Article published In:
Visual Metaphors
Edited by Réka Benczes and Veronika Szelid
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1] 2020
► pp. 168200
Barcelona, A. & Valenzuela, J.
(2011) An overview of cognitive linguistics. In M. Brdar & S. T. Gries & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.
(2012) The human conceptual system. In M. Spivey – K. McRae – M. Joanisse (Eds.): The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistic (pp. 239–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bódy, Zs
(2018) (ed.) Háborúból békébe. A magyar társadalom 1918 után. [War and peace. The Hungarian society after 1918] Budapest: MTA BTK.Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El-Refaie, E.
(2003) Understanding visual metaphor: the example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feischmidt, M.
(2014) Nemzet a mindennapokban. Az újnacionalizmius populáris kultúrája. [Nation in everyday life. The popular culture of new nationalism] Budapest: L’harmattan.Google Scholar
forthcoming). Memory-politics and path dependency: Trianon as mytho-moteur of Hungarian neo-nationalism.
Forceville, C. J.
(2018) A Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor. Lecture 2. When is something a pictorial metaphor? [Lecture notes] Retrieved from [URL] Accessed on January 15, 2019.
(2009) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. J. Foreceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gyáni, G.
(2012a) Nemzet, kollektív emlékezet és public history. [Nation, collective meamory, and public history] Történelmi Szemle. 31, 357–375.Google Scholar
(2012b) The memory of Trianon as a political instrument in Hungary today. In Miller, A. & Lipman, M. (Eds.), The convolutions of historical politics (pp. 91–115). Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2010a) Metaphor: A practical introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010b) Metaphor, language, and culture. D.E.L.T.A. 261, 739–57.Google Scholar
(2015) Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. & Radden, G.
(1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(7) 37–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunt, G., L. Balogh, B. & Schmidt, A.
(2018) (eds.) Trianon arcai. [Faces of Trianon] Budapest: Libri Kiadó.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In O. Andrew (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(2003) Metaphors we live by. 2nd edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mussolf, A.
(2004) Metaphor and conceptual evolution. Retrieved from [URL] Accessed on January 15, 2019
Negro, I.
(2015) The role of text in the identification of visual metaphor in advertising. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2121, 309–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford Online Dictionary
(2018) Retrieved from [URL] Accessed on January 15, 2019
Putz, O.
(2016) Metaphor evolution and survival in Hungarian public discourse on the Trianon peace treaty. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(2), 276–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Metaphor and national identity. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romsics, G.
(2006) Trianon a Házban. A Trianon fogalom megjelenése es funkciói a pártok diskurzusaiban az első három parlamenti ciklus idején (1990–2002). [Trianon in the House. The representation and functions of the concept of Trianon int he discourse of the parties during the first three parlamentary terms] In Czoch, G. & Fedinec, Cs. (Eds.) Az emlékezet konstrukció. [The construction of memory] (pp. 35–52). Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány.Google Scholar
Romsics, I.
(2001) A trianoni békeszerződés [The Treaty of Trianon]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F.
(2008) Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualisation, and language. In R. M. Frank & R. Dirven & T. Ziemke & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language, and mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 109–37). Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2011) Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. & Negro, I. & Šorm, E.
(2017) General figure understanding in visual metaphor identification. Odisea, 181, 113–131.Google Scholar
Zeidler, M.
(2002) A magyar irredenta kultusz a két világháború között. [The Hungarian irredentist cult between the two World Wars] Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány.Google Scholar
(2008) (Ed.) Trianon. 2nd edition. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar