Article published in:
Land and Language in Cape York Peninsula and the Gulf Country
Edited by Jean-Christophe Verstraete and Diane Hafner
[Culture and Language Use 18] 2016
► pp. 199–218

Correlation of textual and spatial reference

This and that

| Australian National University
This paper considers spatial/textual overlaps in the system of the three basic demonstrative categories, roughly translatable as ‘this’, ‘that’ and ‘yonder’ in Jawoyn, a Gunwinyguan language of the upper Northern Territory. The paper especially focuses on the proximal (‘this’) demonstrative in relation to the ‘that’ demonstrative, and argues that the former should be understood as a psycho-social category that implies ‘perceptual newness’, a concentration of focus, and unrecoverability from either prior discourse or assumable identifiability. The paper thus does not treat this ‘proximal’ demonstrative category a priori as grounded in some fixed spatial-locational sense, but as including semantic dimensions that enable its functioning as an index blending and expressing spatial differentiation in relation to other aspects of information, content and identifiability, including non-deictic socio-cultural ones. As always in demonstrative systems, its contrast with other demonstrative categories also conditions its indexical potential.
Published online: 18 February 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.18.10mer
References

References

Cutfield, Sarah
2011 Demonstratives in Dalabon: A Language of Southwestern Arnhem Land. PhD Dissertation, Monash University.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick
2003 Demonstratives in space and interaction: Data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language 79: 82–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2003a Introduction: Comparative non-Pama-Nyungan and Australian historical linguistics. In Nicholas Evans, ed. The Non-Pama-Nyungan languages of Northern Australia: Comparative Studies of the Continent's most Linguistically Complex Region. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. 3–25.Google Scholar
2003b Bininj Gun-wok: A Pan-dialectal Grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hanks, William
2005 Explorations in the deictic field. Current Anthropology 46: 191–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1984 Functional Grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus
1996 Demonstratives in narrative discourse: A taxonomy of universal uses. In Barbara Fox, ed. Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 205–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merlan, Francesca
1989 Some aspects of textual relations in Jawoyn, Northern Australia. In Mary Key & Henry Hoenigswald, eds. General and American Ethnolinguistics: In Remembrance of Stanley Newman. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 417–443.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Geoffrey, Carl Voegelin & Florence Voegelin
1966 Languages of the World: Indo-Pacific Fascile 6 (=AL 8, ii).Google Scholar
van Egmond, Marie-Elaine
2012 Enindhilyakwa Phonology, Morphosyntax and Genetic Position. PhD Dissertation, University of Sydney.