Article published in:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 4:2 (2017) ► pp. 249272

Full-text

Metonymy in human interaction
References

References

Anderson, S. R.
(1971) On the role of deep structure in semantic interpretation. Foundations of Language, 7(3), 387–396.Google Scholar
Aramburu, F.
(2016) Patria. Barcelona: Tusquets.Google Scholar
Aristotle
[Janko, R.] (1987) Poetics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ashton, D.
(1972) Picasso on art: A selection of views. New York, NY: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Ault, J.
(Ed.) (2006) Felix Gonzalez-Torres. Göttingen: Steidl Publishers.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.
(1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(Ed.) (2000) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
(2011) Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, B.
(2013) Metonymy in language, thought, and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Blanco-Carrión, O., Barcelona, A., & Pannain, R.
(2018) Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Blunt, A.
(1969)  Picasso’s Guernica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brdar, M.
(2007) Metonymy in grammar: Toward motivating extensions of grammatical categories and constructions. Osijek: Josip Juraj StrossmayerUniversity.Google Scholar
Brown, R. & Gilman, A.
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.),Style in language (pp. 253–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coëgnarts, M., & Kravanja, P.
(2015) Embodied cinematic subjectivity: Metaphorical and metonymical modes of character perception in film. In M. Coëgnarts & P. Kravanja (Eds.), Embodied Cognition and Cinema (pp. 221–243). Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Colman, F., & Anderson, J.
(2004) On metonymy as word-formation: With special reference to Old English. English Studies, 85(6), 547–565. Crossref.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(1993) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(4), 335–370. Crossref.Google Scholar
Denroche, C.
(2015) Metonymy and language: A new theory of linguistic processing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dévényi, J.
(1996) Metonymy and drama: Essays on language and dramatic strategy. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 270 ]
Du Marsais, C. C.
(1757) Traité des tropes pour servir d’introduction à la rhetorique et à la logique. Leipsic: Gaspar Fritsch.Google Scholar
Dżereń-Głowacka, S.
(2007) Beating up intelligence: Metonymy in Terry Pratchett’s novels. In K. Kosecki (Ed.), Perspectives on metonymy: Proceedings of the International Conference “Perspectives on Metonymy” held in Łódź, Poland, May 6–7, 2005 (pp. 335–348). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S.
(1977) Wait for me, roller skate. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.), Child discourse (pp. 165–188). New York, NY: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. Crossref.Google Scholar
Feld, R.
(1988) Guston in time. Arts Magazine, November, 44.Google Scholar
Freed, B. F.
(1981) Foreign talk, baby talk, native talk. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 28, 19–39. Crossref.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R.
(2004) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar
Green, D.
(2005) Metonymy in contemporary art: A new paradigm. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Smith, J. H.
(1976).The structure of communication in early language development. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T.
(1966) The hidden dimension. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D.
(1996) The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Helle, L. J.
(1994) Metaphor and metonymy: A theme with variations. Scando-Slavica, 40(1), 37–52.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. & Smiley, P.
(1987) Early word meanings: The case of object names. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 63–89. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
(1956) Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In R. Jakobson & M. Halle (Eds.), Fundamentals of Language (pp. 55–82). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, J. D.
(2008) “Committing the perfect crime”: Sexuality, assemblage, and the postmodern turn in American art. Art Journal, 67(1), 38–53. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kirtland-Grech, G.
(2014) Música y metonimia en Oriana de Fina Torres. Confluencia: Revista Hispánica de Cultura y Literatura, 30(1), 101–112. Crossref.Google Scholar
Knapp, M. L.
(1972) Nonverbal communication in human interaction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 271 ]
Langacker, R. W.
(1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38. Crossref.Google Scholar
(2009) Metonymic grammar. In K. -U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 45–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought, and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López-Ozieblo, R.
(2016) Adquiriendo ELE a través de los personajes de Almudena Grandes. Revista Foro de Profesores de E/LE, 16, 147–155.Google Scholar
Loring, M. W.
(1919) Methods of studying controlled word associations. PhD Dissertation, John Hopkins University. Baltimore, MD: Waverley Press.Google Scholar
Matzner, S.
(2016) Rethinking metonymy: Literary theory and poetic practice from Pindar to Jakobson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Frank, M. G., & Hwang, H. S.
(2013) Nonverbal communication: Science and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Matute, A. M.
(2014) Demonios familiares. Barcelona: Destino.Google Scholar
Newport, E. E.
(1975) Motherese: The speech of mothers to young children. Phd dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G.
(1995) Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics, 12(2), 109–132. Crossref.Google Scholar
Paivio, A.
(1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Panther, K. -U., & Thornburg, L.
(Eds.) (2003) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
Petrenko, V. F., & Korotchenko, E. A.
(2012) Metaphor as a basic mechanism of art (painting). Psychology in Russia, 5, 531–567.Google Scholar
Popova, Y. B.
(2015) Stories, meaning, and experience: Narrativity and enaction. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J.
(1995) The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. J.
(1979) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, J. E., & Jakes, S.
(2004) The contribution of metaphor and metonymy to delusions. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 77, 1–17. Crossref.Google Scholar
Runia, E.
(2006) Presence. History and Theory, 45(1), 1–29. Crossref.Google Scholar
Ryland, S.
(2011) Resisting metaphors: A metonymic approach to the study of creativity in art analysis and practice. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Brighton.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.
(1975) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 344–369). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, K. G., & Muller, J.
(1987) Class, race, and oppression: Metaphor and metonymy in ‘Black’ South African theatre. Critical Arts: A Journal for Cultural Studies, 4(3), 40–58.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 272 ]
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J.
(1986) The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237–252. Crossref.Google Scholar
van Herwegen, J., Dimitriou, D., & Rundblad, G.
(2013) Development of novel metaphor and metonymy comprehension in typically developing children and Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(4),1300–1311. Crossref.Google Scholar
van Veuren, M. J.
(2012) Tooth and nail: Anxious bodies in Neill Blomkamp’s District 9 . Critical Arts, 26(4), 570–586. Crossref.Google Scholar
Ward, G. L.
(2004) Equatives and deferred reference. Language, 80(2), 262–289. Crossref.Google Scholar
Zhang, W.
(2016) Variation in metonymy: Cross-linguistic, historical, and lectal perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar