Cover not available
Review published In:
Perception, Culture and Language
Edited by Judit Baranyiné Kóczy and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2] 2023
► pp. 488–497
Book review

Klaus-Uwe Panther. Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2022. ISBN 978-9-027-21062-3 (Hardbound) xxiii + 283 pp. € 90. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/clip​.4

Reviewed by
ORCID logo | Southwest University
Published online: 17 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00099.tan
References (24)
References
Bambini, V., Van Looy, L., Demiddele, K., & Schaeken, W. (2021). What is the contribution of executive functions to communicative-pragmatic skills? Insights from aging and different types of pragmatic inference. Cognitive Processing, 22 (3), 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bara, B. G. (2010). Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication (J. Douthwaite, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2003). On the plausibility of claiming a métonymie motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barceloca (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains. In Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. S. P. Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutica, I., Bucciarelli, M., & Bara, B. G. (2006). Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 98 (1), 12–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabbatore, I., Sacco, K., Angeleri, R., Zettin, M., Bara, B. G., & Bosco, F. M. (2015). Cognitive pragmatic treatment: A rehabilitative program for traumatic brain injury individuals. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 30 (5), E14–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. (2006). Ethopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M., Kádár, D. Z., & Terkourafi, M. (2021). Introduction: directions in sociopragmatics. In M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár & M. Terkourafi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociopragmatics (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L., Haberland, H., & Fisher, K. (2010). Editorial. Pragmatics and Society, 1 (1), 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U. & Radden, G. (2011). Introduction: Reflections on motivation revisited. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (1998). A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30 (6), 755–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. L. (2017). Metaphor and metonymy in language and thought: A cognitive linguistic approach. Synthesis Philosophica, 32 (2), 271–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (pp. 121–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (2012). Cognitive pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornburg, L. L., & Panther, K.-U. (1997). Speech act metonymies. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. R. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 205–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, X. (2019). 基于“社会认知”的社会认知语言学 [Sociocognitive linguistics based on social cognition]. Modern Foreign Languages, 42 (3), 293–305.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Zhu, X.-F., & He, G. (2018). 文化语用研究的三种范式及其相互关系 [Three paradigms in culturally-oriented pragmatics and their interrelationship]. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 20 (5), 539–544.Google Scholar