J. (1998). Ideologies of honorific language. In B.B. Schieffelin, K.A. Woolard, & P.V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 51–67). New York: Oxford University Press.
Izquierdo, C., & Johnson, A. (2007). Desire, envy and punishment: A Matsigenka emotion schema in illness narratives and folk stories. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 31(4), 419–444.
Johnson, A.W. (2003). Families of the forest: The Matsigenka Indians of the Peruvian Amazon. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kamio, A. (1994). The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(1), 67–100.
Keating, E. (1998). Power sharing: Language, rank, gender and social space in Pohnpei, Micronesia. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lai, I.-W. (2009). Time in the Iquito Language (PhD). University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Michael, L. (2008, August 29). Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society (PhD). University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Munro, R., Ludwig, R., Sauerland, U., & Fleck, D.W. (2012). Reported speech in Matses: Perspective persistence and evidential narratives. International Journal of American Linguistics, 78(1), 41–75.
Pullum, G.K. (1989). The great Eskimo vocabulary hoax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7(2), 275–281.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
Robbins, J., & Rumsey, A. (2008). Introduction: Cultural and linguistic anthropology and the opacity of other minds. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2), 407–420.
Santos-Granero, F. (2004). The enemy within: Child sorcery, revolution, and the evils of modernization in Eastern Peru. In N.L. Whitehead & R. Wright (Eds.), In Darkness and Secrecy: The anthropology of assault sorcery and witchcraft in Amazonia (pp. 272–305). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Schatzki, T.R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schieffelin, B.B. (1996). Creating evidence: Making sense of written words in Bosavi. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 435–460). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scheiffelin, B. (2008) Speaking only your own mind: Reflections on confession, gossip, and intentionality in Bosavi (PNG). Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2), 431–441.
Silverstein, M. (1985). Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In E. Mertz & R. Parmentier (Eds.), Semiotic mediation (pp. 219–259). Orlando: Academic Press.
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3-4), 193–229.
Simpson, J. (2002). From common ground to syntactic construction: Associated path in Warlpiri. In N.J. Enfield (Ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture (pp. 287–307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sohn, H. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stasch, R. (2011). Position paper: Towards an anthropological theory of mind. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, 36(4), 32–36.
Strauss, S., & Eun, J.O. (2005). Indexicality and honorific speech level choice in Korean. Linguistics, 43(3), 611–651.
Urban, G. (1991). A discourse-centered approach to culture: Native South American Myths and Rituals. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Wacquant, L. (2004). Habitus. In M. Zafirovski (Ed.), International encyclopedia of economic sociology (pp. 315–319). London: Routledge.
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M.I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W.P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium (pp. 97–195). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Yum, J.O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs, 55(4), 374–388.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
San Roque, Lila
2019.
Evidentiality.
Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1
► pp. 353 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.