Philosophical issues in ethnophysiography
Landform terms, disciplinarity, and the question of method
Ethnophysiography is a nascent discipline, one which draws on at least a half-dozen existing disciplines. These disciplines exist in productive tension, a tension which produces a range of possible answers to some central questions. These questions include: What is being analyzed? What issues arise when gathering data? How are questions framed to access data? What is the goal of ethnophysiography? How is human meaning connected to human expression, in the context of place language? What are the implications of applying the reconstructed data? And, if ethnophysiography is to be seen as a nascent discipline, how does it relate to other disciplines? This chapter expands on these questions that will help to develop and strengthen the concepts at the center of ethnophysiography, give it an identity, and suggest further research possibilities.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Reid, Geneviève & Renée E. Sieber
2021.
Unavoidable expertise, ‘technocratic positionality,’ and GIScience: eliciting an indigenous geospatial ontology with the Eastern Cree in Northern Quebec.
Gender, Place & Culture 28:4
► pp. 541 ff.
Reid, Geneviève, Renée Sieber & Sammy Blackned
2020.
Visions of time in geospatial ontologies from Indigenous peoples: a case study with the Eastern Cree in Northern Quebec.
International Journal of Geographical Information Science 34:12
► pp. 2335 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.