Bambini, V., Van Looy, L., Demiddele, K., & Schaeken, W.
(2021) What
is the contribution of executive functions to communicative-pragmatic skills? Insights from aging and different types of
pragmatic inference. Cognitive
Processing,
22
(3), 435–452.
Bara, B. G.
(2010) Cognitive
pragmatics: The mental processes of communication (J. Douthwaite, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Barcelona, A.
(2003) On
the plausibility of claiming a métonymie motivation for conceptual
metaphor. In A. Barceloca (Ed.), Metaphor
and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive
perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barcelona, A.
(2005) The
multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic
chains. In Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. S. P. Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive
linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary
interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cutica, I., Bucciarelli, M., & Bara, B. G.
(2006) Neuropragmatics:
Extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged
patients. Brain and
Language,
98
(1), 12–25.
Gabbatore, I., Sacco, K., Angeleri, R., Zettin, M., Bara, B. G., & Bosco, F. M.
(2015) Cognitive
pragmatic treatment: A rehabilitative program for traumatic brain injury individuals. Journal
of Head Trauma
Rehabilitation,
30
(5), E14–28.
Geeraerts, D.
(2010) Theories
of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goddard, C.
(2006) Ethopragmatics:
Understanding discourse in cultural
context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haugh, M., Kádár, D. Z., & Terkourafi, M.
(2021) Introduction: directions in sociopragmatics. In M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár & M. Terkourafi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociopragmatics (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kecskes, I.
(2014) Intercultural
pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations
of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1: Theoretical
Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W.
(2013) Essentials
of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mey, J. L., Haberland, H., & Fisher, K.
(2010) Editorial. Pragmatics
and
Society,
1
(1), 1–8.
(1998) A
cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics,
30
(6), 755–769.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
(2007) Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. L.
(2017) Metaphor
and metonymy in language and thought: A cognitive linguistic approach. Synthesis
Philosophica,
32
(2), 271–294.
Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. L.
(2018) What
kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual
metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive
issues (pp. 121–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schmid, H.-J.
(2012) Cognitive
pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Thornburg, L. L., & Panther, K.-U.
(1997) Speech
act metonymies. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. R. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse
and perspective in cognitive
linguistics (pp. 205–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wen, X.
(2019) 基于“社会认知”的社会认知语言学 [Sociocognitive linguistics based on
social cognition]. Modern Foreign
Languages,
42
(3), 293–305.
Wierzbicka, A.
(2003) Cross-cultural
pragmatics: The semantics of human
interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zappavigna, M.
(2012) Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury.
Zhu, X.-F., & He, G.
(2018) 文化语用研究的三种范式及其相互关系 [Three paradigms in culturally-oriented
pragmatics and their interrelationship]. Journal of Northeastern University (Social
Science),
20
(5), 539–544.