Cover not available
Part of
Language Documentation and Endangerment in Africa
Edited by James Essegbey, Brent Henderson and Fiona Mc Laughlin
[Culture and Language Use 17] 2015
► pp. 277–312

Describing endangered languages

Experiences from a PhD grammar project in Africa

The present contribution deals with documenting underdocumented and endangered languages in Africa. It focuses on the documentation of languages through PhD programs as most grammatical descriptions produced today stem from PhD theses. The focus lies on facets of the organization and conception of a PhD grammar project on the endangered Bantu language Yeyi. This project resulted in a published grammatical description in about 4 years. The article describes important aspects of the research program as they relate to the development of the grammatical description as well as the writing process of the grammatical description itself. In doing so the relationship between the creation of a comprehensive grammatical description and prior preparation for the fieldwork, e.g. survey work, developing cultural expertise, the team environment both in the field and at home, are elaborated against a backdrop of stateof- the-art theorizations about descriptive grammars. I situate the work on the Yeyi grammar in the context of the newly emerging documentary-linguistics discipline, and provide some suggestions for how PhD documentation projects should be carried out in the 21st century.
Published online: 22 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.17.12sei
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2007 Linguistic fieldwork: Setting the scene. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60: 1–11.Google Scholar
Baumbach, Erdmann J.M.
1997 Bantu languages of the Eastern Caprivi. In Namibian Languages. Reports and Papers, Wilfrid H.G. Haacke & Eduard D. Elderkin (eds). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz
1911 Introduction. In Handbook of American Indian Languages, Part 1 [Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 40], Franz Boas (ed.), 3–83. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Botne, Robert & Kershner, Tiffany L.
2006 Tense and cognitive space: On the organization of tense/aspect systems in Bantu languages. Ms. (later published in Cognitive Linguistics 19).
Bouquiaux, Lux & Thomas, Jaqueline
(eds) 19762 Enquête et description des langues à tradition orale, Vols. I, II, & III. Paris: Société des Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Bright, William
2005 Contextualizing a grammar. Studies in Language 30(2): 245–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botne, Robert D.
1983 On the notion ‘inchoative verb’ in Kinyarwanda. In Le Kinyarwanda. Étude linguistices [Langues et cultures africaines], Francis Jouannet (ed.). Paris: Société des Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire
2008 Linguistic Fieldwork Methodology: An Introduction to Data Elicitation Methods in the Field and the Classroom. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Breu, Walter
1985 Handlungsgrenzen als Grundlage der Verbalklassifikation. In Slavistische Linguistik 1984. Referate des X. Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens [Slavistische Beiträge 184], Werner Lehfeldt (ed.), 9–34. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
1994 Interactions between lexical, temporal and aspectual meanings. Studies in Language 18(1): 23–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chelliah, Shobbana L. & de Reuse, Willem J.
2011 Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork. Berlin: Springer DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Mary
1988 An accentual analysis of the Zulu noun. In Autosegmental Studies on Pitch Accent, Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds), 51–93. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. & Goldsmith, John
1984 Autosgemental Studies in Bantu Tone. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Patricia
2010 Digital keys for unlocking the humanities’ riches. The New York Times, November 16 2010.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1988 The role of the field linguist. Notes on Linguistics 41: 4–6.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2006 The organization of reference grammars: A typologist user’s point of view. In Catching Language. The Standing Challange of Grammar Writing, Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), 136–170. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Crystal, David
2000 Language Death. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark
2011 The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2010 Basic Linguistic Theory. Methodology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007 Field linguistics: A minor manual. Sprachtypologie und Universalien Forschung 60(1): 12–31.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Rice, Keren
No date. Cambridge Grammatical Descriptions. Guidelines for potential contributors.
Dryer, Matthew S.
2006 Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Catching Language. The Standing Challange of Grammar Writing, Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), 207–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Arienne M.
2010 Models of successful collaboration. In Grenoble, Lenore A. & Furbee, N. Louanna (eds), Language Documentation. Practices and Values, 193–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Ethics and practicalities of cooperative fieldwork and analysis. In Essentials of Language Documentation, Jost Gippert, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Ulrike Mosel (eds), 31–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Dench, Alan
2006 Introduction: Catching language. In Catching Language. The Standing Challange of Grammar Writing, Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), 1–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleisch, Axel
2000 Lucazi Grammar. A Morphosemantic Analysis. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Good, Jeff
2010 Valuing technology. Finding the linguist’s place in a new technological universe. In Grenoble, Lenore A. & Furbee, N. Louanna (eds), Language Documentation. Practices and Values, 111–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guarisma, Gladys & Möhlig, Wilhelm J.G.
(eds) 1986 La methode dialectometrique appliquée aux langues africaines. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Hale K., Krauss, Michael, Watahomigie Lucille J., Yamamoto Akira Y., Craig Colette G., LaVerne, Jeanne Masayesva & England, Nora C.
1992 Endangered languages. Language 68: 1–42Google Scholar
Hellwig, Birgit
