Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Approaches to Mind, Language, and Society: Theory and description
Edited by Mario Serrano-Losada and Daniela Pettersson-Traba
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1] 2024
► pp. 34–50

From conceptual to literary metaphors

A neuroaesthetics perspective

ORCID logo | Universidad de Alcalá
It is generally agreed that literary metaphors are produced and interpreted by using the same strategies as more conventional, ordinary metaphorical expressions (George Lakoff & Mark Turner 1989; Zoltán Kövecses 2010). However, the aesthetic experience of reading metaphors in literature is a complex phenomenon that remains only partially explained. This paper aims at contributing to the study of the cognitive mechanisms that allow the aesthetic experience when reading poetic metaphors. For this purpose, after a short review of previous research on literary metaphors in the Cognitive Linguistic framework, the main tenets of Neuroaesthetics (Semir Zeki 2001; Vilayanur Ramachandran 2003), an emerging empirical discipline, are presented as referred to the study of visual art. Then, the insights from both fields are compared and applied to the study of metaphors. Results show significant coincidences as empirical research in neuroscience seem to confirm the theories and hypotheses posed by cognitive linguists, as for the way in which the emotional response to poetic metaphors is elicited.
Keywords: literary metaphors, conceptual metaphors, Neuroaesthetics, emotion, poetics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literary metaphors in cognitive linguistics
  • 3.Neuroaesthetics: An emergent discipline for the study of visual art
  • 4.Neuroaesthetics and literary metaphors
  • 5.Final remarks
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 6 June 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00111.por
References (53)
References
Burke, M. (2013). The rhetorical neuroscience of style: On the primacy of style elements during literary discourse processing. Journal of Literary Semantics, 42 (2), 199–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cavanagh, P. (2005). The artist as neuroscientist. Nature, 434 1, 301–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2011). Neuroaesthetics: A coming of age story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 23 (1), 53–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The aesthetic brain: How we evolved to desire beauty and enjoy art. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2014). Neuroaesthetics: Descriptive and experimental approaches. In P. P. L. Tinio & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 481–499). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18 (7), 370–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, A., Thomas, A., Smith, S. E., & Aguirre, G. K. (2009). The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology, 23 (2), 135–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coccagna, M., Avanzini, P., Portera, M., Vecchiato, G., Destro, M. F., Sironi, A. V., Salvi, F., Banzi, A., Elisabetta, C., Lanzoni, L., Antonella, V., Bisi, M., Cesari, S., Vivarelli, A., Pier, G. B., Camillo, G. S., Sassu, G., & Mazzacane, S. (2020). Neuroaesthetics of art vision: An experimental approach to the sense of beauty. Journal of Clinical Trials, 10 (2), Article 1000404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman, M. H. (1998). Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a cognitive theory of literature. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 253–282). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2007). Cognitive linguistic approaches to literary studies: State of the art in cognitive poetics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1175–1202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gavins, J., & G. Steen. (2003). Cognitive poetics in practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Getz, I., & Lubart, T. (2000). An emotional-experiential perspective on creative symbolic-metaphorical processes. Consciousness & Emotion, 1 (2), 283–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (1990). The process of understanding literary metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics, 19 (2), 65–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2015a). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9 1, Article 186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In R. M. Willems (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use (pp. 135–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21 (4), 663–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Creating metaphor in context. International Journal of Language and Culture, 1 (1), 21–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Metaphor universals in literature. ANTARES: Letras e Humanidades, 10 (20), 154–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leder, H. (2013). Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study?. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7 (1), 27–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. (2009). Neuroaesthetics of literary reading. In M. Skov, O. Vartanian, C. Martindale & A. Berleant (Eds.), Neuroaesthetics (pp. 233–247). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2018). Towards an empirical model of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature, 8 (1), 21–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2017). Metaphor and cultural cognition. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 325–344). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Porto, M. D. (2018). Un viaje a las metáforas literarias: de la lingüística cognitiva a la neuroestética [A journey to literary metaphors: From Cognitive Linguistics to Neuroaesthetics]. Lingüística en Red (LinRed), XV Monográfico, 2–18.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. (2003). The emerging mind. London: Profile Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6 (6–7), 15–51.Google Scholar
Salgaro, M. (2009). The text as a manual. Some reflections on the concept of language from a neuroaesthetic perspective. Journal of Literary Theory, 3 (1), 155–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seeley, W. P. (2013). Art, meaning, and perception: A question of methods for a cognitive neuroscience of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 53 (4), 443–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E., & Steen, G. (2008). Metaphor in literature. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 232–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (2005/1595). Romeo and Juliet (T. J. B. Spencer Ed.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Skov, M., & Nadal, M. (2022). The Routledge international handbook of neuroaesthetics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steen, G. (1994). Understanding metaphor in Literature: An empirical approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1999). Analyzing metaphor in literature: With examples from William Wordsworth’s “I wandered lonely as a cloud.”. Poetics Today, 20 (3), 499–522. [URL]
(2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved!. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1), 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90 1, 67–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G., & Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (2004). Questions about metaphor in literature. European Journal of English Studies, 8 (3), 337–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2009). Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
(2016). Texture. In V. Sotirova (Ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to stylistics (pp. 458–473). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tabakowska, E. (1993). Cognitive linguistics and poetics of translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2015). Relating language to other cognitive systems: An overview. Cognitive Semantics, 1 (1), 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
(2002). Aspects of cognitive poetics. In E. Semino & J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 279–318). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeki, S. (1998). Art and the brain. Daedalus, 127 (2), 71–103. [URL]
(1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Artistic creativity and the brain. Science, 293 (5527), 51–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeki, S., Bao, Y., & Pöppel, E. (2020). Neuroaesthetics: The art, science, and brain triptych. Psych Journal, 9 (4), 427–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar