Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 6:2 (2019) ► pp.221–246

Narrative metaphors in Polish perfumery discourse

| Warsaw University
The Polish perfumery discourse is permeated with various kinds of metaphors, starting with lexicalized metaphorical terms, e.g., nuta “note”, to creative, extended, and elaborated metaphors, e.g., Intensywnie doprawiony przedpokój prowadzi do cytrusowegosalonu, który jak dla mnie mógłby zajmować trochę mniej miejsca, bo najbardziej wartościowa jest kuchnia – serce domu! “Intensively flavored entrance hall leads to the citrus salon, which for me could be smaller because the most valuable is the kitchen – the heart of a home!” This paper concentrates on a specific type of verbal metaphor, used quite often in the Polish perfumery discourse, called narrative metaphor. Such narrative metaphors can encompass extensive fragments of a discourse or even a whole text. This study describes the triggers of narrative metaphors in perfumery discourse and emphasizes the importance of reference in such metaphor analysis.
Keywords: metaphor, narrative, perfume, olfactory perception
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • Composition of the corpus
    • Annotation procedure
    • Reference in the metaphor identification procedure
    • Narrative and metaphor
  • 3.Results
    • Types of narrative metaphors
    • Metaphorical triggers
      • Scents of perfumes
      • Lexicalized terms
      • Names of perfumes
  • 4.Discussion
    • Metaphor and context
    • Metaphor or allegory?
    • Functions of narrative metaphors in perfumery discourse
    • Reference in narrative metaphor
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00039.zaw
References (61)
References
Badyda, E. (2013). “Upadły anioł zmysłów?”: Metaforyka zapachu i percepcji węchowej we współczesnej polszczyźnie. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1949). Language and philosophy: Studies in method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (2009). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cain, W. S. (2012). History of research on smell. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception. Volume VI a: Tasting and Smelling (pp. 197–229). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2011). Metaphor and reconciliation. The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2016). Mixed metaphors from a discourse dynamic perspective: A non-issue? In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 17–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and necessity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2016). The “dull roar” and the “burning barbed wire pantyhose”: Complex metaphor in accounts of chronic pain. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 155–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Crisp, P. (2005). Allegory, blending, and possible situations. Metaphor and Symbol, 20 (2), 115–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough?. Language and Literature, 17 (4), 291–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crisp, P., Heywood, J., & Steen, G. (2002). Metaphor identification and analysis, classification and quantification. Language and Literature, 11 (1), 55–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2017). Mapping and narrative in figurative communication. In B. Hampe, (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 200–219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrzyńska, T. (1984). Metafora [Metaphor]. Wrocław/ Warszawa/ Kraków/ Gdańsk/ Łódź: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistics Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. (2009a). The cage metaphor: Extending narratology into corpus studies and opening it to the analysis of imagery. In S. Heinen & R. Sommer (Eds.), Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research (pp. 109–128). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2009b). An introduction to narratology. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2015). The allegorical character of political metaphors in discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 5 (2), 264–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.). (2016). Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grzegorczykowa, R. (2012). Określenia percepcji węchowej w języku polskim [Denotations of olfactory perception in Polish]. In R. Grzegorczykowa, & A. Mikołajczuk (Eds.), Świat widziany poprzez słowa. Szkice z semantyki leksykalnej (pp. 160–168). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
Hellsten, I. (2002). The politics of metaphor: Biotechnology and biodiversity in the media. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (1), 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2016). A view of “mixed metaphors” within a conceptual metaphor theory framework. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kunz, K. A. (2010). Variation in English and German nominal coreference: A study of political essays. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 81, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008 [1980]). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Narayan, S. (2010). Toward a computational model of narrative. AAAI Fall Symposium: Computational Models of Narrative, 21–28.Google Scholar
Le Guérer, A. (2002). Olfaction and cognition: A philosophical and psychoanalytic view. In C. Rouby, et al. (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1875). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Moore, K. E. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17 (2), 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21 (1), 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, B. (2011). The role of metaphor scenarios in disease management discourses: Foot and mouth disease and avian influenza. In S. Handl & H. J. Schmid (Eds.), Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp. 115–142). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, S., & Rihs, A. (2014). Metaphor as argument: Rhetorical and epistemic advantages of extended metaphors. Argumentation, 28 (2), 133–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pisarkowa, K. (1972). Szkic pola semantycznego zapachów w polszczyźnie [Study of lexical field of smell in Polish]. Język polski, 52 (5), 330–339.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pybus, D., & Sell, C. (Eds.). (2007). The chemistry of fragrances. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. J. (1983 [1969]). Semantyczne ujęcia metafory [A semantic approach to metaphor, reprinted from: Fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ]. Pamiętnik Literacki, 74 (2), 307–320.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2010). Everybody goes down: Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 25 (3), 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Justice is blind: A model for analyzing metaphor transformations and narratives in actual discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 11, 70–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017a). Story simulation in metaphor comprehension. Metaphor. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 220–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Metaphorical stories in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Ableson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1–85). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snævarr, S. (2010). Metaphors, narratives, emotions: Their interplay and impact. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J. et al. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stickles, E., David, O., Dodge, E. K., & Hong, J. (2016). Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory. Constructions and frames, 8 (2), 166–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K. (2006). Frame-based constraints on lexical choice in metaphor. Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, 387–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Integrating constructional semantics and conceptual metaphor. In M. R. L. Petruck (Ed.), MetaNet (pp. 11–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2019). Mixed metaphors: Their use and abuse. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tirrell, L. (1989). Extending: The structure of metaphor. Noûs, 23 (1), 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, P. (1994). Extended metaphor –A text-world account. Language and Literature, 3 (2), 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, R. M. (1996). The structure of metaphor. The way the language of metaphor works. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Winter, B. (2019). Synaesthetic metaphors are neither synaesthetic nor metaphorical. In L. J. Speed, C. O”Meara, L. San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 105–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zawisławska, M. (2015). Reference, anaphora, coreference. In M. Ogrodniczuk, et al. (Eds.), Coreference in Polish: Annotation, resolution and evaluation (pp. 3–22). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Li, Limin
2022. Review of Giovanelli, Harrison & Nuttall (2021): New Directions in Cognitive Grammar and Style. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 9:2 ► pp. 445 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.