Article published in:
Land and Language in Cape York Peninsula and the Gulf Country
Edited by Jean-Christophe Verstraete and Diane Hafner
[Culture and Language Use 18] 2016
► pp. 159–178

Hyponymy and the structure of Kuuk Thaayorre kinship

| Monash University
The Kuuk Thaayorre lexicon of kinship can be divided into four subsystems, each of which is hyponymically related to the others. At the finest level of granularity, the set of referential terms (e.g. kanam ‘[someone’s] elder brother’) distinguishes thirty-four classes of kin. These are hyponyms of the twenty-one vocative terms (e.g. waanhn! ‘Big Brother!’, a term which may also be used to address a male speaker’s son’s son or any speaker’s brother’s son’s son). The vocative forms are in turn hyponyms of the sixteen bereavement terms (e.g. piluump, which may be used to refer to someone bereaved of an elder brother, or elder sister, brother’s son’s daughter, brother’s son’s son and so on), while the seven kinship hand signs – which are hypernyms of the bereavement terms – are the most semantically broad of the system. In this manual register, an elder brother is indicated by a point to the shin, as is any sibling, grandchild or grandparent of the same patriline as ego. The respective semantic ranges of the hand signs can be precisely delimited in terms of three features (patriline, matriline and generational harmony), organizing principles which would otherwise be invisible. The purpose of this chapter is twofold: (a) to explore the covert categories that are revealed by a semantic analysis of the four subsystems and the relationships between them; and (b) to outline the structure of kinship in Kuuk Thaayorre.
Published online: 18 February 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.18.08gab
References
Alpher, Barry
1972 On the genetic subgrouping of the languages of southwestern Cape York Peninsula, Australia. Oceanic Linguistics 11: 67–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Anastasia, Elizabeth Marrkilyi Ellis, Alice Gaby & Jennifer Green
Forthcoming. Pointing to the body: kin signs in Australian Indigenous sign languages.
Goodenough, Ward
1965 Yankee kinship terminology: A problem in componential analysis. American Anthropologist 67: 259–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blythe, Joe
2013 Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization. Language 89: 883–919. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Gregory
2015 Marra and Kriol: The Loss and Maintenance of Knowledge Across a Language Shift Boundary. Ph.D. Dissertation, Australian National University.
Dixon, R.M.W
1971 A method of semantic description. In Danny Steinberg & Leon Jakobovits, eds. Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 436–471.Google Scholar
1972 The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nick
1992 Multiple semiotic systems, hyperpolysemy, and the reconstruction of semantic change in Australian languages. In Guenter Kellerman & Michael Morrissey, eds. Diachrony within Synchrony. Bern: Peter Lang. 475–508.Google Scholar
Gaby, Alice
2006 A Grammar of Kuuk Thaayorre. PhD Dissertation, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. A Grammar of Kuuk Thaayorre.
Garde, Murray
2002 Social Deixis in Bininj Kun-wok Conversation. PhD Dissertation, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken
1966 Kinship reflections in syntax: Some Australian languages. Word 22: 318–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1971 A note on a Walbiri tradition of antonymy. In Danny Steinberg & Leon Jakobovits, eds. Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 472–482.Google Scholar
1982 The logic of Damin kinship terminology. In Jeffrey Heath, Francesca Merlan & Alan Rumsey, eds. Languages of Kinship in Aboriginal Australia. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1982 Introduction. In Jeffrey Heath, Francesca Merlan & Alan Rumsey, eds. Languages of Kinship in Aboriginal Australia. Sydney: University of Sydney. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey, Francesca Merlan & Alan Rumsey
1982 Languages of Kinship in Aboriginal Australia. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1988 Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, Semiotic and Communicative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred
1909 Classificatory systems of relationship. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 39: 77–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Straus, Claude
1969 The Elementary Structures of Kinship (Translation of the 1967 French second edition ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
McConnel, Ursula
1940 Social organization of the tribes of Cape York Peninsula, north Queensland: marriage systems - Wikmunkan. Oceania 10: 434–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick
1982 Neutralization and degrees of respect in Gurindji. In Jeffrey Heath, Francesca Merlan & Alan Rumsey, eds. Languages of Kinship in Aboriginal Australia. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick & Ian Keen
2011 The transition from Kariera to an asymmetrical system: Cape York Peninsula to North-East Arnhemland. In Doug Jones & Bojka Milicic, eds. KinshipKinship, Language, and Prehistory: Per Hage and the Renaissance in Kinship Studies. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. 99–132.Google Scholar
Nash, David
2014 Alternating generations again again: a response to Wierzbicka on generation moieties. Proceedings of the 44 th Australian Linguistics Society . Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Powell, Fiona
2002 Transformations in Guugu Yimithirr kinship terminology. Anthropological Forum 12: 177–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred
1951 Murngin social organization. American Anthropologist 53: 37–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Harold
1978 Australian Kin Classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Lauriston
1937 The Social Anthropology of a Totemic System in North Queensland, Australia. PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
1958 People without politics: The Australian Yir Yoront. In Verne Ray, ed. Systems of Political Control and Bureaucracy in Human Societies: Proceedings of the 1958 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Seattle: American Ethnological Society. 1–7.Google Scholar
Stanner, W.E.H
1936-1937 Aboriginal modes of address and reference in the North-West of the Northern Territory. Oceania 7: 300–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Peter
1978 Wik: Aboriginal Society, Territory and Language at Cape Keerweer, Cape York Peninsula, Australia. PhD Dissertation, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
1982 Personal power, kin classification and speech etiquette in Aboriginal Australia. In Jeffrey Heath, Francesca Merlan & Alan Rumsey, eds. Languages of Kinship in Aboriginal Australia. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Taylor, John
1984 Of Acts and Axes. PhD Dissertation, James Cook University.Google Scholar
Thomson, Donald
1946 Names and naming in the Wik MoNkan Tribe. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 76: 157–168.Google Scholar
1955 Two devices for the avoidance of first cousin marriage among the Australian Aborigines. Man 55: 39–40 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1972 Kinship and Behaviour in North Queensland. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Wegener, Claudia
2013 Savosavo kinship terminology: Social context and linguistic features. Oceanic Linguistics 52: 318–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Gaby, Alice
2017.  In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Green, Jennifer, Anastasia Bauer, Alice Gaby & Elizabeth Marrkilyi Ellis
2018. Pointing to the body. Gesture 17:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.