Cover not available
Article published In:
Visual Metaphors
Edited by Réka Benczes and Veronika Szelid
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1] 2020
► pp. 168–200
Applications of visual and linguistic metaphor

Image metaphors of Trianon

| Eötvös Loránd University
This paper studies the visual representation of the Treaty of Trianon by identifying the most common image metaphors related to it.
Three hypotheses are articulated. (1) Visual metaphors about Trianon are based on the same underlying conceptual metaphors as the corresponding metaphorical linguistic expressions. However, it is proposed that figures tend to be construed of mixed metaphors in order to convey a more condensed and complex message. In case of mixed metaphors, more source domains are applied to conceptualize the same target domain. (2) There exists a cultural cognition (Sharifian 2011) about Trianon, which is shared by the contemporary Hungarian community and which is represented in different modes of communication, namely in language and in images. The members of the community are able to understand and (re-)produce the linguistic and image metaphors about Trianon, because their conceptual system about Trianon is structured by similar conceptual metaphors. (3) Furthermore, based on linguistic data Putz (2019), it is assumed that the figures represent the perspective of the post-1920 Hungarian nation exclusively.
The data is based on a Google search conducted on January 15, 2019, which referenced figures of Trianon with a .hu internet domain. Among the hundreds of thousands of search results, the first 150 figures were selected and ordered into six categories. Among this set of figures, the analysis focused on illustrations based on maps of pre- and post-1920 Hungary. The paper provides an in-depth analysis of eight figures, based on a three-step procedure, which is motivated by Steen et al.’s (2017) protocol.
Keywords: image metaphor, conceptual metaphor, conceptual system about Trianon, cultural cognition of Trianon, Treaty of Trianon
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The Treaty of Trianon
    • 1.2Research questions and hypotheses
    • 1.3Conceptual, cultural, linguistic, and image metaphors
    • 1.4Corpus
    • 1.5Methodology
  • 2.Analysis of the figures
    • 2.1 Figure 1
      • 2.1.1Description
      • 2.1.2Interpretation
      • 2.1.3Conceptual processes
    • 2.2 Figure 2
      • 2.2.1Description
      • 2.2.2Interpretation
      • 2.2.3Conceptual processes
    • 2.3 Figure 3
      • 2.3.1Description
      • 2.3.2Interpretation
      • 2.3.3Conceptual processes
    • 2.4 Figure 4
      • 2.4.1Description
      • 2.4.2Interpretation
      • 2.4.3Conceptual processes
    • 2.5 Figure 5
      • 2.5.1Description
      • 2.5.2Interpretation
      • 2.5.3Conceptual processes
    • 2.6 Figure 6
      • 2.6.1Description
      • 2.6.2Interpretation
      • 2.6.3Conceptual processes
    • 3.7 Figure 7
      • 3.7.1Description
      • 3.7.2Interpretation
      • 3.7.3Conceptual processes
    • 2.8 Figure 8
      • 2.8.1Description
      • 2.8.2Interpretation
      • 2.8.3Conceptual processes
  • 3.Discussion
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00053.put
References (30)
References
Barcelona, A. & Valenzuela, J. (2011). An overview of cognitive linguistics. In M. Brdar & S. T. Gries & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. (2012). The human conceptual system. In M. Spivey – K. McRae – M. Joanisse (Eds.): The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistic (pp. 239–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bódy, Zs. (2018). (ed.) Háborúból békébe. A magyar társadalom 1918 után. [War and peace. The Hungarian society after 1918] Budapest: MTA BTK.Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El-Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: the example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feischmidt, M. (2014). Nemzet a mindennapokban. Az újnacionalizmius populáris kultúrája. [Nation in everyday life. The popular culture of new nationalism] Budapest: L’harmattan.Google Scholar
(forthcoming). Memory-politics and path dependency: Trianon as mytho-moteur of Hungarian neo-nationalism.
Forceville, C. J. (2018). A Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor. Lecture 2. When is something a pictorial metaphor? [Lecture notes] Retrieved from [URL] Accessed on January 15, 2019.
(2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. J. Foreceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gyáni, G. (2012a). Nemzet, kollektív emlékezet és public history. [Nation, collective meamory, and public history] Történelmi Szemle. 31, 357–375.Google Scholar
(2012b). The memory of Trianon as a political instrument in Hungary today. In Miller, A. & Lipman, M. (Eds.), The convolutions of historical politics (pp. 91–115). Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010a). Metaphor: A practical introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010b). Metaphor, language, and culture. D.E.L.T.A. 261, 739–57.Google Scholar
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(7) 37–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunt, G., L. Balogh, B. & Schmidt, A. (2018). (eds.) Trianon arcai. [Faces of Trianon] Budapest: Libri Kiadó.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In O. Andrew (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. 2nd edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mussolf, A. (2004). Metaphor and conceptual evolution. metaphoric.de. Retrieved from [URL] Accessed on January 15, 2019
Negro, I. (2015). The role of text in the identification of visual metaphor in advertising. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2121, 309–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford Online Dictionary (2018). Retrieved from [URL] Accessed on January 15, 2019
Putz, O. (2016). Metaphor evolution and survival in Hungarian public discourse on the Trianon peace treaty. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(2), 276–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Metaphor and national identity. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romsics, G. (2006). Trianon a Házban. A Trianon fogalom megjelenése es funkciói a pártok diskurzusaiban az első három parlamenti ciklus idején (1990–2002). [Trianon in the House. The representation and functions of the concept of Trianon int he discourse of the parties during the first three parlamentary terms] In Czoch, G. & Fedinec, Cs. (Eds.) Az emlékezet konstrukció. [The construction of memory] (pp. 35–52). Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány.Google Scholar
Romsics, I. (2001). A trianoni békeszerződés [The Treaty of Trianon]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2008). Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualisation, and language. In R. M. Frank & R. Dirven & T. Ziemke & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language, and mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 109–37). Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2011). Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. & Negro, I. & Šorm, E. (2017). General figure understanding in visual metaphor identification. Odisea, 181, 113–131.Google Scholar
Zeidler, M. (2002). A magyar irredenta kultusz a két világháború között. [The Hungarian irredentist cult between the two World Wars] Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány.Google Scholar
(2008). (Ed.) Trianon. 2nd edition. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar