Chapter published in:
Consensus and Dissent: Negotiating Emotion in the Public Space
Edited by Anne Storch
[Culture and Language Use 19] 2017
► pp. 193–212

Emotional Edgelands

| University of Cologne
Even though terminologies for emotions and interior states can be, in principle in any given field context, elicited and listed as linguistic data, these extracted terminologies are not necessarily used. Everyday communication practices, storytelling and historical narration can be decidedly void of epressions of emotions, for various reasons: emotions can be a discursive taboo, they may be communicated only in specific environments, and speaking about them – using emotional language – might be linked to particular contexts and environments (which might not be given in field settings). Therefore, it makes sense to ask about the indexicality of emotional talk and the semiotics of interiority. In Nigerian Jukun-speaking communities, which are in the focus of this contribution, emotional performances and the use of linguistic devices that help to express interior states are closely linked to the semioticization of marginality, the construction of identity concepts and the negotiation of historical experiences. Everyday emotional operations, in turn, are treated in different ways – in silent accounts, through another language, or simply not at all.
Keywords: Jukun, semiotics of marginalization, sadness, gender, secrecy
Published online: 10 March 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.19.10sto
References

References

Barbalet, J. M.
(2001) Emotion, social theory, and social structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Batibo, H.
(2005) Language death and decline in Africa: Causes, consequences and challenges. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Beek, W. van.
(2014) Shrines and sacred places in two traditional West-African religions. In P. Post, P. Nel, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Sacred spaces and contested identities (pp. 53–70). Trenton, NJ: African World Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W.
1968 [1940] Theses on the philosophy of history. Illuminations, H. Arendt (Ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Blench, R. M.
(1998) The status of the languages of Central Nigeria. In M. Brenzinger (Ed.), Endangered languages in Africa (pp. 187–206). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Bromber, K. & Smieja, B.
(Eds.) (2004) Globalisation and African languages: Risks and benefits. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dinslage, S. & Storch, A.
(2002) Zum Funktionswandel oraler Texte – Inhalt und Form. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 152(2), 241–252.Google Scholar
Engelenhoven, A. van.
(2012) Hide and seek in the deer’s trap: Language concealment and linguistic camouflage in Timor Leste. Paper presented at the KNAW workshop on Dynamics of Ritual and Secret Languages, Amsterdam. http://​repository​.tufs​.ac​.jp​/bitstream​/10108​/75529​/1​/B130​_77​-100​.pdf
Farley, P., & Symmons Roberts, M.
(2011) Edgelands. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gordon, L. R.
(2008) An introduction to Africana philosophy. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haring, L.
(2011) Techniques of creolization. In R. Baron & A. C. Cara (Eds.), Creolization as cultural creativity (pp. 178–197). Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harnischfeger, J.
(2004) Rivalität unter Frauen: Häusliche Gewalt und Hexerei in einer Erzählung der Jukun, Nigeria. Fabula, 45, 33–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Die Bedeutung der Religion bei der Entstehung von Zentralgewalten. Sakrale Könige in Nigeria. Paper presented at Morphomata, University of Cologne.
Forthcoming. Myths of origin. The Jukun and their sacred kingdom. In A. Storch Ed. Jukun histories. In memoriam Johannes Harnischfeger
Ingold, T.
(2000) The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopytoff, I.
(Ed.) (1987) The African frontier: The reproduction of traditional African Society. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Koschorke, A.
(2013) Wahrheit und Erfindung. Grundzüge einer Allgemeinen Erzähltheorie. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S.
(2013) Memorylands. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meek, C. K.
(1931) A Sudanese Kingdom. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Nel, P.
(2014) Ownership of the sacred: Complex claims and appropriations. In P. Post, P. Nel & W. van Beek (Eds.), Sacred spaces and contested identities (pp. 135–146). Trenton, NJ: African World Press.Google Scholar
Rusch, P.
Forthcoming. The sources in Jukun history. In A. Storch Ed. Jukun histories. In memoriam Johannes Harnischfeger
Smith, L.
(2006) Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L.
(Ed.) 2013 Imperial debris. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, A.
(2010) Failing literacy? On the meaning of writing. In P. Zima (Ed.), Oracy and literacy (pp. 265–283). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
(2011) Secret manipulations. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2020.  In Metasex – The Discourse of Intimacy and Transgression [Culture and Language Use, 22], Crossref logo
Storch, Anne & Nico Nassenstein
2020.  In Metasex – The Discourse of Intimacy and Transgression [Culture and Language Use, 22], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.