Cover not available
Article published In:
Transcategoriality: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Danh Thành Do-Hurinville and Huy Linh Dao
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:1] 2018
► pp. 39–60

Particle drop of mimetics in Japanese

A Discourse Grammar approach

| York University
Drawing on ideas from Discourse Grammar (Heine et al. 2013), this article examines characteristics of the Japanese reduplicated mimetics, arguing that they are transcategorial, able to function across different planes of grammar, either as mimetic adverbs belonging to Sentence Grammar (SG) or mimetic “theticals” belonging to Thetical Grammar (TG) (Kaltenböck et al. 2011: 879). The former expresses a manner of an action, typically occurring in the immediately preverbal position, as in huwahuwa (to) uku [mim quot float] ‘float lightly ’. By contrast the latter is the speaker’s re-enactment of the event, as in the case of “ Huwahuwa, shita de tsubuseru toohu gurai no katasa desu.” ‘Fluffy-fluffy, (the baby food should) have softness like tofu that can be crushed by (your) tongue.’, where the mimetic ‘re-enacts’ the speaker’s mouth feel (fluffiness) when she put the food into her mouth. The particle drop of the reduplicated mimetics is syntactically optional in SG, but obligatory in TG. The article suggests adding mimetics to the list of theticals, as the fronted zero-marked mimetics followed by a pause display three of the defining prototypical properties of theticals (Kaltenböck et al. 2011): (i) prosodic property (they display comma intonation), (ii) syntactic independence (they are not modifiers of the predicate), and (iii) semantic non-restrictiveness (they do not restrict the semantic content of the predicate).
Keywords: ideophones, Thetical Grammar, transcategoriality, quotative particle, demonstration
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Japanese mimetics
  • 3.Characteristics of theticals
  • 4.Phonological characteristics
  • 5.Semantic characteristics
  • 6.Syntactic characteristics of mimetic theticals
    • 6.1Repositioning
    • 6.2Soo-substitution
    • 6.3Imperatives
    • 6.4Scope of negation
    • 6.5Marking by the quotative particle
  • 7.Similarity with interjections
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 30 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00012.tor
References (25)
References
Akita, K. (2009). A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of mimetics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kobe University, Japan.Google Scholar
Akita, K., & Usuki, T. (2016). A constructional account of the ‘optional’ quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics, 521, 245–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, F. (1992). Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(2–3), 101–118.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N. (2005). Parentheticals. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.), vol. 91, 179–82. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 661, 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistic Compass, 6(12), 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M. & Akita, K. (2017), An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, 531, 501–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Do-Hurinville, T., Dao, H. L., & Hancil, S. (2015). La transcatégorialité à travers les langues. University of Rouen, Typescript.Google Scholar
Hamano, S. (1998). The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H. (2013). An outline of discourse grammar. In S. Bischoff & C. Jany (Eds.), Functional approaches to language (pp. 175–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ježek, E. & Ramat, P. (2009). On parts-of-speech transcategorization. Folia Linguistica, 43(2), 391–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2011). On thetical grammar. Studies in Language, 35(4), 852–897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1968). The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1982). Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 131, 91–106.Google Scholar
McGregor, W. (1994). The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 14(1), 63–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Ideophones as the source of verbs in Northern Australian languages. In E. F. K. Voeltz, & C. Kilian-Hatz (Eds.), Ideophones (pp. 205–221). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murayama, Y. (2005). Saka no tochū [Midway of the slope]. Tokyo: Shūeisha.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B. (1996). Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Robert, S. (1997). From body to argumentation: grammaticalization as a fractal property of language (the case of Wolof ginnaaw). Berkeley Linguistics Society, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting (14–16 February 1997), Special Session on Syntax and Semantics in African Languages, BLS 23S, 116–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). The challenge of polygrammaticalization for linguistic theory: fractal grammar and transcategorial functioning. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodgesand, & D. S. Rood (Eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories (pp. 119–142). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toratani, K. (2007). An RRG analysis of manner adverbial mimetics. Language and Linguistics, 8(1), 311–342.Google Scholar
(2017). The position of to/∅-marked mimetics in Japanese sentence structure. In N. Iwasaki, P. Sells, & K. Akita (Eds.), The Grammar of Japanese mimetics: Perspectives from structure, acquisition and translation (pp. 35–72). London and NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Barnes, Kathryn Rose, Cornelia Ebert, Robin Hörnig & Theresa Stender
2022. The at-issue status of ideophones in German: An experimental approach. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 DOI logo
Nuckolls, Janis
2022. The Mindful Animism of Ideophony in Pastaza and Upper Napo Kichwa. Ethos 50:3 ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Akita, Kimi
2019. Chapter 9. Mimetics, gaze, and facial expression in a multimodal corpus of Japanese. In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16], ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Akita, Kimi
2021. A typology of depiction marking. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 865 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.