2003 The Grammatical Coding of Postural Semantics in Goemai (A West Chadic Language of Nigeria). PhD dissertation, Max Planck Institut für Psycholinguistik and Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2008 Reproduction and preservation of linguistic knowledge: Linguistics’ response to language endangerment. Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 337–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006a How to miss a paradigm or two: Multifunctional ma- in Tagalog. In Ameka, Dench & Evans (eds), 487–526.Google Scholar
2006b Language Documentation: What it is and what is it good for? In Essentials of Language Documentation, Jost Gippert, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Ulrike Mosel (eds), 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics 36: 161–195. [URL]> or [URL] DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kershner, Tiffany Lynne
2002 The Verb in Chisukwa: Aspect, Tense, and Time. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
Kibrik, Aleksandr E.
2005 Collective field work. Advantages or disadvantages? Studies in Language 30(2): 259–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2004 Data in linguistics. The Linguistic Review 21:175–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Documentation of endangered languages. A priority task for linguistics. ASSIDUE, Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt Nr. 1. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Philosophische Fakultät, Universität Erfurt.
1980 Aufbau einer Grammatik zwischen Sprachtypologie und Universalistik. In Wege zur Universalienforschung, Gunter Brettschneider & Christian Lehmann (eds), 29–37. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lukusa, Stephen
2009 Shiyeyi-English Dictionary. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lukusa, Stephen T.M.
2002 Groundwork in Shiyeyi Grammar with a Shiyeyi-English Glossary. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lüpke, Friederike
2005 Small is beautiful: Contributions of field-based corpora to different linguistic disciplines, illustrated by Jalonke. Language Documentation and Description 3: 75–105.Google Scholar
Marten, Lutz
2010 Review of “A Grammar of Yeyi. A Bantu Language of Southern Africa” by Frank Seidel. Afrika und Übersee 91: 137–140.Google Scholar
Mettouchi, Amina
2013 Segmenting spoken corpora in lesser-described languages: New perspectives for the structural analysis of speech. Plenary talk at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Split (Croatia) 18–21 September. [URL]> and [URL]
Möhlig, Wilhelm J.G.
2003 The prosodological structure of Herero. FAB 15: 165–179.Google Scholar
1982 Dialektometrie in Afrika. Methoden zur Messung synchroner sprachlicher Nähe. In Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur in Afrika. Vorträge gehalten auf dem III. Afrikanistentag, Köln 14–15 Oktober 1982, Ulrike Claudi & Rainer Vossen (eds), 209–254. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
1967 Die Sprache der Gciriku. Phonologie, Prosodologie und Morphologie. PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.
Moseley, Christopher
(ed.) 2010 Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, 3rd edn. Paris, UNESCO Publishing. [URL] (13 April 2014).Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike
2006 Grammaticography: The art and craft of writing grammars. In Ameka, Dench & Evans (eds), 41–68.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Simon & Thieberger, Nick
2012 Language description and hypertext: Nunggubuyyu as a case study. In Electronic Grammaticography [Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication 4], Sebastian Nordhoff (ed.), 63–77. [URL] (28 November 2013).Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
2005 Grammar writing for a grammar-reading audience. Studies in Language 30(2): 351–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul & Ratliff, Martha
(eds) 2001 Linguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
2005 A grammar as a communicative act or What does a grammatical description really describe? Studies in Language 30(2): 367–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren
2005 A typology of good grammars. Studies in Language 30(2): 385–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1991 Aspekttheorie. In Aspektsysteme [Arbeitspapier Nr. 14 N.F.]), Hans-Jürgen Sasse (ed.), 1–35. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Seidel, Frank
2004 Review of “Groundwork in Shiyeyi Grammar with a Shiyeyi-English Glossary” by Stephen T.M. Lukusa. Annual Publication in African Linguistics 2: 135–137Google Scholar
2008 A Grammar of Yeyi: A Bantu Language of Southern Africa. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Seyfeddinipur, Mandana
2012 Gesture: Understanding the role of gesture in communication: How gestures can be described. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork, Nicholas Thieberger (ed.), 147–164. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
2001 Sull’ utilita e il danno della storia della linguistica. In Storia del pensiero linguistico: linearità, fratture e circolarità. Atti del Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, Verona, 11–13 novembre 1999, Giovanna Massariello Merzagora (ed.), 45–67. Roma: il Calamo.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane
(ed.) 2007 When is a linguist’s work done and dusted? [URL] (3 December 2013).
Smith, Carlota
1997[1991] The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommer, Gabriele
2010 Review of “A grammar of Yeyi. A Bantu language of southern Africa” by Frank Seidel. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 30(1): 142–144.Google Scholar
1995. Ethnographie des Sprachwechsels: Sozialer Wandel und Sprachverhalten bei den Yeyi (Botswana). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Sommer, Gabriele & Vossen, Rainer
1995 Linguistic variation in Siyeyi. In The Complete Linguist. Papers in Memory of Patrick J. Dickens, Anthony Traill, Rainer Vossen & Megan Biesele (eds), 407–479. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nicholas
(ed.) 2012 The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaux, Bert, Cooper, Justin & Tucker, Emily
2007 Linguistic Field Methods. Eugene OR: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1967 Linguistics in Philosopy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C.
2003 Defining documentary linguistics. In Language Documentation and Description, Vol. 1, Peter K. Austin (ed.), 35–51. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Steigertahl, Helene
2019. Chapter 1.4. Introducing a corpus of English(es) spoken in post-independence Namibia. In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 88], ► pp. 98 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.