Review published In:
Perception, Culture and Language
Edited by Judit Baranyiné Kóczy and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2] 2023
► pp. 488497
References
Bambini, V., Van Looy, L., Demiddele, K., & Schaeken, W.
(2021) What is the contribution of executive functions to communicative-pragmatic skills? Insights from aging and different types of pragmatic inference. Cognitive Processing, 22 (3), 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bara, B. G.
(2010) Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication (J. Douthwaite, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(2003) On the plausibility of claiming a métonymie motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barceloca (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains. In Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. S. P. Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutica, I., Bucciarelli, M., & Bara, B. G.
(2006) Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 98 (1), 12–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabbatore, I., Sacco, K., Angeleri, R., Zettin, M., Bara, B. G., & Bosco, F. M.
(2015) Cognitive pragmatic treatment: A rehabilitative program for traumatic brain injury individuals. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 30 (5), E14–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(2010) Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, C.
(2006) Ethopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M., Kádár, D. Z., & Terkourafi, M.
(2021) Introduction: directions in sociopragmatics. In M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár & M. Terkourafi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociopragmatics (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, I.
(2014) Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L., Haberland, H., & Fisher, K.
(2010) Editorial. Pragmatics and Society, 1 (1), 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U. & Radden, G.
(2011) Introduction: Reflections on motivation revisited. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L.
(1998) A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30 (6), 755–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. L.
(2017) Metaphor and metonymy in language and thought: A cognitive linguistic approach. Synthesis Philosophica, 32 (2), 271–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (pp. 121–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J.
(2012) Cognitive pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornburg, L. L., & Panther, K.-U.
(1997) Speech act metonymies. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. R. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 205–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, X.
(2019) 基于“社会认知”的社会认知语言学 [Sociocognitive linguistics based on social cognition]. Modern Foreign Languages, 42 (3), 293–305.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(2003) Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M.
(2012) Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Zhu, X.-F., & He, G.
(2018) 文化语用研究的三种范式及其相互关系 [Three paradigms in culturally-oriented pragmatics and their interrelationship]. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 20 (5), 539–544.Google Scholar